Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Holleran (n.d.) recommends us<strong>in</strong>g SBR or EVA <strong>in</strong> microsurfac<strong>in</strong>gs at a concentration of<br />
1% to 5% depend<strong>in</strong>g upon the application; not<strong>in</strong>g that 3% to 5% polymer concentrations<br />
will offer the most significant improvements (70). Figure 23 presents wet track abrasion<br />
losses for 3% SBR, SBS, Neoprene, and NRL modified surfac<strong>in</strong>g treatments <strong>in</strong><br />
comparison to an unmodified asphalt emulsion. A mixture modified with 3% SBR can<br />
reduce abrasion losses by up to 67% over unmodified asphalt after a 6 day soak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
period. Similarly, Neoprene and SBS modifiers improve abrasion losses by 40% to<br />
50%. These results <strong>in</strong>dicate that PME offers significantly <strong>in</strong>creased adhesion<br />
(translat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to better stone retention) and water resistance than unmodified asphalt<br />
emulsions <strong>in</strong> slurry seal applications.<br />
With respect to flush<strong>in</strong>g, Holleran has shown that loaded wheel test results produce<br />
significant improvements <strong>in</strong> vertical displacement for 3% PME over neat asphalt -<br />
particularly for SBR and EVA modified mixtures (Figure 24) (70).<br />
1 Hour Soak 6 Day Soak<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
Abrasion Loss<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
<strong>Asphalt</strong> SBR SBS Neoprene NRL<br />
Figure 23: Wet Track Abrasion Losses (70)<br />
62