11.04.2014 Views

Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics - IEA

Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics - IEA

Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics - IEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

TEACHER PAY AND STUDENT MATHEMATICS ACHIEVEMENT<br />

<strong>Teacher</strong> education<br />

Primary school teachers <strong>in</strong> Mexico traditionally tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> normal schools, but s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

the mid 1980s, all primary <strong>and</strong> secondary teachers have been required to obta<strong>in</strong><br />

university-level degrees, from either university or post-secondary normal schools.<br />

Although secondary school teachers generally have university degrees, a 2004 Mexican<br />

employment survey (National Institute of Statistics, Geography, <strong>and</strong> Information,<br />

2004) found that a significant proportion of secondary teachers had not completed a<br />

university qualification.<br />

In 2004, Mexico had 457 teachers’ colleges nationwide, with an enrollment of 169,671<br />

students. Public <strong>in</strong>stitutions enrolled 60% of the students attend<strong>in</strong>g teachers’ colleges <strong>in</strong><br />

2004; the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 40% of students attended private teachers’ colleges. In 2004, 28%<br />

of students attend<strong>in</strong>g teachers’ colleges were enrolled <strong>in</strong> programs offer<strong>in</strong>g a primary<br />

teach<strong>in</strong>g degree, compared with 39% <strong>in</strong> secondary teach<strong>in</strong>g programs <strong>and</strong> 19% <strong>in</strong><br />

preschool programs (Guevara & González, 2004).<br />

In 1993, Mexico’s M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>Education</strong> established the Carerra Magisterial (CM), a new<br />

promotion (<strong>and</strong> pay) system for teachers. The system allows teachers who voluntarily<br />

enter the CM to raise their salaries by a po<strong>in</strong>t system based on exam<strong>in</strong>ations, <strong>in</strong>-service<br />

tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> the performance of their students. By atta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g CM po<strong>in</strong>ts, teachers can<br />

double their salary while ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the same level of experience <strong>and</strong> pre-service<br />

education. This voluntary horizontal promotion arrangement is supposed to reward<br />

teachers who attempt to improve their skills as teachers <strong>and</strong> thereby improve student<br />

performance. Evidence suggests that teachers’ scores on the academic knowledge section<br />

of the CM teacher test correlate significantly <strong>and</strong> positively with student performance,<br />

especially at the secondary school level (Luschei, 2005; Santibañez, 2002). Nevertheless,<br />

the CM is primarily a mechanism for substantially rais<strong>in</strong>g teacher pay by legitimiz<strong>in</strong>g<br />

that <strong>in</strong>crease as part of a teacher-improvement <strong>in</strong>centive program.<br />

Another development <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s (1992/1993) saw the central government<br />

devolv<strong>in</strong>g control of the federal portion of educational spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> school<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istration to the states. Today, the federal government provides block grants for<br />

education to the states, <strong>and</strong> the states then allocate resources as they see fit to the schools.<br />

Hir<strong>in</strong>g of teachers also became the prov<strong>in</strong>ce of the states, although the teacher union<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ues to be organized at national level, <strong>and</strong> general salary policies cont<strong>in</strong>ue to be<br />

negotiated nationally. The federal government (via the M<strong>in</strong>istry of <strong>Education</strong>) is still<br />

responsible for national plans, develop<strong>in</strong>g curricula <strong>and</strong> textbooks, develop<strong>in</strong>g materials<br />

for teacher education, <strong>and</strong> evaluat<strong>in</strong>g the national system (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividual state<br />

systems). 15 The federal government also supplies textbooks free to primary students.<br />

15 The federal government established an autonomous evaluation <strong>in</strong>stitution, the Institute for the Evaluation of<br />

<strong>Education</strong>, <strong>in</strong> 2001. However, some states have set up (or are sett<strong>in</strong>g up) local centers that have taken on the task<br />

of develop<strong>in</strong>g programs designed to evaluate school performance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!