02.11.2012 Views

Handover mechanisms in next generation heterogeneous wireless ...

Handover mechanisms in next generation heterogeneous wireless ...

Handover mechanisms in next generation heterogeneous wireless ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRUST ASSISTED HANDOVER ALGORITHM FOR RELIABLE HANDOVER<br />

the moment a mobile user loses its connection with the old POA (oPOA) to the time it<br />

receives the first packet from the new POA (nPOA). To analyse handover delay, a<br />

system model is developed.<br />

In a typical “break-before-make” handover scenario of the <strong>in</strong>terconnected WLAN-<br />

UMTS network, handover delay comprises of the follow<strong>in</strong>g major components:<br />

Movement Detection (MD): Movement detection delay ( t MD ) is the period of time<br />

taken on decid<strong>in</strong>g whether a mobile user has moved to a different network. Due to the<br />

asymmetry of move-<strong>in</strong> and move-out handover scenarios [89] <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terconnected<br />

WLAN-UMTS network, WLAN�UMTS and UMTS�WLAN handover mean<br />

different movement detection latencies. In Mobile IPv4 specification [21], two<br />

algorithms have been specified with regard to movement detection. In the first method,<br />

a mobile user checks agent advertisement lifetime (ADF) periodically. Upon the<br />

expiration of ADF, it assumes that it has lost contact with the agent router. In the second<br />

approach, the network prefix of the advertisements from the nPOA is compared with the<br />

network prefix of the oPOA. A change <strong>in</strong> network prefix would imply that the mobile<br />

user may have moved to another subnet. In this study, it is assumed that the first method<br />

is applied to WLAN�UMTS handover and handover between homogeneous networks.<br />

While, for UMTS�WLAN handover, t MD is equal to 0 because discover<strong>in</strong>g a WLAN<br />

nPOA would not cause transmission <strong>in</strong>terruption if a second <strong>in</strong>terface is employed.<br />

Network Selection (NS): Network selection delay ( t ) is denoted as the time required<br />

for network solicitation (L2+L3) (� ) <strong>in</strong> absence of the valid router advertisements from<br />

the nPOA, plus handover decision mak<strong>in</strong>g time ( � ) at mobile term<strong>in</strong>als. Mobile<br />

term<strong>in</strong>als with multiple network <strong>in</strong>terfaces [92] can be enabled to conduct network<br />

solicitation us<strong>in</strong>g a standby <strong>in</strong>terface, while carry<strong>in</strong>g data traffic on the primary<br />

<strong>in</strong>terface simultaneously. To simplify the analysis, it is assumed that handover occurs<br />

only between <strong>heterogeneous</strong> <strong>wireless</strong> networks. When multiple <strong>in</strong>terfaces are<br />

simultaneously used [92], network solicitation can be completed prelim<strong>in</strong>arily ( � � 0 ).<br />

While, � is often a constant determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the comput<strong>in</strong>g power of mobile term<strong>in</strong>als.<br />

Therefore, t<br />

is believed to be able to rema<strong>in</strong> unchanged because handover decision<br />

NS<br />

can be made <strong>in</strong>dependent of network discovery.<br />

- 95 -<br />

NS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!