12.05.2014 Views

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Answering this questi<strong>on</strong> may be critical to assess the prospects of particular export<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>chain</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. For example, the US government grants ‘Most Favoured Nati<strong>on</strong> Status’ to<br />

China but not to neighbouring countries like Vietnam. The official source would<br />

not provide this in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> in such a straight<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>ward way. It is more likely to<br />

read like this. “The United States has granted permanent MFN status (now known<br />

as Normal Trade Relati<strong>on</strong>s NTR) to most countries internati<strong>on</strong>ally. However, a<br />

short number of countries do not have NTR status, they include: Afghanistan,<br />

Cuba, Laos, M<strong>on</strong>tenegro, North Korea, Serbia, and Vietnam. Also, select nati<strong>on</strong>’s<br />

NTR status is reviewed annually. These include: Armenia, Belarus, Bulgaria,<br />

China, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan,<br />

Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.” You may wish to check with the United<br />

States Trade Representative’s office to find further in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the NTR status<br />

of the countries you are most c<strong>on</strong>cerned with; see http://www.ustr.gov/. Up to<br />

date in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> such matters should also be available from the embassy of the<br />

importing country c<strong>on</strong>cerned, or you may find that the Manufacturers Associati<strong>on</strong><br />

provides such in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> routinely to its members.<br />

• How does multi-lateral trade policy of importing countries affect the growth prospects<br />

of local producers?<br />

The Multi-Fibre-Agreement (MFA) is particularly relevant here. The MFA<br />

protected developed countries against imports from developing countries. This<br />

system of protecti<strong>on</strong> is being gradually dismantled over the period 1995 to 2005.<br />

The impact of developing country exporters will vary: Asian exporters are likely<br />

to gain and African exporters are likely to loose (see ‘Trade Protecti<strong>on</strong> in the<br />

Textile and Clothing Industries’, Trade and Investment Background Briefing No.4,<br />

IDS-Sussex 1999).<br />

Another, more recent example is the US Government’s Africa Growth and<br />

Opportunity Act (AGOA), which extends duty-free import status to African<br />

countries that meet certain requirements. The Act is still fairly new, so it is<br />

difficult to assess its impact. If it works as anticipated, it should make African<br />

garments more competitive <strong>on</strong> the US market. For more in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> AGOA,<br />

see www.agoa.gov.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!