McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA
McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA
McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
In step <strong>on</strong>e, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>er gathered the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> given in Table 16.2. The data are<br />
broken down by sex, and include the compositi<strong>on</strong> of the work<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce, its age breakdown,<br />
remunerati<strong>on</strong>, educati<strong>on</strong>, training, experience, promoti<strong>on</strong> patterns, and hours worked. The<br />
gender data show that top and middle management are mostly male; support staff are half<br />
male, half female; supervisory staff are mostly male; while producti<strong>on</strong> workers, both in<br />
the factory and the outworkers are overwhelmingly female. The data also show<br />
differences in mean age, remunerati<strong>on</strong>, educati<strong>on</strong> levels, training, previous experience,<br />
patterns of promoti<strong>on</strong>, and average hours worked per week.<br />
Once the basic in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> has been gathered, the gender analysis moves to step 2 (see<br />
Table 16.1). In this step, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>er attempts to put the in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> about the <str<strong>on</strong>g>chain</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
into a broader c<strong>on</strong>text. The nature of the c<strong>on</strong>text will depend in large part <strong>on</strong> what the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>er is trying to achieve. If, <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> example, it appears that female workers are more<br />
disadvantaged in the garment industry than in other industries in the same country, the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>er may want to make ‘industry as a whole’ or ‘manufacturing industry’ the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>text. In this case s/he will probably use sources such as government statistical data to<br />
gather the same kinds of demographic and labour <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the comparis<strong>on</strong><br />
group. Alternatively, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>er may believe that the bigger problem is that female<br />
garment workers are worse off in this country than they are in other countries competing<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the same markets. In this case, s/he may choose ‘the garment industry in competing<br />
countries’ as the comparis<strong>on</strong> group.<br />
When the reference group has been decided, the <str<strong>on</strong>g>research</str<strong>on</strong>g>er sets about gathering the same<br />
in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> that group as was collected <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the <str<strong>on</strong>g>chain</str<strong>on</strong>g>. As indicated in Table 16.2, this<br />
would include gender disaggregated data <strong>on</strong> work<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>ce compositi<strong>on</strong>, age, remunerati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
etc.<br />
With the comparative in<str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>mati<strong>on</strong> in place, the analysis moves to step 3, the instituti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
assessment. The literature <strong>on</strong> instituti<strong>on</strong>s and their organisati<strong>on</strong>al <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g>ms suggests that they<br />
vary c<strong>on</strong>siderably from each other and across cultures. Despite their differences, they can<br />
analysed in terms of their comm<strong>on</strong> comp<strong>on</strong>ents. We identify five elements <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> this<br />
analysis: rules, activities, resources, people, and power (see Table 16.1):<br />
94