02.11.2012 Views

Handover mechanisms in next generation heterogeneous wireless ...

Handover mechanisms in next generation heterogeneous wireless ...

Handover mechanisms in next generation heterogeneous wireless ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TRUST ASSISTED HANDOVER ALGORITHM FOR RELIABLE HANDOVER<br />

with each other. As such, mobile term<strong>in</strong>als need to deal with both the heterogeneities of<br />

network<strong>in</strong>g technologies and the multiplicities of network operators. Network selection<br />

coupled with trust relationship would become a prom<strong>in</strong>ent issue for roam<strong>in</strong>g mobile<br />

users.<br />

The network selection issue <strong>in</strong> <strong>heterogeneous</strong> <strong>wireless</strong> networks has raised a lot of<br />

concerns <strong>in</strong> the 3GPP specifications [72, 91] for Public Land Mobile Network (PLMN)<br />

and WLAN <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g. In 3GPP, it is proposed that network identity lists that are<br />

either user controlled or operator controlled can be used for network selection by mobile<br />

users. However, the 3GPP solutions provide very limited support to the multiplicity of<br />

network operators <strong>in</strong> NG <strong>wireless</strong> networks. State-of-the-art handover algorithms such<br />

as the MHOA, aims at optimis<strong>in</strong>g QoS by mitigat<strong>in</strong>g technology heterogeneity caused<br />

by the <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g. Unfortunately, they have not taken <strong>in</strong>to account complex network<br />

trust relationships between multiple network operators, and thus are <strong>in</strong>effective <strong>in</strong><br />

resolv<strong>in</strong>g the multiplicity problem.<br />

<strong>Handover</strong> failure occurs <strong>in</strong> two possible cases when a mobile user attempts to attach to<br />

its selected network <strong>in</strong> a handover. In the first case (Case A), handover authentication<br />

can fail <strong>in</strong> the absence of roam<strong>in</strong>g agreements between the selected access network and<br />

the home network of the roam<strong>in</strong>g user. This can be promptly detected by the AAA<br />

functions at visited networks. In contrast, <strong>in</strong> the second case (Case B), the HAAA may<br />

refuses access to the user-selected network, especially if a f<strong>in</strong>e-gra<strong>in</strong>ed AAA policy is<br />

applied for security reasons. In this case, a long AAA delay would be expected because<br />

the HAAA is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the validation. In both cases, the mobile user would be forced<br />

to reselect another network for roam<strong>in</strong>g related access. Obviously, the mobile user<br />

would likely have missed the best time for trigger<strong>in</strong>g handover. Long <strong>in</strong>terruption <strong>in</strong><br />

connections would <strong>in</strong>cur as a consequence.<br />

Generally, for the mobile-controlled handover, the unawareness of the network trust<br />

relationship between a candidate network and the home network can cause unnecessary<br />

handover attempts. This <strong>in</strong>evitably <strong>in</strong>creases signall<strong>in</strong>g overheads and results <strong>in</strong> a long<br />

latency <strong>in</strong> a handover. Thus, the MHOA may become <strong>in</strong>efficient and has limited<br />

scalability <strong>in</strong> a multi-technology and multi-operator environment. Current handover<br />

approaches take <strong>in</strong>to account the heterogeneities of access technologies of <strong>in</strong>terwork<strong>in</strong>g<br />

- 87 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!