- Page 1 and 2: Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emul
- Page 3 and 4: 2.10 SURFACE TREATMENTS, DISTRESS,
- Page 5: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Needs to be Compl
- Page 9 and 10: 1. Compile published research on th
- Page 11 and 12: 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW OF POLYMER MO
- Page 13 and 14: the emulsion solution is termed the
- Page 15 and 16: molecular weights ranging up to 100
- Page 17 and 18: Elastomeric polymers exhibit a low
- Page 19 and 20: The first commercial process that w
- Page 21 and 22: 2.2.3 Synthetic Rubber and Latex Sy
- Page 23 and 24: Latex Modified Unmodified 80 Chip R
- Page 25 and 26: of residual asphalt (3). Additional
- Page 27 and 28: Sabbagh and Lesser (1998) note that
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 Plastics The plastic polymer
- Page 31 and 32: high temperature performance, but w
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2.7 Polymer Blends Select polymer
- Page 35 and 36: Table 2: Polymer Modification Metho
- Page 37 and 38: Forbes et al found that asphalt emu
- Page 39 and 40: Lubbers and Watson (2005) present t
- Page 41 and 42: Takamura and Heckmann (1999) sugges
- Page 43 and 44: Neat Asphalt + 8% LDPE1 + 8% LDPE2
- Page 45 and 46: Figure 16: Effect of SBS Concentrat
- Page 47 and 48: destruction of the polymer modifier
- Page 49 and 50: emulsified and non-emulsified aspha
- Page 51 and 52: However, in developing the SPG, Epp
- Page 53 and 54: • Forced Air-Drying Method - This
- Page 55 and 56: • Wet Track Abrasion Loss - used
- Page 57 and 58:
ductility (61). King characterizes
- Page 59 and 60:
Polymer modified asphalt emulsions
- Page 61 and 62:
3 40-120º F 5.02 12.81 6.04 14.92
- Page 63 and 64:
emulsions require a much longer set
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 20: Chip Seal Aggregate Rete
- Page 67 and 68:
design specifications are meticulou
- Page 69 and 70:
Holleran (n.d.) recommends using SB
- Page 71 and 72:
22 20 18 Vertical Displacement (%)
- Page 73 and 74:
seal stone retention, and to provid
- Page 75 and 76:
Microsurfacing applications by defi
- Page 77 and 78:
Thus, the cohesive properties of SB
- Page 79 and 80:
dimensional polymer network is pres
- Page 81 and 82:
Moreover, although the moduli of th
- Page 83 and 84:
Numerous decision tools and best pr
- Page 85 and 86:
3.0 LABORATORY TESTING AND SPECIFIC
- Page 87 and 88:
and performance-related specificati
- Page 89 and 90:
were consistently twice as high as
- Page 91 and 92:
• Polymer/Asphalt Compatibility a
- Page 93 and 94:
angle at the lowest pavement temper
- Page 95 and 96:
damaged by temperature. The problem
- Page 97 and 98:
Because the industry survey and oth
- Page 99 and 100:
conforming to the following criteri
- Page 101 and 102:
with faster curing and longer wear.
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 17: Comparison of Microsurfac
- Page 105 and 106:
Emulsion/Aggregate Performance Test
- Page 107 and 108:
the FLH report-only format be used
- Page 109 and 110:
leading the negatives. If post-blen
- Page 111 and 112:
opportunity to evaluate performance
- Page 113 and 114:
traffic areas, as are durable, poli
- Page 115 and 116:
esearchers, with the leading candid
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 13 illustrates a draft Strawm
- Page 119 and 120:
Laboratory Design Procedures • Ch
- Page 121 and 122:
• Develop/improve performance met
- Page 123 and 124:
specification tests will cost appro
- Page 125 and 126:
PROPERTY TEST METHOD SPEC. RESULT B
- Page 127 and 128:
14. Takamura, Koichi, “SBR Latice
- Page 129 and 130:
38. Turk, Johannes, and Schmidt, Ma
- Page 131 and 132:
62. Desmazes, C., Lecomte, M., Lesu
- Page 133 and 134:
86. European Standard EN 14895, “