Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 24: Testing Plan Protocols for 2008 Evaluations PROPERTY TEST METHOD SPEC. RESULT Asphalt Emulsion as Received Standard AASHTO or ASTM tests: AASHTO M-140 Emulsified Asphalt or AASHTO M-208 Cationic Emulsified Asphalt Field Viscosity Test WYDOT 538.0 Report Evaporative Method Residue (24 hours @ 25°C, 24 hours @ 60°C, Forced Draft Oven) Frequency Sweep Frequency Sweep AASHTO T 315 (25 mm, 0.1 – 100 rad/sec, 10% Strain) (G*, , etc…) HTG* Multiple Stress Creep Recovery % Recovery & Jnr at each TP 70-08 (100, 1000, 3200 & 10,000Pa) stress level Frequency Sweep Frequency Sweep AASHTO T 315 (25 mm, 0.1 – 100 rad/sec, 10% Strain) HTG Report (G*, , etc…) Multiple Stress Creep Recovery - 6°C % Recovery & Jnr at each TP 70-08 (100, 1000, 3200 & 10,000Pa) stress level Frequency Sweep Frequency Sweep AASHTO T 315 (25 mm, 0.1 – 100 rad/sec, 10% Strain) HTG (G*, , etc…) Multiple Stress Creep Recovery -12°C % Recovery & Jnr at each TP 70-08 (100, 1000, 3200 & 10,000Pa) stress level • Resistance to Deformation: G*/sind @ 12% Strain • Strain Tolerance: Strain Test Strain Sweep, 1 – 50% strain, 10 rad/s 25ºC Level at which G* < 90% G* initial • Failure Properties: Strain Level at which G*
PROPERTY TEST METHOD SPEC. RESULT Bending Beam Rheometer -12°C + -18°C AASHTO T 313 Stiffness + m-value Performance tests for Chip Seals Sweep Test Modified ASTM D-7000 Report Performance tests for Polymer Modified Slurry Seals and Micro-Surfacing Recommended Performance Guidelines for Emulsified Asphalt Slurry Seal Surfaces ISSA A105 ISSA Recommended Performance Guidelines for Polymer Modified Micro-Surfacing ISSA A143 ISSA Tests recommended by Caltrans Slurry/Micro-Surface Mix Design Procedure Project /Contract 65A0151 TBD 118
Page 1 and 2:
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emul
Page 3 and 4:
2.10 SURFACE TREATMENTS, DISTRESS,
Page 5 and 6:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Needs to be Compl
Page 7 and 8:
DISCLAIMER This document is dissemi
Page 9 and 10:
1. Compile published research on th
Page 11 and 12:
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW OF POLYMER MO
Page 13 and 14:
the emulsion solution is termed the
Page 15 and 16:
molecular weights ranging up to 100
Page 17 and 18:
Elastomeric polymers exhibit a low
Page 19 and 20:
The first commercial process that w
Page 21 and 22:
2.2.3 Synthetic Rubber and Latex Sy
Page 23 and 24:
Latex Modified Unmodified 80 Chip R
Page 25 and 26:
of residual asphalt (3). Additional
Page 27 and 28:
Sabbagh and Lesser (1998) note that
Page 29 and 30:
2.2.6 Plastics The plastic polymer
Page 31 and 32:
high temperature performance, but w
Page 33 and 34:
2.2.7 Polymer Blends Select polymer
Page 35 and 36:
Table 2: Polymer Modification Metho
Page 37 and 38:
Forbes et al found that asphalt emu
Page 39 and 40:
Lubbers and Watson (2005) present t
Page 41 and 42:
Takamura and Heckmann (1999) sugges
Page 43 and 44:
Neat Asphalt + 8% LDPE1 + 8% LDPE2
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 16: Effect of SBS Concentrat
Page 47 and 48:
destruction of the polymer modifier
Page 49 and 50:
emulsified and non-emulsified aspha
Page 51 and 52:
However, in developing the SPG, Epp
Page 53 and 54:
• Forced Air-Drying Method - This
Page 55 and 56:
• Wet Track Abrasion Loss - used
Page 57 and 58:
ductility (61). King characterizes
Page 59 and 60:
Polymer modified asphalt emulsions
Page 61 and 62:
3 40-120º F 5.02 12.81 6.04 14.92
Page 63 and 64:
emulsions require a much longer set
Page 65 and 66:
Figure 20: Chip Seal Aggregate Rete
Page 67 and 68:
design specifications are meticulou
Page 69 and 70:
Holleran (n.d.) recommends using SB
Page 71 and 72:
22 20 18 Vertical Displacement (%)
Page 73 and 74: seal stone retention, and to provid
Page 75 and 76: Microsurfacing applications by defi
Page 77 and 78: Thus, the cohesive properties of SB
Page 79 and 80: dimensional polymer network is pres
Page 81 and 82: Moreover, although the moduli of th
Page 83 and 84: Numerous decision tools and best pr
Page 85 and 86: 3.0 LABORATORY TESTING AND SPECIFIC
Page 87 and 88: and performance-related specificati
Page 89 and 90: were consistently twice as high as
Page 91 and 92: • Polymer/Asphalt Compatibility a
Page 93 and 94: angle at the lowest pavement temper
Page 95 and 96: damaged by temperature. The problem
Page 97 and 98: Because the industry survey and oth
Page 99 and 100: conforming to the following criteri
Page 101 and 102: with faster curing and longer wear.
Page 103 and 104: Table 17: Comparison of Microsurfac
Page 105 and 106: Emulsion/Aggregate Performance Test
Page 107 and 108: the FLH report-only format be used
Page 109 and 110: leading the negatives. If post-blen
Page 111 and 112: opportunity to evaluate performance
Page 113 and 114: traffic areas, as are durable, poli
Page 115 and 116: esearchers, with the leading candid
Page 117 and 118: Table 13 illustrates a draft Strawm
Page 119 and 120: Laboratory Design Procedures • Ch
Page 121 and 122: • Develop/improve performance met
Page 123: specification tests will cost appro
Page 127 and 128: 14. Takamura, Koichi, “SBR Latice
Page 129 and 130: 38. Turk, Johannes, and Schmidt, Ma
Page 131 and 132: 62. Desmazes, C., Lecomte, M., Lesu
Page 133 and 134: 86. European Standard EN 14895, “
show all

Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?