27.05.2014 Views

GEO Haiti 2010

GEO Haiti 2010

GEO Haiti 2010

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>GEO</strong> HAITI • <strong>2010</strong><br />

132<br />

A research team was created on the issue of<br />

“waste” at the Water Quality and Environment<br />

Laboratory (LAQUE) of Quisqueya University (UniQ).<br />

As key stakeholders in this project and leaders<br />

of various investigations, the team has rapidly<br />

acquired the necessary experience, particularly<br />

in the field of composting, to intervene in other<br />

current projects, as the one of OXFAM, within the<br />

Eau-Cap project, in Jacmel and Saint-Marc.<br />

The UNDP has also established a composting<br />

project at Carrefour-Feuilles where interns have<br />

been trained. The Quisqueya University was<br />

responsible of its scientific follow-up, which would<br />

allow the intervention to be renewed in order to<br />

make it sustainable.<br />

8.3.2 The Issue of Potable Water<br />

Two systems have been put in place regarding the<br />

supply of potable water in the country:<br />

• CAMEP – Metropolitan Autonomous Potable<br />

Water Plant, created in 1989 under the authority<br />

of the Ministry of Public Works, is responsible for<br />

supplying the areas of Port-au-Prince, Piéton-<br />

Ville, Delmas and Carrefour. Its management<br />

system still is inadequate and characterized<br />

by institutional instability, a lack of investment<br />

capacity, low output and insufficient revenue<br />

collection. In Port-au-Prince, CAMEP’s network<br />

serves all official neighbourhoods, but not the<br />

squatter settlements.<br />

• SNEP, National Potable-Water Service, created<br />

in 1977, was originally intended to supply the<br />

smaller towns of all regions throughout the<br />

country. However, since 1989, it only serves the<br />

regions not covered by CAMEP.<br />

According to GRET, in 2000, of Port-au-Prince’s<br />

2.5 million inhabitants, only 27,500, or 1.4% of<br />

the population were officially connected to<br />

CAMEP’s potable-water supply network, although<br />

the water-table on the periphery of the city was<br />

capable of supplying the entire population.<br />

Water, as healthcare and education, has long<br />

been considered a basic service. The price of<br />

water billed to the public is generally substantially<br />

lower than its true cost and revenue collection is<br />

not systematic. Additionally, only the middle and<br />

upper classes, mainly in the urban areas, are usually<br />

supplied with potable water. The chronic deficit in<br />

State revenues hinders the expansion of the water<br />

supply network and ensures only a minimum level<br />

of maintenance and quality control.<br />

Vast segments of the population are forced to<br />

obtain fresh water by other means. Some take<br />

the risk of drinking from contaminated rivers or<br />

decrepit wells and their health often suffers the<br />

consequences. Others connect illegally to the<br />

public water network. But sooner or later, most<br />

end up buying water from private suppliers, legal<br />

or illegal, who make attractive profits by carting<br />

or trucking water to the poor neighbourhoods.<br />

Several studies show that the prices charged by<br />

these suppliers can be up to 30 times higher than<br />

those paid by households connected to the public<br />

network (Constance, 1999).<br />

8.3.3 Sewage Disposal<br />

Compared to industrialised nations, in developing<br />

countries the load of wastewater pollution<br />

contained in the effluents of the urban sanitation<br />

systems is discharged practically unchanged into<br />

the ecosystems. The inherent danger of these<br />

effluents to the ecosystems is apparent in the two<br />

management methods explained below. However,<br />

it is generally more acute in developing countries<br />

because of insufficient or non-existent dilution.<br />

a) Disposal of Excreta in Urban Areas<br />

Most people in the metropolitan areas do not<br />

have a septic tank and are not connected to<br />

the sewage system. Excreta directly pollute the<br />

natural environment (mangrove forests, riverbeds,<br />

underground through cesspools) which of course<br />

has repercussions on the quality of water (Les<br />

Amis de la Terre, 2005).<br />

The following graph shows the evolution in<br />

excreta disposal conditions across the country<br />

from 1980 to 1997.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!