27.10.2014 Views

Room for Savings: Optimizing Hotel Spend - Carlson

Room for Savings: Optimizing Hotel Spend - Carlson

Room for Savings: Optimizing Hotel Spend - Carlson

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GDS rate squatting. Regular GDS audits can<br />

also help companies manage the problem of<br />

rate squatting, which occurs when GDS<br />

codes intended <strong>for</strong> a company’s preferred<br />

hotels are used by non-preferred properties.<br />

Rate squatting occurs, <strong>for</strong> example, when a<br />

hotel uploads rates after an agreement has<br />

expired or when a chain uses a preferred<br />

provider code <strong>for</strong> individual properties that<br />

are not included in its contract with the<br />

company.<br />

TMCs use robot technology to scan GDSs<br />

and flag squatter rates. In this way, a CWT<br />

study of two global companies’ transactions<br />

made via a GDS showed three squatter<br />

hotels <strong>for</strong> every preferred hotel. Furthermore,<br />

squatter hotels accounted <strong>for</strong> 4-5 percent<br />

of their 9,000 bookings. Further analysis<br />

revealed that a large share of those<br />

transactions involved a small number of<br />

squatters: in one case, nearly half of the<br />

rogue transactions involved 7 out of 50<br />

squatter hotels. In the same example,<br />

squatter rates were on average 21 percent<br />

higher than the average rate paid at preferred<br />

properties in the same city, as shown in<br />

Figure 120. It can pay there<strong>for</strong>e to identify<br />

rate squatters and work with hoteliers to<br />

resolve such problems.<br />

Figure 120: One company paid on average 21% higher rates at squatter hotels vs. the average<br />

rate paid at preferred hotels<br />

Difference between average rates paid at the top 7 squatter hotels and preferred hotels<br />

(Company G - November 2008)<br />

<strong>Hotel</strong><br />

City<br />

City covered<br />

by program<br />

Number of<br />

transactions<br />

ARR paid at<br />

squatter hotels<br />

(US$)<br />

ARR paid at<br />

preferred<br />

hotels (US$)<br />

Price<br />

difference<br />

(%)<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Krakow No 5 182 - -<br />

London Yes<br />

15 342 238 44%<br />

C Milan Yes 9 244 249 -2%<br />

D<br />

E<br />

Milan Yes 6 170 249 -32%<br />

Oslo Yes 14 339 253 34%<br />

F<br />

Rivas-<br />

Vaciamadrid<br />

No 8 104 - -<br />

G<br />

Average room<br />

rate (weighted by<br />

number of<br />

transactions)<br />

Zurich Yes 6 259 214 22%<br />

293 243 21%<br />

* In cities covered by the program<br />

Source: CWT Travel Management Institute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!