09.09.2014 Views

13th International Conference on Membrane Computing - MTA Sztaki

13th International Conference on Membrane Computing - MTA Sztaki

13th International Conference on Membrane Computing - MTA Sztaki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

R. Freund<br />

Yet in c<strong>on</strong>trast to the results proved in the preceding secti<strong>on</strong> for the 1-<br />

restricted minimally transiti<strong>on</strong> mode, now with n<strong>on</strong>cooperative rules we <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

obtain semilinear sets when using the k-restricted maximally parallel transiti<strong>on</strong><br />

mode:<br />

Theorem 8. For every ρ ∈ {N, T } and every k ∈ N as well as any possible<br />

partiti<strong>on</strong>ing Θ of the rule sets in the P systems, i.e., for all p ∈ N, and for any<br />

halting c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> γ ∈ {H, F },<br />

NREG = NO ∗ C ∗ (max k (p), γ, ρ) [ncoo] .<br />

Again, with decaying objects, the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s of Lemma 1 are fulfilled, hence,<br />

we get the following results:<br />

Theorem 9. For all n, d ≥ 1, each Y ∈ {N, P s}, as well as for any halting<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> γ ∈ {H, h, A, F },<br />

Y REG = Y O [d]<br />

∗ C n (max k , γ, E) [coo] .<br />

Theorem 10. For all n, d ≥ 1, each Y ∈ {N, P s}, as well as for any halting<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> γ ∈ {H, h, F }, for any ρ ∈ {N, T } ∪ {−l | l ∈ N},<br />

Y F IN = Y O [d]<br />

∗ C n (max k , γ, ρ) [coo] .<br />

4 Computati<strong>on</strong>al Completeness Results for P Systems<br />

with Decaying Objects<br />

In this secti<strong>on</strong> we prove computati<strong>on</strong>al completeness for catalytic P systems as<br />

well as for P systems using cooperative rules with decaying objects. Moreover,<br />

we <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>sider P systems with <strong>on</strong>e membrane/cell.<br />

Catalytic P systems can be seen as a specific variant of P systems using<br />

cooperative rules, hence, we first establish the computati<strong>on</strong>al completeness result<br />

for P systems using cooperative rules; when using arbitrary cooperative rules,<br />

additi<strong>on</strong>al ingredients such as c<strong>on</strong>text c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s can be avoided, yet <strong>on</strong>ly when<br />

using the transiti<strong>on</strong> mode maxobj instead of max as well as with adult halting<br />

or halting with final state:<br />

Theorem 11. For all n ≥ 1 and all d ≥ 2 as well as any γ ∈ {A, F }, any<br />

ρ ∈ {N, T } ∪ {−l | l ∈ N}, and each Y ∈ {N, P s},<br />

Y RE = Y O [d]<br />

∗ C n (maxobj, γ, ρ) [coo] .<br />

Proof (sketch). We <strong>on</strong>ly show P sRE ⊆ P sO [2]<br />

∗ C 1 (maxobj, γ, ρ) [coo]. The instructi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

of a register machine M = (m, B, l 0 , l h , P ) can be simulated by a P<br />

system Π = (1, V, T, l 0 , R, 1) with decaying objects of decay d = 2 using cooperative<br />

rules in the transiti<strong>on</strong> mode maxobj. As usual, the c<strong>on</strong>tents of a register j<br />

is represented by the corresp<strong>on</strong>ding number of copies of the symbol a j ; T c<strong>on</strong>sists<br />

of the symbols a j , 3 ≤ j ≤ m. For keeping the objects a j , 1 ≤ j ≤ m, alive,<br />

we use the rules a j → a j .<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!