- Page 1 and 2:
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emul
- Page 3 and 4:
2.10 SURFACE TREATMENTS, DISTRESS,
- Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Needs to be Compl
- Page 7 and 8:
DISCLAIMER This document is dissemi
- Page 9 and 10:
1. Compile published research on th
- Page 11 and 12:
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW OF POLYMER MO
- Page 13 and 14:
the emulsion solution is termed the
- Page 15 and 16:
molecular weights ranging up to 100
- Page 17 and 18:
Elastomeric polymers exhibit a low
- Page 19 and 20:
The first commercial process that w
- Page 21 and 22:
2.2.3 Synthetic Rubber and Latex Sy
- Page 23 and 24:
Latex Modified Unmodified 80 Chip R
- Page 25 and 26:
of residual asphalt (3). Additional
- Page 27 and 28:
Sabbagh and Lesser (1998) note that
- Page 29 and 30:
2.2.6 Plastics The plastic polymer
- Page 31 and 32:
high temperature performance, but w
- Page 33 and 34:
2.2.7 Polymer Blends Select polymer
- Page 35 and 36:
Table 2: Polymer Modification Metho
- Page 37 and 38:
Forbes et al found that asphalt emu
- Page 39 and 40:
Lubbers and Watson (2005) present t
- Page 41 and 42:
Takamura and Heckmann (1999) sugges
- Page 43 and 44:
Neat Asphalt + 8% LDPE1 + 8% LDPE2
- Page 45 and 46:
Figure 16: Effect of SBS Concentrat
- Page 47 and 48:
destruction of the polymer modifier
- Page 49 and 50:
emulsified and non-emulsified aspha
- Page 51 and 52:
However, in developing the SPG, Epp
- Page 53 and 54:
• Forced Air-Drying Method - This
- Page 55 and 56: • Wet Track Abrasion Loss - used
- Page 57 and 58: ductility (61). King characterizes
- Page 59 and 60: Polymer modified asphalt emulsions
- Page 61 and 62: 3 40-120º F 5.02 12.81 6.04 14.92
- Page 63 and 64: emulsions require a much longer set
- Page 65 and 66: Figure 20: Chip Seal Aggregate Rete
- Page 67 and 68: design specifications are meticulou
- Page 69 and 70: Holleran (n.d.) recommends using SB
- Page 71 and 72: 22 20 18 Vertical Displacement (%)
- Page 73 and 74: seal stone retention, and to provid
- Page 75 and 76: Microsurfacing applications by defi
- Page 77 and 78: Thus, the cohesive properties of SB
- Page 79 and 80: dimensional polymer network is pres
- Page 81 and 82: Moreover, although the moduli of th
- Page 83 and 84: Numerous decision tools and best pr
- Page 85 and 86: 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING AND SPECIFIC
- Page 87 and 88: and performance-related specificati
- Page 89 and 90: were consistently twice as high as
- Page 91 and 92: • Polymer/Asphalt Compatibility a
- Page 93 and 94: angle at the lowest pavement temper
- Page 95 and 96: damaged by temperature. The problem
- Page 97 and 98: Because the industry survey and oth
- Page 99 and 100: conforming to the following criteri
- Page 101 and 102: with faster curing and longer wear.
- Page 103 and 104: Table 17: Comparison of Microsurfac
- Page 105: Emulsion/Aggregate Performance Test
- Page 109 and 110: leading the negatives. If post-blen
- Page 111 and 112: opportunity to evaluate performance
- Page 113 and 114: traffic areas, as are durable, poli
- Page 115 and 116: esearchers, with the leading candid
- Page 117 and 118: Table 13 illustrates a draft Strawm
- Page 119 and 120: Laboratory Design Procedures • Ch
- Page 121 and 122: • Develop/improve performance met
- Page 123 and 124: specification tests will cost appro
- Page 125 and 126: PROPERTY TEST METHOD SPEC. RESULT B
- Page 127 and 128: 14. Takamura, Koichi, “SBR Latice
- Page 129 and 130: 38. Turk, Johannes, and Schmidt, Ma
- Page 131 and 132: 62. Desmazes, C., Lecomte, M., Lesu
- Page 133 and 134: 86. European Standard EN 14895, “