09.03.2014 Views

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Professor Tilton’s price analysis has been criticized by representatives of Japanese integrated producers on<br />

the following grounds: (1) The big buyer price difference is partially explained by the overall long-term<br />

appreciation of the yen since the Plaza Accord in 1985; (2) big buyer prices include only Japan’s largest,<br />

most sophisticated steel consumers, whereas the U.S. contract price includes many smaller, less dem<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

customers; <strong>and</strong> (3) big buyers in Japan prefer their traditional integrated suppliers due to a high level of<br />

customer service <strong>and</strong> product customization. 42 Representatives of Japanese firms have also noted concern<br />

with the reliability of the reported big buyer prices themselves. 43<br />

While these factors may influence high domestic prices to major customers, they cannot alone explain the<br />

sheer size of the price differences involved—particularly given Japan’s weak domestic market. First, the<br />

yen has fluctuated substantially since 1985. Yet big buyer prices have remained high <strong>and</strong> stable in<br />

comparison with other prices in Japan, Japanese export prices, <strong>and</strong> prices in other major markets such as<br />

the United States. Second, the contention that the big buyer price is limited to a select group of the most<br />

sophisticated customers is at odds with the fact that sales to big buyers reflect a substantial majority of<br />

integrated producers’ total sales, which is not disputed by representatives of Japanese integrated<br />

producers. 44 It is also at odds with the information indicating, as noted above, that the reported big buyer<br />

prices are for commercial-grade ordinary steel. Finally, while factors such as customer service <strong>and</strong><br />

production customization may influence price (as Tilton’s analysis recognizes), 45 even those analyses, such<br />

as antidumping analyses, that take company-, product-, <strong>and</strong> market-specific differences into account find<br />

substantial pricing differences.<br />

Barriers to Imports<br />

Although Japanese domestic prices have long been at levels well above prices prevailing in other markets,<br />

imports into Japan have remained low by international st<strong>and</strong>ards. Of course, high domestic prices could not<br />

hold if importers were able to take advantage of these high prices. Several factors—including distribution<br />

barriers, product-certification requirements, <strong>and</strong> alleged international market-sharing arrangements—can<br />

be identified that limit Japan’s steel imports, <strong>and</strong> as such can help explain the existence of a noncompetitive<br />

domestic market.<br />

Japanese steel import penetration has historically remained at less than 10 percent, below import levels in<br />

the United States, Korea, <strong>and</strong> the EU. 46 While imports were increasing gradually up to 1991, they fell<br />

sharply through the rest of the 1990s as domestic dem<strong>and</strong> dropped. The fall in imports was in fact even<br />

steeper than the fall in overall domestic dem<strong>and</strong>: while domestic apparent consumption declined nearly 30<br />

percent over the past decade, imports plummeted by 50 percent, from nearly 14 million MT in 1991 to 6.6<br />

million MT in 1998. As a result, even as measured against a declining Japanese steel market due to the<br />

prolonged recession, imports became increasingly less significant relative to domestic shipments. Imports<br />

comprised 9.6 percent of domestic apparent consumption in 1991, <strong>and</strong> just 7.4 percent in 1998. 47<br />

The decline in imports since 1991 cuts across most major product groups:<br />

• Imports of hot-rolled steel fell from 3.5 million MT in the early 1990s to 2.2 million MT by 1998.<br />

• Imports of long products, including structural shapes <strong>and</strong> wire rod, fell drastically, from over a million<br />

MT in 1991 to less than 200,000 MT in 1998. 48<br />

For certain products, both imports <strong>and</strong> domestic apparent consumption fell so severely as to render trends<br />

in product-specific import penetration rates almost meaningless. For instance, despite a meager overall<br />

import penetration rate of just over 7 percent for all steel products, import penetration of hot-rolled steel<br />

had by some measures increased to nearly 40 percent by 1998, despite the substantial drop in hot-rolled<br />

steel imports noted above. This is because the already-small Japanese merchant market for hot-rolled steel<br />

had plummeted to just 6 million MT in 1998, down from 10.5 million MT in 1991. 49<br />

Chapter 3: Behind the Crisis—Japan 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!