Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions
Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions
Global Steel Trade; Structural Problems and Future Solutions
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Regulating POSCO after privatization to prevent unreasonable diversification.<br />
• Removing restrictions on new entry into the blast furnace sector.<br />
• Limiting POSCO’s control over the distribution structure <strong>and</strong> correcting the company’s exclusionary<br />
distribution practices, particularly Posteel’s operation of an “exclusionary distribution network that<br />
restricts its own sales outlets from h<strong>and</strong>ling competing companies’ products.” 57<br />
The KFTC recommendations were not implemented due to opposition by government agencies, including<br />
the Ministry of Commerce, Industry, <strong>and</strong> Energy. The Planning <strong>and</strong> Budget Commission interpreted the<br />
recommendations as a “suggestion.” 58 In response to U.S. government questions about the KFTC report as<br />
part of ongoing bilateral discussions, the Korean government clarified:<br />
The Board of Audit <strong>and</strong> Inspection recommended in June 1998 that POSCO divest its equities in [its<br />
sales] agents, for POSCO’s investment to them is inefficient in the Board’s judgement, considering<br />
its small return. POSCO has agreed to do it step by step. …The Korean Government decided<br />
against splitting up POSCO into two separate companies because it would not be economically<br />
viable to do so. The government further considered concerns over monopolization to be addressed<br />
with the elimination of POSCO’s interest in the domestic distributors, low tariff rates which are<br />
scheduled to be reduced to zero <strong>and</strong> the proximity <strong>and</strong> capacity of the Japanese steel industry which<br />
is a significant participant in the Korean steel market. The KFTC report was not binding on<br />
POSCO. Moreover, other independent studies such as that conducted by the Korea Development<br />
Institute recommended against splitting up POSCO because it would reduce the efficiencies of the<br />
company <strong>and</strong> steel making in Korea. 59<br />
Over the past several years, the Korean government has actively protected POSCO’s dominant position in<br />
the Korean marketplace. For instance, in the mid-1990s, the government discouraged Hyundai from<br />
building an integrated steel plant in order to protect POSCO’s dominant position. 60 Hyundai had planned to<br />
construct an integrated blast furnace plant, mostly for the company’s own steel requirements. According to<br />
industry sources, Hyundai wanted to rely less on POSCO, in part because of Hyundai’s need for<br />
specialized products. 61 In 1996, the KFTC cited this example as evidence of the existence of “tacit<br />
restrictions to entry” into the blast furnace sector. 62<br />
How POSCO Weathered the Crisis<br />
During 1998, POSCO’s dominant position appears to have helped it weather the effects of the Asian<br />
financial crisis much better than Korean mini-mills. This is strikingly evident when contrasting the position<br />
of POSCO with that of the mini-mills in both the domestic <strong>and</strong> export markets in 1998.<br />
Domestic Sales. Prior to <strong>and</strong> during the Asian financial crisis, POSCO’s sales mix (domestic vs. export<br />
sales) remained fairly stable, with no major shift between domestic <strong>and</strong> export sales. However, from 1997<br />
to 1998, POSCO’s share of domestic sales of finished steel by all Korean producers surged from 54<br />
percent to 70 percent. While POSCO’s domestic sales declined 7 percent (1.2 million MT), other Korean<br />
producers’ domestic sales tumbled 53 percent (from 16 million MT in 1997 to 7.6 million MT in 1998). As<br />
a result, these producers’ share of total domestic sales by Korean producers fell from 46 percent in 1997 to<br />
30 percent in 1998 63 (Chart 3-33).<br />
Export Sales. Korea’s finished <strong>and</strong> semifinished steel exports are the mirror-image of the domestic<br />
situation among Korean producers. POSCO’s exports of finished <strong>and</strong> semifinished steel increased nearly 14<br />
percent in 1998 (slightly more than 1.2 million MT). 64 While this may seem like a significant increase, the<br />
exports of other Korean producers of finished <strong>and</strong> semifinished steel increased by more than 200 percent<br />
(more than 4.6 million MT). 65 Exports of these producers (excluding POSCO) increased from 20 percent of<br />
total exports in 1997 to 40 percent of total exports in 1998.<br />
Chapter 3: Behind the Crisis—Korea 93