07.08.2014 Views

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Australia<br />

<strong>The</strong> AER’s regulatory approach involves determining a revenue cap for each<br />

transmission business, which is the maximum revenue a business can earn during the<br />

regulatory period. <strong>The</strong> AER applies a building block model to determine the revenue<br />

that a transmission business needs to cover its efficient costs <strong>and</strong> a commercial return to<br />

the business. <strong>The</strong> building blocks cover:<br />

a operational <strong>and</strong> maintenance expenditure;<br />

b capital expenditure;<br />

c asset depreciation costs;<br />

d taxation liabilities; <strong>and</strong><br />

e a commercial return on capital.<br />

<strong>The</strong> AER will also determine whether a service target performance incentive scheme<br />

(service st<strong>and</strong>ards scheme) or efficiency benefit-sharing scheme will apply to that<br />

business:<br />

a an ‘efficiency benefit-sharing scheme’ encourages transmission businesses to<br />

achieve efficient operating <strong>and</strong> maintenance expenditure in running their<br />

networks by sharing efficiency gains between businesses <strong>and</strong> customers (through<br />

lower prices); <strong>and</strong><br />

b a ‘service target performance incentive scheme’ encourages businesses to maintain<br />

or improve network service performance <strong>and</strong> thus balances the efficiency benefitsharing<br />

scheme so businesses do not reduce costs at the expense of service quality.<br />

<strong>The</strong> regulatory framework for distribution businesses is similar to the framework for<br />

transmission businesses but there are differences. In particular, where the AER is the<br />

regulator (state <strong>and</strong> territory regulators in Western Australia <strong>and</strong> the Northern Territory<br />

still regulate distribution businesses in those jurisdictions), the process commences when<br />

the AER releases a draft framework approach for a network.<br />

Unlike transmission businesses, which must all be subject to a revenue cap,<br />

distribution businesses must be subject to some form of control mechanism, but the<br />

AER may choose the form of incentive. In addition to revenue <strong>and</strong> price caps, the<br />

following approaches are available in Australia <strong>and</strong> have been used by regulators in some<br />

of the jurisdictions or networks:<br />

a revenue yield models, which link the revenue a business may earn to the volume<br />

of electricity sold;<br />

b weighted average price caps, which set a ceiling on distribution prices but allow<br />

flexibility in individual tariffs within that ceiling; <strong>and</strong><br />

c schedule of fixed price caps, whereby a list or schedule of prices is set for each<br />

individual service that the business provides.<br />

When using any of the above control mechanisms, the AER is also required to forecast<br />

the revenue requirement of the business over the regulatory period. This is achieved using<br />

a building block model, with building blocks covering:<br />

a investment forecasts;<br />

b the operating expenditure allowances that a benchmark distribution business<br />

would require if operating efficiently;<br />

c asset depreciation costs;<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!