Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

73. Maher, Michael, Marshall, Chris, Harrison, Frank, and Baumgartner, Kathy, “Context Sensitive Roadway Selection Guide”, FHWA CFLH Division Report No. FHWA-CFL/TD-0x-004, August 2005. 74. “Technical Recommendations for Highways: Design and Construction of Surfacing Seals”, South African National Roads Agency, Report TRH3, May 2007. 75. “Six Steps to a Better Chip Seal”, California Chip Seal Association, n.d. 76. Vonk, W., and Hartemink, R., “SBS-Modified Binders, Also Cost Effective in Hot Climates!”, Proceedings of the 8 th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for South Africa, Paper 023, ISBN 1-920-01718-6, September 2004. 77. Davies, E. and Laitinen, J., “A Laboratory Study into the Effects of Aging on the Durability of Modified Bitumens and Bitumen/Aggregate Mixtures”, Proceedings of the 2 nd International Conference on Road & Airfield Pavement Technology, September 1995. 78. “SADC Guideline on Low-volume Sealed Roads”, Southern African Development Community, July 2003. 79. Hicks, R. Gary, Seeds, Stephen B., and Peshkin, David G., “Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements”, Foundation for Pavement Preservation Report, June 2000. 80. Kucharek, Anton, Davidson, Keith, and Croteau, Jean-Martin, “Chip Sealing Systems: Improving Early Age Chip Retention”, Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, August 2006. 81. Salomon, Delmar, Zhai, Huachun, Corona, Joe and Catelllanos, Frank, “New Tools to Measure Emulsified Asphalt Properties”, Idaho Asphalt Supply, Inc., November 2004. 82. “Field Emulsion Viscosity Test”, Wyoming Department of Transportation (WYDOT) 538.0, Under Review. 83. Kadrmas, A., “Alternative Residue Test Methods for Slurry and Microsurfacing Emulsions”, Oral Presentation to the 35th Annual AEMA Meeting, Los Cabos, Mexico, February, 2008 . 84. European Standard EN 13074, “Bitumen and Bituminous Binders – Recovery of Binder from Bitumen Emulsions by Evaporation”, July 2002. 85. European Standard EN 13808, “Bitumen and Bituminous Binders – Framework for Specifying Cationic Bituminous Emulsions”, May 2005. 125
86. European Standard EN 14895, “Bitumen and Bituminous Binders – Stabilization of Binder from Bituminous Emulsions or from Cutback and Fluxed Bituminous Binders”, April 2006. 87. Harnsberger and Huang, Western Research Institute, Personal Communication, 2008. 88. Marasteanu, M. and Anderson, D., “Time-Temperature Dependence of Asphalt Binders – An Improved Model”, AAPT, vol. 65, p. 408, 1996. 89. ASTM D7405-08: Standard Test Method for Multiple Stress Creep and Recovery of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer. 90. Kim, Y. R. and Lee, J., “Optimizing Gradations for Surface Treatment”, Research Report No. FHWA/NC/2005-05, Final Report, North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), Raleigh, 2005. 91. Leach, D. R. and Blankenship, P., “Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Techniques,” Proceedings, Protect Our Investment, Forum for Pavement Preservation II, Foundation for Pavement Preservation (FP 2 ), San Diego, California, November 2001. 92. ASTM D7000-04: Standard Test Method for Sweep Test of Bituminous Emulsion Surface Treatment Samples, American Society for Testing and Materials, 2004. 93. Takamura, Koichi, BASF Corporation, Personal Communication, 2008. 94. Barnat, J., McCune, W. and Vopat, V., “The Sweep Test: A Performance Test for Chip Seals,” presented to the Asphalt Emulsion Manufacturers Association, San Diego, CA, February 2001. 95. Barnat, J., McCune, W., Vopat, V. and King, H., “Macro-Surfacing: An Innovative Emulsion Chemistry Surface Treatment”, Congress Proceedings, Third World Congress on Emulsion, 2002. 96. European Standard EN 12272-3:2003, Surface Dressing – test Method – Part 3: “Determination of Binder Aggregate Adhesivity by the Vialit Plate Shock Test Method“, 2003. 97. Davidson, J.K., Houston, G., Linton, P., Croteau, J.M., “An Overview of the Design of Emulsion Based Seal Coating Systems Available in Canada and Abroad”, CTAA, 50, 363-377, 2005. 126
Page 1 and 2:
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emul
Page 3 and 4:
2.10 SURFACE TREATMENTS, DISTRESS,
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Needs to be Compl
Page 7 and 8:
DISCLAIMER This document is dissemi
Page 9 and 10:
1. Compile published research on th
Page 11 and 12:
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW OF POLYMER MO
Page 13 and 14:
the emulsion solution is termed the
Page 15 and 16:
molecular weights ranging up to 100
Page 17 and 18:
Elastomeric polymers exhibit a low
Page 19 and 20:
The first commercial process that w
Page 21 and 22:
2.2.3 Synthetic Rubber and Latex Sy
Page 23 and 24:
Latex Modified Unmodified 80 Chip R
Page 25 and 26:
of residual asphalt (3). Additional
Page 27 and 28:
Sabbagh and Lesser (1998) note that
Page 29 and 30:
2.2.6 Plastics The plastic polymer
Page 31 and 32:
high temperature performance, but w
Page 33 and 34:
2.2.7 Polymer Blends Select polymer
Page 35 and 36:
Table 2: Polymer Modification Metho
Page 37 and 38:
Forbes et al found that asphalt emu
Page 39 and 40:
Lubbers and Watson (2005) present t
Page 41 and 42:
Takamura and Heckmann (1999) sugges
Page 43 and 44:
Neat Asphalt + 8% LDPE1 + 8% LDPE2
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 16: Effect of SBS Concentrat
Page 47 and 48:
destruction of the polymer modifier
Page 49 and 50:
emulsified and non-emulsified aspha
Page 51 and 52:
However, in developing the SPG, Epp
Page 53 and 54:
• Forced Air-Drying Method - This
Page 55 and 56:
• Wet Track Abrasion Loss - used
Page 57 and 58:
ductility (61). King characterizes
Page 59 and 60:
Polymer modified asphalt emulsions
Page 61 and 62:
3 40-120º F 5.02 12.81 6.04 14.92
Page 63 and 64:
emulsions require a much longer set
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 20: Chip Seal Aggregate Rete
Page 67 and 68:
design specifications are meticulou
Page 69 and 70:
Holleran (n.d.) recommends using SB
Page 71 and 72:
22 20 18 Vertical Displacement (%)
Page 73 and 74:
seal stone retention, and to provid
Page 75 and 76:
Microsurfacing applications by defi
Page 77 and 78:
Thus, the cohesive properties of SB
Page 79 and 80:
dimensional polymer network is pres
Page 81 and 82: Moreover, although the moduli of th
Page 83 and 84: Numerous decision tools and best pr
Page 85 and 86: 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING AND SPECIFIC
Page 87 and 88: and performance-related specificati
Page 89 and 90: were consistently twice as high as
Page 91 and 92: • Polymer/Asphalt Compatibility a
Page 93 and 94: angle at the lowest pavement temper
Page 95 and 96: damaged by temperature. The problem
Page 97 and 98: Because the industry survey and oth
Page 99 and 100: conforming to the following criteri
Page 101 and 102: with faster curing and longer wear.
Page 103 and 104: Table 17: Comparison of Microsurfac
Page 105 and 106: Emulsion/Aggregate Performance Test
Page 107 and 108: the FLH report-only format be used
Page 109 and 110: leading the negatives. If post-blen
Page 111 and 112: opportunity to evaluate performance
Page 113 and 114: traffic areas, as are durable, poli
Page 115 and 116: esearchers, with the leading candid
Page 117 and 118: Table 13 illustrates a draft Strawm
Page 119 and 120: Laboratory Design Procedures • Ch
Page 121 and 122: • Develop/improve performance met
Page 123 and 124: specification tests will cost appro
Page 125 and 126: PROPERTY TEST METHOD SPEC. RESULT B
Page 127 and 128: 14. Takamura, Koichi, “SBR Latice
Page 129 and 130: 38. Turk, Johannes, and Schmidt, Ma
Page 131: 62. Desmazes, C., Lecomte, M., Lesu
show all

Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?