McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA
McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA
McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Answering this questi<strong>on</strong> may be critical to assess the prospects of particular export<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>chain</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. For example, the US government grants ‘Most Favoured Nati<strong>on</strong> Status’ to<br />
China but not to neighbouring countries like Vietnam. The official source would<br />
not provide this in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> in such a straight<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>ward way. It is more likely to<br />
read like this. “The United States has granted permanent MFN status (now known<br />
as Normal Trade Relati<strong>on</strong>s NTR) to most countries internati<strong>on</strong>ally. However, a<br />
short number of countries do not have NTR status, they include: Afghanistan,<br />
Cuba, Laos, M<strong>on</strong>tenegro, North Korea, Serbia, and Vietnam. Also, select nati<strong>on</strong>’s<br />
NTR status is reviewed annually. These include: Armenia, Belarus, Bulgaria,<br />
China, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan,<br />
Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan.” You may wish to check with the United<br />
States Trade Representative’s office to find further in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the NTR status<br />
of the countries you are most c<strong>on</strong>cerned with; see http://www.ustr.gov/. Up to<br />
date in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> such matters should also be available from the embassy of the<br />
importing country c<strong>on</strong>cerned, or you may find that the Manufacturers Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
provides such in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> routinely to its members.<br />
• How does multi-lateral trade policy of importing countries affect the growth prospects<br />
of local producers?<br />
The Multi-Fibre-Agreement (MFA) is particularly relevant here. The MFA<br />
protected developed countries against imports from developing countries. This<br />
system of protecti<strong>on</strong> is being gradually dismantled over the period 1995 to 2005.<br />
The impact of developing country exporters will vary: Asian exporters are likely<br />
to gain and African exporters are likely to loose (see ‘Trade Protecti<strong>on</strong> in the<br />
Textile and Clothing Industries’, Trade and Investment Background Briefing No.4,<br />
IDS-Sussex 1999).<br />
Another, more recent example is the US Government’s Africa Growth and<br />
Opportunity Act (AGOA), which extends duty-free import status to African<br />
countries that meet certain requirements. The Act is still fairly new, so it is<br />
difficult to assess its impact. If it works as anticipated, it should make African<br />
garments more competitive <strong>on</strong> the US market. For more in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> AGOA,<br />
see www.agoa.gov.<br />
89