09.03.2014 Views

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Regulating POSCO after privatization to prevent unreasonable diversification.<br />

• Removing restrictions on new entry into the blast furnace sector.<br />

• Limiting POSCO’s control over the distribution structure <strong>and</strong> correcting the company’s exclusionary<br />

distribution practices, particularly Posteel’s operation of an “exclusionary distribution network that<br />

restricts its own sales outlets from h<strong>and</strong>ling competing companies’ products.” 57<br />

The KFTC recommendations were not implemented due to opposition by government agencies, including<br />

the Ministry of Commerce, Industry, <strong>and</strong> Energy. The Planning <strong>and</strong> Budget Commission interpreted the<br />

recommendations as a “suggestion.” 58 In response to U.S. government questions about the KFTC report as<br />

part of ongoing bilateral discussions, the Korean government clarified:<br />

The Board of Audit <strong>and</strong> Inspection recommended in June 1998 that POSCO divest its equities in [its<br />

sales] agents, for POSCO’s investment to them is inefficient in the Board’s judgement, considering<br />

its small return. POSCO has agreed to do it step by step. …The Korean Government decided<br />

against splitting up POSCO into two separate companies because it would not be economically<br />

viable to do so. The government further considered concerns over monopolization to be addressed<br />

with the elimination of POSCO’s interest in the domestic distributors, low tariff rates which are<br />

scheduled to be reduced to zero <strong>and</strong> the proximity <strong>and</strong> capacity of the Japanese steel industry which<br />

is a significant participant in the Korean steel market. The KFTC report was not binding on<br />

POSCO. Moreover, other independent studies such as that conducted by the Korea Development<br />

Institute recommended against splitting up POSCO because it would reduce the efficiencies of the<br />

company <strong>and</strong> steel making in Korea. 59<br />

Over the past several years, the Korean government has actively protected POSCO’s dominant position in<br />

the Korean marketplace. For instance, in the mid-1990s, the government discouraged Hyundai from<br />

building an integrated steel plant in order to protect POSCO’s dominant position. 60 Hyundai had planned to<br />

construct an integrated blast furnace plant, mostly for the company’s own steel requirements. According to<br />

industry sources, Hyundai wanted to rely less on POSCO, in part because of Hyundai’s need for<br />

specialized products. 61 In 1996, the KFTC cited this example as evidence of the existence of “tacit<br />

restrictions to entry” into the blast furnace sector. 62<br />

How POSCO Weathered the Crisis<br />

During 1998, POSCO’s dominant position appears to have helped it weather the effects of the Asian<br />

financial crisis much better than Korean mini-mills. This is strikingly evident when contrasting the position<br />

of POSCO with that of the mini-mills in both the domestic <strong>and</strong> export markets in 1998.<br />

Domestic Sales. Prior to <strong>and</strong> during the Asian financial crisis, POSCO’s sales mix (domestic vs. export<br />

sales) remained fairly stable, with no major shift between domestic <strong>and</strong> export sales. However, from 1997<br />

to 1998, POSCO’s share of domestic sales of finished steel by all Korean producers surged from 54<br />

percent to 70 percent. While POSCO’s domestic sales declined 7 percent (1.2 million MT), other Korean<br />

producers’ domestic sales tumbled 53 percent (from 16 million MT in 1997 to 7.6 million MT in 1998). As<br />

a result, these producers’ share of total domestic sales by Korean producers fell from 46 percent in 1997 to<br />

30 percent in 1998 63 (Chart 3-33).<br />

Export Sales. Korea’s finished <strong>and</strong> semifinished steel exports are the mirror-image of the domestic<br />

situation among Korean producers. POSCO’s exports of finished <strong>and</strong> semifinished steel increased nearly 14<br />

percent in 1998 (slightly more than 1.2 million MT). 64 While this may seem like a significant increase, the<br />

exports of other Korean producers of finished <strong>and</strong> semifinished steel increased by more than 200 percent<br />

(more than 4.6 million MT). 65 Exports of these producers (excluding POSCO) increased from 20 percent of<br />

total exports in 1997 to 40 percent of total exports in 1998.<br />

Chapter 3: Behind the Crisis—Korea 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!