09.09.2014 Views

13th International Conference on Membrane Computing - MTA Sztaki

13th International Conference on Membrane Computing - MTA Sztaki

13th International Conference on Membrane Computing - MTA Sztaki

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Modelling ecological systems with the calculus of wrapped compartments<br />

Species showing a high growth rate are selected by the r factor, they usually<br />

exploit low-crowded envir<strong>on</strong>ments and produce many offspring, each of which has<br />

a relatively low probability of surviving to adulthood. By c<strong>on</strong>trast, K-selected<br />

species adapt to densities close to the carrying capacity, tend to str<strong>on</strong>gly compete<br />

in high-crowded envir<strong>on</strong>ments and produce fewer offspring, each of which has a<br />

relatively high probability of surviving to adulthood.<br />

Example 2. There is little, or no advantage at all, in evolving traits that permit<br />

successful competiti<strong>on</strong> with other organisms in an envir<strong>on</strong>ment that is very<br />

likely to change rapidly, often in disruptive ways. Unstable envir<strong>on</strong>ments thus<br />

favour species that reproduce quickly (r-selected species). Stable envir<strong>on</strong>ments,<br />

by c<strong>on</strong>trast, favour the ability to compete successfully for limited resources (Kselected<br />

species). We c<strong>on</strong>sider individuals of two species, a and b. Individuals of<br />

species a are modelled with an higher growth rate with respect to individuals of<br />

species b (r a > r b ). Carrying capacity for species a is, instead, lower than the<br />

carrying capacity for species b (K a < K b ). The following CWC rules describe<br />

the r/K selecti<strong>on</strong> model for r a = 5, r b = 0.00125, K a = 100 and K b = 1000:<br />

l : a ↦−→ 5<br />

a a l : b 0.00125<br />

↦−→ b b<br />

l : a a ↦−→ 0.1<br />

a l : b b 0.0000025<br />

↦−→ b<br />

We might c<strong>on</strong>sider a disruptive event occurring <strong>on</strong> average every 4000 years with<br />

the rule:<br />

⊤ : (x ⌋ X) l 0.00025<br />

↦−→ (x ⌋ a b) l<br />

devastating the whole c<strong>on</strong>tent of the compartment (modelled with the variable<br />

X) and just leaving <strong>on</strong>e individual of each species. In Figure 2 we show a 10000<br />

years simulati<strong>on</strong> for an initial system c<strong>on</strong>taining just <strong>on</strong>e individual for each<br />

species. Notice how individuals of species b are disadvantaged with respect to<br />

individuals of species a who reach the carrying capacity very so<strong>on</strong>. A curve<br />

showing the growth of individuals of species b in a stable (n<strong>on</strong> disruptive) envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

is also shown. The full CWC model describing this example can be<br />

found at: http://www.di.unito.it/~troina/cmc13/rK.cwc.<br />

3.2 Competiti<strong>on</strong> and Mutualism<br />

In ecology, competiti<strong>on</strong> is a c<strong>on</strong>test for resources between organisms: animals,<br />

e.g., compete for water supplies, food, mates, and other biological resources.<br />

In the l<strong>on</strong>g term period, competiti<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g individuals of the same species<br />

(intraspecific competiti<strong>on</strong>) and am<strong>on</strong>g individuals of different species (interspecific<br />

competiti<strong>on</strong>) operates as a driving force of adaptati<strong>on</strong>, and, eventually, by<br />

natural selecti<strong>on</strong>, of evoluti<strong>on</strong>. Competiti<strong>on</strong>, reducing the fitness of the individuals<br />

involved, 11 has a great potential in altering the structure of populati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

11 By fitness it is intended the ability of surviving and reproducing. A reducti<strong>on</strong> in<br />

the fitness of an individual implies a reducti<strong>on</strong> in the reproductive output. On the<br />

opposite side, a fitness benefit implies an improvement in the reproductive output.<br />

393

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!