12.05.2014 Views

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

individuals can also be ordinary people. A woman who remembers when the factories<br />

first began putting out work can be an invaluable resource. Key in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mants are often<br />

identified in a sequential process, beginning with the obvious official types and<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tinuing by asking each interviewee who might provide additi<strong>on</strong>al in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Formal in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant interviewing requires c<strong>on</strong>siderable preparati<strong>on</strong>. It takes reading and<br />

thought to decide what questi<strong>on</strong>s to ask. The trick is to get the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> you need<br />

without wasting in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mants’ time by asking <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> things that you might just as easily obtain<br />

elsewhere. Work out carefully what you want to ask, and in approximately what order.<br />

The in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant may shift from <strong>on</strong>e topic to another so that the list is not covered in the<br />

order planned, but topics can be ticked off as they are discussed so that all are covered.<br />

Try to put in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mants at ease and encourage full discussi<strong>on</strong> of each topic. Encourage<br />

precisi<strong>on</strong> and specific examples where answers are vague or rhetorical. As a general<br />

principle, let the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant carry the discussi<strong>on</strong>. Say as little as possible yourself; you<br />

have come to listen. Your opini<strong>on</strong>s, if injected too so<strong>on</strong>, could bias the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant’s<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>ses. An interview should not last too l<strong>on</strong>g. A carefully planned interview can<br />

usually be carried out in 30-60 minutes; <strong>on</strong>ly in excepti<strong>on</strong>al circumstances would a single<br />

interview go bey<strong>on</strong>d two hours.<br />

Listen critically. The material supplied by in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mants is not always fully reliable. Piel<br />

(1995) suggests a series of questi<strong>on</strong>s to ask yourself:<br />

1. How does the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant know this - from pers<strong>on</strong>al experience, a report, or merely<br />

opini<strong>on</strong>?<br />

2. To what extent is the report affected by the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant’s positi<strong>on</strong> in the community,<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>ality, etc.?<br />

3. Does this account serve his/her pers<strong>on</strong>al prejudices or commitments? Is this what<br />

should have happened rather than what did happen?<br />

4. What evidence do I have that this pers<strong>on</strong> is usually accurate? Is the report internally<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sistent? Does it agree with what others have said?<br />

Sometimes you can test the <str<strong>on</strong>g>value</str<strong>on</strong>g> of what the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant is saying during the course of the<br />

interview by asking probing questi<strong>on</strong>s. When you feel that to do this would be<br />

inappropriate or would break the relati<strong>on</strong>ship you are trying to establish with the<br />

in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mant, you might just note your questi<strong>on</strong>s and hesitati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> future reference.<br />

108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!