07.08.2014 Views

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

United States<br />

with their st<strong>and</strong>ards through the purchase of tradable renewable energy credits (though<br />

there are no national or regional markets for these credits because of differences across<br />

states’ st<strong>and</strong>ards). More than 40 states <strong>and</strong> the District of Columbia have established<br />

net metering policies that allow retail electricity consumers who own or host distributed<br />

renewable generation resources (predominantly solar electric systems) to supply excess<br />

generation to their retail electricity supplier in exchange for credits against their retail<br />

electricity bills over 12-month <strong>and</strong> sometimes longer periods. Typically, generation<br />

resources eligible for net metering arrangements cannot be sized at levels greatly in excess<br />

of a retail consumer’s peak dem<strong>and</strong>. A number of states offer various tax incentive <strong>and</strong><br />

rebate programs for distributed renewable generation resources. Most notably, California<br />

provides a property tax exclusion for certain solar resources as well as installation cost<br />

rebates or performance-based payments for solar <strong>and</strong> certain other renewable resources<br />

(e.g., wind, fuel cells <strong>and</strong> CHP).<br />

As discussed above, many of the federal tax incentive <strong>and</strong> financing support<br />

programmes have ended or will soon end, though some of these programs could be<br />

extended by Congress, as has been the case in past years, <strong>and</strong> has been proposed in<br />

various legislation. However, given current fiscal concerns <strong>and</strong> related political<br />

disagreements over the nature <strong>and</strong> role of federal financial support for clean energy,<br />

the prospects for such legislation during 2012 remain unclear. At the same time, statebased<br />

renewable portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ards, as well as net metering, tax incentive <strong>and</strong> rebate<br />

programmes for distributed renewable generation resources appear poised to remain in<br />

place for the foreseeable future (<strong>and</strong> as discussed in Section VI, infra, California not only<br />

strengthened its renewable portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ard during 2011, it also took major steps to<br />

begin implementing its own GHG cap <strong>and</strong> trade program, which is intended, in part,<br />

to support greater deployment of renewable generation resources). Moreover, a number<br />

of states are actively considering establishing, <strong>and</strong> in 2011 one state established, publicprivate<br />

partnership clean energy financing entities to support deployment of renewable<br />

energy <strong>and</strong> energy efficiency projects.<br />

ii <strong>Energy</strong> efficiency <strong>and</strong> conservation<br />

<strong>The</strong> United States has a limited set of comprehensive policies regarding promotion<br />

of energy efficiency for electric appliances <strong>and</strong> energy efficiency st<strong>and</strong>ards for federal<br />

buildings <strong>and</strong> properties. In addition, the federal government has various targeted grants<br />

<strong>and</strong> financing support programs as well as tax incentives for energy efficiency investments.<br />

A large number of states have similar types of programmes (many of which are<br />

supported in whole or in part by funds provided by the federal government) <strong>and</strong> a large<br />

number of states have energy efficiency portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ards, similar in concept to a<br />

renewable energy portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ard, that require retail electric utilities to reduce their<br />

total retail sales, peak retail sales, or both, by certain amounts by target dates. Some states<br />

combine their renewable <strong>and</strong> energy efficiency portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ards. A number of states<br />

have also combined their energy efficiency portfolio st<strong>and</strong>ards with retail utility rate<br />

‘decoupling’ policies to allow utilities to recover of <strong>and</strong> on their fixed costs regardless of<br />

reduced retail sales resulting from energy saving efforts. Certain states have implemented<br />

or will soon implement financing support programs for end-use energy efficiency<br />

investments, including ‘on-bill’ financing or repayment programmes that allow retail<br />

341

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!