Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...
Using Polymer Modified Asphalt Emulsions in Surface Treatments A ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
• Block Crack<strong>in</strong>g;<br />
• Rutt<strong>in</strong>g (caused by high pavement temperatures <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with tight,<br />
relatively stationary wheel turns); and<br />
• Oxidation.<br />
Crack<strong>in</strong>g and oxidation are also found on hik<strong>in</strong>g trails and bike paths, with the former<br />
represent<strong>in</strong>g the most common and problematic form of distress.<br />
FLH reports that slurry seals <strong>in</strong> particular, are the favored preventive ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
treatment applied to park<strong>in</strong>g lot pavements, ow<strong>in</strong>g to their ability to waterproof the<br />
underly<strong>in</strong>g base pavement while reduc<strong>in</strong>g closed-to-traffic times, reduc<strong>in</strong>g energy<br />
consumption, and m<strong>in</strong>imiz<strong>in</strong>g environmental impacts.<br />
As the research presented elsewhere <strong>in</strong> this report clearly illustrates, the use of PME <strong>in</strong><br />
th<strong>in</strong> surface treatments does appear to enhance stone retention, improve low<br />
temperature susceptibility, and reduce the effects of high temperature deformation (i.e.,<br />
rutt<strong>in</strong>g). Moreover, PME-based slurry has been anecdotally found to cure at a<br />
somewhat faster rate than its non-modified counterparts (thereby reduc<strong>in</strong>g closed-totraffic<br />
times). Thus, it is reasonable to conclude that the use of PME could be expected<br />
to provide similar benefits <strong>in</strong> non-roadway applications, although it is not possible at this<br />
time to assess the result<strong>in</strong>g cost-benefit implications.<br />
2.8 Climate, Environmental and Tim<strong>in</strong>g Considerations<br />
Serfass et al (1992) have exam<strong>in</strong>ed the impact of climate on stone retention <strong>in</strong> surface<br />
dress<strong>in</strong>gs us<strong>in</strong>g SBS-modified hot mixes and emulsified asphalt (18). In modified hot<br />
mixes, the researchers note that an adequate period of warm weather is required to<br />
facilitate the evaporation of aromatics to allow aggregate to “firm” <strong>in</strong>to its f<strong>in</strong>al position.<br />
The researchers recommend an application period extend<strong>in</strong>g from late May to late<br />
August <strong>in</strong> northern or mounta<strong>in</strong>ous climates, and mid-May to mid-September <strong>in</strong><br />
southern regions for modified hot mix asphalt b<strong>in</strong>ders (18). Conversely, SBS-modified<br />
emulsions were found to exhibit good stone retention characteristics even at relatively<br />
cool temperatures and high humidity as determ<strong>in</strong>ed through Vialit cohesive test<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
69