06.10.2014 Views

Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In test mixes where 7% EVA was pre-blended with the asphalt b<strong>in</strong>der, Wegan reports<br />

observ<strong>in</strong>g the formation of a partial, yet dist<strong>in</strong>ct polymer network structure. Test<br />

samples conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g 18% pre-blended EVA exhibited an even greater degree of polymer<br />

network formation. These results appear to suggest that <strong>in</strong> contrast to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

the BASF and Forbes studies, modified asphalt b<strong>in</strong>ders produced by pre-blend<strong>in</strong>g may<br />

produce a cross-l<strong>in</strong>ked network structure, provid<strong>in</strong>g that the polymer content is<br />

sufficiently high. However, no <strong>in</strong>formation is provided by Wegan with respect to<br />

compar<strong>in</strong>g the performance of high polymer content pre-blended b<strong>in</strong>ders to<br />

conventionally modified lower content mixtures, or whether the <strong>in</strong>creased materials cost<br />

of this form of pre-blend justifies its use.<br />

Husse<strong>in</strong> (2005) has exam<strong>in</strong>ed the impact of polymer-asphalt blend<strong>in</strong>g time on PMA<br />

performance for vary<strong>in</strong>g molecular weight LDPE and EVA additives. Figure 14<br />

summarizes the change <strong>in</strong> complex shear modulus for various modified and neat<br />

asphalts relative to mix<strong>in</strong>g time. <strong>Polymer</strong> modified mixes exhibit significant and welldef<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> complex shear modulus (G*) as mix<strong>in</strong>g time is lengthened, until a<br />

critical po<strong>in</strong>t is reached where upon these improvements beg<strong>in</strong> to stabilize. For<br />

example, the steady-state po<strong>in</strong>ts for 8% LDPE1, 8% EVA1 and 8% EVA2 are<br />

approximately 30, 15, and 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes, respectively. In contrast, neat asphalt exhibits a<br />

virtually flat-l<strong>in</strong>e G* response over the same period. Husse<strong>in</strong> proposes that the po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

which represents stabilization <strong>in</strong> the magnitude of G*, is <strong>in</strong>dicative of the optimal<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g time for that polymer-modified mixture. Results <strong>in</strong>dicate that the optimal<br />

blend<strong>in</strong>g time for EVA-modified b<strong>in</strong>ders was generally less than for LDPE-modified<br />

mixtures, ow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> part, to the lower weight-average molecular weights of the former<br />

(35). Husse<strong>in</strong> also found that b<strong>in</strong>ders conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g low v<strong>in</strong>yl acetate content EVA<br />

additives exhibited the best high temperature susceptibility and long-term storage<br />

stability of the mixtures tested. However, little if any benefit was identified for these<br />

polymer additives at low temperatures.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!