07.08.2014 Views

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 24<br />

Turkey<br />

Zeynel Tunç 1<br />

I<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

Turkey’s general energy policy is to maintain a high-quality, reliable, continuous <strong>and</strong> costeffective<br />

supply while maintaining a liberal, competitive, transparent, non-discriminatory<br />

<strong>and</strong> stable market. Additionally, Turkey intends to reduce its dependence on imported<br />

energy. To achieve these ends, the Turkish government has been reforming its energy laws<br />

while trying to promote private investment in its energy market. Recent trends, in particular<br />

in the electricity <strong>and</strong> renewable energy sectors, show an even stronger push towards<br />

privatisation that corresponds with the growth of Turkey’s economy <strong>and</strong> population. As<br />

such, this chapter will focus exclusively on Turkey’s electricity law, the developments taking<br />

place in the privatisation of its electricity market <strong>and</strong> on renewable energy.<br />

Following the reform programme <strong>and</strong> the opening up of the Turkish economy<br />

in the 1980s, the statutory monopoly of the Turkish Electricity Company (‘TEK’) was<br />

abolished by the Electricity Act in 1984, <strong>and</strong> it became possible for private companies to<br />

engage in electricity generation activities under the transfer of operating rights (‘TOOR’)<br />

<strong>and</strong> build–operate–transfer (‘BOT’) contracting models. <strong>The</strong> main objective of the<br />

Electricity Act was simply to provide authorisation to private companies rather than<br />

giving concessions. <strong>The</strong> Council of State (‘the Daniştay’), however, decided in 1996 that<br />

transferring electricity generation activities through the TOOR <strong>and</strong> BOT contracting<br />

models was just another way of giving concessions; this decision led to a change in<br />

the concession law to govern the implementation of these contracting models. In time,<br />

four different contract models were used to attract private investors, including the<br />

BOT, build–own–operate (‘BOO’), autoproducer <strong>and</strong> TOOR models. <strong>The</strong> BOT <strong>and</strong><br />

BOO approaches had attracted substantial new power plant investments because these<br />

approaches had purchase <strong>and</strong> payment guarantees, which were backed by guarantees<br />

issued by the Turkish Treasury.<br />

1 Zeynel Tunç is a senior associate at Paksoy Attorneys at Law.<br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!