12.05.2014 Views

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

McCormick+Schmitz Handbook for value chain research on - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[The following example is hypothetical. We would welcome real data here. DM/HS]<br />

Box 13.1: An exercise in observati<strong>on</strong>: Distributing work to homeworkers<br />

What is going <strong>on</strong>?<br />

I am riding in the fr<strong>on</strong>t seat of an old van driven by Mr. M, the intermediary who delivers outwork to<br />

Maria and a dozen or so other homeworkers in the same area. This intermediary deals with firms in<br />

Chain 2 (US market). Today we are delivering large packages of pre-cut pieces of boys’ shirts to each<br />

of the homeworkers, and collecting the work finished in the past week.<br />

What is the setting/envir<strong>on</strong>ment like?<br />

We turn off the main road and go about two kilometres into the interior <strong>on</strong> a rough dirt road towards<br />

Maria’s home. The road is dry now, but Mr. M. tells me that the last kilometre is sometimes impassable<br />

in the rainy seas<strong>on</strong>. Maria knows that at such times she must double-wrap the finished goods in plastic<br />

and send them with her teenaged s<strong>on</strong>s to a certain point where they will wait <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> Mr. M.<br />

When we reach Maria’s house, we knock at the door. I note that Maria’s four-year-old daughter is<br />

playing outside. When we go inside, I see the two-year-old sleeping <strong>on</strong> the sofa in the sitting room. The<br />

sewing machine (an old electric Singer) is in the sitting room, next to a large table that appears to<br />

double as the family dining table. Finished work is packed into large plastic sacks. Some pre-cut pieces<br />

- probably those remaining from the last batch - are in piles <strong>on</strong> the table. The sacks of finished work are<br />

under the table. Although it is mid afterno<strong>on</strong>, the overhead lights are <strong>on</strong> because a large tree outside<br />

shades the <strong>on</strong>ly window.<br />

Who is participating?<br />

There are two participants:<br />

Maria:<br />

age - late thirties; gender - female; positi<strong>on</strong> - homeworker; status - low;<br />

Mr. M: age - 40ish; gender - male; positi<strong>on</strong> - intermediary; status - ?<br />

How often does this happen? How l<strong>on</strong>g does it take? Is it typical?<br />

Mr. M. visits Maria every 7 to 10 days. Today, he will set the date of the next visit. Mr. M. first checks<br />

and counts the finished pieces (16 minutes) He records the tally (297 accepted, 3 rejected) in his ledger<br />

book under Maria’s name. Then he repacks the goods, with accepted items going into the large sacks<br />

and rejects into a separate bag (4 minutes). He pays Maria <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> the accepted items and she signs the<br />

book next to her name (3 minutes). After dealing with the finished goods, he gives Maria the new work.<br />

Again, he records the work under Maria’s name. He tells her when he will come back, and we leave (5<br />

minutes). Today’s visit took a total of 28 minutes. According to Mr. M., this is typical. Visits take<br />

between 20 and 35 minutes, except in the rainy seas<strong>on</strong>, when the counting and checking must take place<br />

in the cramped quarters of the van, and the new work must be carefully repacked to ensure that it does<br />

not get wet or muddy.<br />

How does it compare with what I have seen elsewhere?<br />

Last week I travelled with a different intermediary to visit homeworkers of Chain 3. I note two main<br />

differences between Maria’s situati<strong>on</strong> and theirs. Maria’s sewing machine is old and very basic<br />

compared to those I saw last week. I also note that the number of rejects (3 out of 300) is lower than the<br />

average I computed <str<strong>on</strong>g>for</str<strong>on</strong>g> Chain 3 (2.6 out of 100).<br />

79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!