Appendix H - Historical Archaeological and ... - CBP.gov

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Tribal statutes and treaties Most important was the Treaty of Greenville (1795), which ceded the southern two-thirds of Ohio to the United States. The treaty, which followed the Indian defeat at Fallen Timbers, was signed by representatives (chiefs and headmen) of the Wyandot, Delaware, Shawnee, Ottawa, Chippewa, Potawatomi, Miami, Wea, Kickapoo, and Kaskaskia. General "Mad Anthony" Wayne represented the United States. No federally recognized Native American tribes or reservations exist in Ohio. Federal lands and agencies Three Federal agencies possess land in the project area in Ohio: the DOD, including the Army Corps of Engineers lakes (Charles Mill Lake, Mosquito Creek Lake, Pleasant Hill Lake, Beach City Lake, Berlin Lake, Mohawk Reservoir, Atwood Lake, Leesville Lake, and Ravenna Arsenal); the USFWS (the Ottawa and Cedar Point National Wildlife Refuges); and the NPS (Cuyahoga Valley National Park) (www.nationalatlas.gov). 5.7.2.4 Michigan State Historic Cultural Resource Laws, Statutes, and Regulations In Michigan, state regulations/standards related to cultural resources have their legislative basis in Federal law, specifically Section 106 of the NHPA. Such laws are restricted to protecting cultural resources that may be threatened by Federal, state-funded, or state-permitted projects. The governor appoints the Michigan SHPO. State Historic Preservation Office The Michigan SHPO is part of the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) of the Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth. Prior to 2009, the SHPO was part of the Department of History, Arts, and Libraries. The SHPO’s functions include (www.michigan.gov/mshda/0,1607,7-141-54317-53069--,00.html): Providing assistance to local communities to identify and protect historic resources in the state; and, Administering Federal and state tax incentive and grant programs. Michigan’s MSHDA website is www.michigan.gov/mshda/0,1607,7-141-54317-53069-- ,00.html. Inventory and evaluation (National Register) procedures: Procedures for identification, inventory and evaluation of National Register-eligible properties in Michigan follow those outlined in the ACHP guidelines for the protection of cultural and historic properties (36 CFR Part 800). In Michigan, the Michigan State Historic Preservation Review Board is responsible for reviewing and approving nominations to the National Register. Northern Border Activities H-194 July 2012
State preservation plan Michigan’s current (2007–2012) state historic preservation plan, Preservation Shore to Shore: Making Michigan Competitive Through Historic Preservation, is available for download at www.michigan.gov/mshda/0,1607,7-141-54317_54760_27123---,00.html. Resources for identifying locations of cultural resources (GIS, web, database, etc.) A map-based interactive partial inventory of above-ground historical resources is available through the Michigan Historical Center’s historic sites online database at www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/map.asp. A visit to the SHPO or the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA) is typically necessary for identifying archaeological sites and recently inventoried above-ground properties. Guidance to Federal agencies for 106 and other compliance: Guidance related to the Section 106 review process in the state is online at www.michigan.gov/mshda/0,1607,7-141-54317_54371-98336--,00.html and at http://mishporehab.wordpress.com/archaeology/. Special forms for SHPO 106 notification or identified cultural resources: As of June, 2011, the Michigan SHPO was revising its system of inventory forms for recording cultural resources. Updated forms are available by contacting the SHPO online at www.michigan.gov/mshda/0,1607,7-141-54317-97306--,00.html. Requirements for research reports: Requirements/standards for cultural resources investigations in Michigan are described in the SHPO’s Manual for Historic and Architectural Surveys in Michigan, published in 2001. The manual is available for download at www.michigan.gov/mshda/0,1607,7-141-54317_20901-- -,00.html. Qualifications for cultural resources specialists: Principal investigators for cultural resources investigations in Michigan are required to meet the minimal qualifications described in 36 CFR Part 61. Permit or other requirements for archaeological investigations: The SHPO does not require a permit for archaeological investigations. Tribal statutes and treaties There are six Native American Reservations and other lands in the study area in Michigan, all of which were established by treaty and agreements with the U.S. government in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The Onontagon and L’Anse Reservations of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community and the Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians was established by the Treaty of La Pointe, Wisconsin of 1854; the Bay Mills Indian Community of the Ojibwe and the Hannahville Community of the Potawatomi were organized with the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934; and the Isabella Reservation was established by a pair of treaties in Northern Border Activities H-195 July 2012
Page 1 and 2:
APPENDIX H HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGICAL
Page 3 and 4:
Relatively few early Paleo-Indian s
Page 5 and 6:
to 8,690±50 B.P. and 8,670±60 B.P
Page 7 and 8:
midden at the Knox site. The first
Page 9 and 10:
fauna diminished (as did the specie
Page 11 and 12:
Woodland Period The first use of ce
Page 13 and 14:
In general, early archaeological si
Page 15 and 16:
more during the Archaic period by c
Page 17 and 18:
ever occupied” (Thomas et al., 19
Page 19 and 20:
1.1.3 GREAT LAKES REGION 1.1.3.1 St
Page 21 and 22:
same contexts, such as at the Front
Page 23 and 24:
Ritchie and Funk, 1973:97). Graves
Page 25 and 26:
ectangular-shaped houses (Engelbrec
Page 27 and 28:
Early Archaic preference towards oc
Page 29 and 30:
York just north of the Pennsylvania
Page 31 and 32:
2000:99). Typical ceramic vessels f
Page 33 and 34:
Early Archaic projectile point form
Page 35 and 36:
typically located on high terrain n
Page 37 and 38:
worked projectile points; anvilston
Page 39 and 40:
epresented as the late prehistoric
Page 41 and 42:
encampments occurred in the moraina
Page 43 and 44:
northerly ceramics with ceramics mo
Page 45 and 46:
1999; Fitting, 1974; Franzen, 1987;
Page 47 and 48:
Beginning as early as the tenth cen
Page 49 and 50:
they comprised were copper implemen
Page 51 and 52:
“mobile bands using large territo
Page 53 and 54:
Figure H-2. Prehistoric/Precontact
Page 55 and 56:
Site types range across the full sp
Page 57 and 58:
Figure H-4. Plateau and Northern Ro
Page 59 and 60:
of processed resources such as char
Page 61 and 62:
large part to poor preservation of
Page 63 and 64:
climate, which was at a peak of war
Page 65 and 66:
the early to middle Holocene (ca. 8
Page 67 and 68:
archaeological record of residentia
Page 69 and 70:
In northern Maine, the Madawaska se
Page 71 and 72:
1.2.1.2 State of New Hampshire Con
Page 73 and 74:
Agriculture Mid-nineteenth- to earl
Page 75 and 76:
United States and Europe. Rustic ca
Page 77 and 78:
forts in the Champlain Valley, New
Page 79 and 80:
accommodate plows pulled by oxen, h
Page 81 and 82:
1.2.2 GREAT LAKES REGION 1.2.2.1 St
Page 83 and 84:
Transportation Overland roads were
Page 85 and 86:
several wind-energy projects and wi
Page 87 and 88:
in 1759 (Waddell and Bomberger, 199
Page 89 and 90:
During the Revolutionary War, Major
Page 91 and 92:
the years after the Civil War, grap
Page 93 and 94:
Disagreements over this area erupte
Page 95 and 96:
Figure H-8. Ohio Land Grants and Su
Page 97 and 98:
made of frame construction, and lat
Page 99 and 100:
transfiguring industry in general w
Page 101 and 102:
crossings. The bridge follows a sim
Page 103 and 104:
influx of German and Scandinavian i
Page 105 and 106:
The first routes through the wilder
Page 107 and 108:
Montana is rich in mineral resource
Page 109 and 110:
Figure H-9. Early Trails, Trading P
Page 111 and 112:
Figure H-10. Railroad System in Ida
Page 113 and 114:
Midwestern reserves of white pine b
Page 115 and 116:
to wildlife preserves, parks and pr
Page 117 and 118:
Social and Cultural Single men pred
Page 119 and 120:
the Puget Sound region and a few in
Page 121 and 122:
community airfields. By this time,
Page 123 and 124:
until the 1960s (Fahey, 1986:175-17
Page 125 and 126:
Among the first actions of Washingt
Page 127 and 128:
2 NATIVE AMERICAN SACRED SITES AND
Page 129 and 130:
includes the Vermont Historic Prese
Page 131 and 132:
2.1.4 WOR REGION 2.1.4.1 States of
Page 133 and 134:
Object. An object is defined as a s
Page 135 and 136:
Structures The most imposing histor
Page 137 and 138:
figures, and the women’s rights m
Page 139 and 140:
Table H-1. Representative Architect
Page 141 and 142:
Allegheny County Owned River Bridge
Page 143 and 144: Architectural Styles/Forms Building
Page 145 and 146: Numerous historic-era lodges, resor
Page 147 and 148: oads and rail lines connected the r
Page 149 and 150: 4 PALEONTOLOGIC RESOURCES This Pale
Page 151 and 152: to the geological study-area maps a
Page 153 and 154: 4.2.1.2 New Hampshire Summary Paleo
Page 155 and 156: achiopods, nautiloids, and even rar
Page 157 and 158: 4.2.2.4 Michigan Summary Paleontolo
Page 159 and 160: Cretaceous - A northeastern extensi
Page 161 and 162: warm, with wetter conditions near t
Page 163 and 164: 4.2.4.2 Washington Summary Paleonto
Page 165 and 166: Northern Border Activities H-165 Ju
Page 167 and 168: Figure H-16. Geologically Relevant
Page 173 and 174: The nature of consultation in Secti
Page 175 and 176: NHPA and 36 CFR 800, it established
Page 177 and 178: invertebrate and plant paleontologi
Page 179 and 180: For above-ground culture resources
Page 181 and 182: Cultural resource laws for New Hamp
Page 183 and 184: It does not appear that a permit is
Page 185 and 186: farming or forestry). Some other si
Page 187 and 188: Maintains the New York State Regist
Page 189 and 190: Historic resources are addressed in
Page 191 and 192: Permit or other requirements for ar
Page 193: State preservation plan: The OHPO S
Page 197 and 198: Provides technical assistance to lo
Page 199 and 200: Indians, and the Stockbridge-Munsee
Page 201 and 202: 5. To expand and enhance efforts to
Page 203 and 204: The Archaeology and Historic Preser
Page 205 and 206: Administering Federal tax incentive
Page 207 and 208: State Historic Preservation Office
Page 209 and 210: Oversees the identification and eva
Page 211 and 212: REFERENCES (Aaberg, et al., 2003).
Page 213 and 214: (Blaisdell, 1982). Blaisdell, Katha
Page 215 and 216: (Bunker, 1994). Bunker, V. 1994. Ne
Page 217 and 218: (Churchill, 1967). Churchill, M. G.
Page 219 and 220: (DeMallie, 2001a). DeMallie, R. J.
Page 221 and 222: (Fahey, 1965). Fahey, John. 1965. I
Page 223 and 224: (Funk and Hoagland, 1972). Funk, R.
Page 225 and 226: (Hackbarth, 2003). Hackbarth, Linda
Page 227 and 228: (Hickcox, 1983). Hickcox, David H.
Page 229 and 230: (Johnson, 1988). Johnson, Curtis B.
Page 231 and 232: (Langhorne, 1976). Langhorne, Willi
Page 233 and 234: (Maymon and Bolian, 1992). Maymon,
Page 235 and 236: (MN SHPO, 2006). Minnesota State Hi
Page 237 and 238: (Ozker, 1982). Ozker, D. B. 1982. A
Page 239 and 240: (Randall and Ryan, 1912). Randall,
Page 241 and 242: (Sanford, 1894). Sanford, L. G. 189
Page 243 and 244: (Stamps and Zurel, 1980). Stamps, R
Page 245 and 246:
(Stothers, et al., 2001). Stothers,
Page 247 and 248:
(USDA, 2007). U.S. Department of Ag
Page 249 and 250:
(Wright, 1972). Wright, J. V. 1972.
show all

Appendix H - Historical Archaeological and ... - CBP.gov

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?