07.08.2014 Views

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

The Energy Regulation and Markets Review - Stikeman Elliott

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

South Africa<br />

the funding mechanism for such energy feedstock or carrier; <strong>and</strong> the obligations to be<br />

imposed, on producers of energy feedstocks, to supply to the nominated state-owned<br />

entity the requisite energy feedstock, in a manner prescribed by regulation.<br />

IV<br />

ENERGY MARKETS<br />

i Development of energy markets<br />

Currently no organised markets for electricity or gas trading exist in South Africa. As<br />

previously mentioned, under the ISMO Bill the ISMO will act as the sole market operator<br />

in a single buyer market where it will aggregate all commercial generation purchases<br />

<strong>and</strong> wholesale electricity sales to distributors. Electricity purchases by the ISMO will<br />

be, at least over the short to medium term, subject to long-term take-or-pay power<br />

purchase agreements with fixed tariffs, including existing power purchase agreements<br />

concluded by Eskom as buyer which will be assigned to the ISMO by regulation. Under<br />

the ISMO Bill, therefore, the ISMO will purchase electricity <strong>and</strong> then resell electricity to<br />

distributors <strong>and</strong> large customers. <strong>The</strong> regulations <strong>and</strong> rules that will govern the ISMO’s<br />

conduct as market operator have yet to be developed <strong>and</strong> it is therefore unclear at this<br />

time when (or even if) South Africa will develop electricity markets to facilitate direct<br />

sales among generators, traders <strong>and</strong> end-use customers.<br />

ii Contracts for sale of energy<br />

Electricity<br />

Historically bilateral electricity purchases have not been precluded by law. Given the low<br />

cost of electricity <strong>and</strong> high level of security of supply maintained by Eskom, 53 however,<br />

South Africa did not offer any real opportunities for competing generators to engage in<br />

the supply of electricity on a sustainable commercial basis.<br />

By January 2008, South Africa’s reserve margin plummeted to 5 per cent.<br />

Although by 2011, its reserve margin had increased to 14.9 per cent, it is generally<br />

considered that the reserve margin will be under severe negative pressure over the next<br />

five years given extended delays in the construction programmes for new Eskom baseload<br />

generators, extended maintenance outages arising from the deferral of routine<br />

maintenance on existing generators <strong>and</strong> increased dem<strong>and</strong>. From April 2008 to March<br />

2011 average wholesale electricity tariffs more than doubled (to 52 South African cents<br />

per kWh) at an average annual escalation of about 23 per cent. According to information<br />

presented in parliament, Eskom has assumed annual increases of 25 per cent for the<br />

period April 2012 to March 2015 <strong>and</strong> increases of 6 per cent thereafter. Consequently,<br />

many energy-intensive users, particularly in the minerals sector, have announced plans for<br />

the procurement of IPP capacity under bilateral electricity sale <strong>and</strong> purchase agreements.<br />

Recent proposed amendments to the electricity regulatory framework have<br />

brought a measure of uncertainty as to the potential for the development of bilateral<br />

energy markets operating outside the regulated single buyer market. As previously<br />

53 Over the 1970s to 2007 South Africa enjoyed high reserve margins, generally in excess of 15<br />

per cent.<br />

252

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!