23.10.2014 Views

Women's Employment - United Nations Research Institute for Social ...

Women's Employment - United Nations Research Institute for Social ...

Women's Employment - United Nations Research Institute for Social ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Women’s employment in the textile manufacturing sectors of Bangladesh and Morocco<br />

owners that, if they had to go <strong>for</strong> this kind of pre-emptive attack,<br />

they did so be<strong>for</strong>e the submission of the application <strong>for</strong> registration,<br />

because once the application <strong>for</strong> registration was submitted, it would<br />

have become not only more difficult <strong>for</strong> the owners to stop the process<br />

of unionization but any attempt to do so could have also made them<br />

subject to legal prosecution <strong>for</strong> misconduct under Article 15 of the<br />

Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. As Table 9 further reveals, the<br />

owners also had their in<strong>for</strong>mants in the office of the Registrar of Trade<br />

Unions, who in<strong>for</strong>med the owners as soon as they learned about the<br />

submission of the applications <strong>for</strong> registration. In most cases, the<br />

owners then traced the office bearers who were involved in the<br />

unionization process and tried to stop the process in various ways.<br />

Table 9:<br />

How the owners came to know about unionization procedures<br />

Channels through which owners came<br />

to know about unionization<br />

No. of respondent unit unions<br />

Through the agents of the owners<br />

among the workers 7<br />

Through unofficial channels of the office<br />

of the Registrar of Trade Unions 15<br />

In<strong>for</strong>med by the union leaders<br />

themselves after obtaining Registration<br />

Certificates 6<br />

We were in<strong>for</strong>med by federations and/or unit level leaders that<br />

in the cases that the owners were not in<strong>for</strong>med be<strong>for</strong>ehand of the<br />

unionization process, either the office bearers of the unit unions or<br />

the federations bribed officials at the Registrar of Trade Unions, or<br />

the federations had such political backing that the officials of the<br />

Registrar of Trade Unions did not dare to disclose the in<strong>for</strong>mation to<br />

owners. The general response of the owners, as described to us by the<br />

federation and unit union leaders, are discussed in Table 10. The<br />

majority of our respondent owners did not agree with the in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

provided in Table 10. Some owners did not contradict the authenticity<br />

of the in<strong>for</strong>mation, but claimed that they themselves never resorted<br />

to any such activity.<br />

The findings below clearly show that owners used all sorts of<br />

possible methods to stop the unionization process, and also to destroy,<br />

wherever they could, the unit unions. To achieve their goals, they<br />

first tried to employ pressure tactics, including verbal threats, physical<br />

206

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!