Women's Employment - United Nations Research Institute for Social ...
Women's Employment - United Nations Research Institute for Social ...
Women's Employment - United Nations Research Institute for Social ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Women’s employment in the textile manufacturing sectors of Bangladesh and Morocco<br />
owners that, if they had to go <strong>for</strong> this kind of pre-emptive attack,<br />
they did so be<strong>for</strong>e the submission of the application <strong>for</strong> registration,<br />
because once the application <strong>for</strong> registration was submitted, it would<br />
have become not only more difficult <strong>for</strong> the owners to stop the process<br />
of unionization but any attempt to do so could have also made them<br />
subject to legal prosecution <strong>for</strong> misconduct under Article 15 of the<br />
Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. As Table 9 further reveals, the<br />
owners also had their in<strong>for</strong>mants in the office of the Registrar of Trade<br />
Unions, who in<strong>for</strong>med the owners as soon as they learned about the<br />
submission of the applications <strong>for</strong> registration. In most cases, the<br />
owners then traced the office bearers who were involved in the<br />
unionization process and tried to stop the process in various ways.<br />
Table 9:<br />
How the owners came to know about unionization procedures<br />
Channels through which owners came<br />
to know about unionization<br />
No. of respondent unit unions<br />
Through the agents of the owners<br />
among the workers 7<br />
Through unofficial channels of the office<br />
of the Registrar of Trade Unions 15<br />
In<strong>for</strong>med by the union leaders<br />
themselves after obtaining Registration<br />
Certificates 6<br />
We were in<strong>for</strong>med by federations and/or unit level leaders that<br />
in the cases that the owners were not in<strong>for</strong>med be<strong>for</strong>ehand of the<br />
unionization process, either the office bearers of the unit unions or<br />
the federations bribed officials at the Registrar of Trade Unions, or<br />
the federations had such political backing that the officials of the<br />
Registrar of Trade Unions did not dare to disclose the in<strong>for</strong>mation to<br />
owners. The general response of the owners, as described to us by the<br />
federation and unit union leaders, are discussed in Table 10. The<br />
majority of our respondent owners did not agree with the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
provided in Table 10. Some owners did not contradict the authenticity<br />
of the in<strong>for</strong>mation, but claimed that they themselves never resorted<br />
to any such activity.<br />
The findings below clearly show that owners used all sorts of<br />
possible methods to stop the unionization process, and also to destroy,<br />
wherever they could, the unit unions. To achieve their goals, they<br />
first tried to employ pressure tactics, including verbal threats, physical<br />
206