27.10.2014 Views

Room for Savings: Optimizing Hotel Spend - Carlson

Room for Savings: Optimizing Hotel Spend - Carlson

Room for Savings: Optimizing Hotel Spend - Carlson

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Ask travelers to use serviced<br />

apartments <strong>for</strong> stays exceeding five<br />

nights<br />

Serviced apartments can provide a cost-effective<br />

solution <strong>for</strong> travelers staying longer than five<br />

nights, when the cost of accommodations and<br />

meal expenses are taken into account. These<br />

furnished apartments tend to provide similar<br />

amenities to hotels while providing a more<br />

relaxed, productive working environment <strong>for</strong><br />

travelers.<br />

3. Provide guidelines on what to do<br />

when a preferred property is<br />

unavailable<br />

Travelers cannot always book at preferred<br />

properties, which may be fully booked or simply<br />

not exist at their destination. In these cases, CWT<br />

recommends three main guidelines:<br />

Ask travelers to use a preferred chain so<br />

the company still benefits from preferred<br />

rates, although chain deals tend to provide<br />

lower savings than property deals. This is<br />

discussed further on Pages 82-86.<br />

Set a price limit <strong>for</strong> travelers to respect if<br />

booking outside preferred properties or<br />

chains. CWT research shows that city caps<br />

can be an effective way to limit spend when<br />

travelers have to book outside the program.<br />

Although the average room rate paid in a city<br />

usually exceeds the negotiated rate(s), the<br />

difference is smaller <strong>for</strong> companies that use<br />

city caps (16 percent <strong>for</strong> those that do<br />

compared to 34 percent <strong>for</strong> those that do<br />

not, as seen in Figure 40).<br />

CWT recommends setting city caps mainly<br />

<strong>for</strong> cities that are not covered by the hotel<br />

program (i.e., the company has no preferred<br />

properties there) and not cities that are<br />

covered. This is to limit the temptation <strong>for</strong><br />

travelers to book non-preferred hotels when<br />

preferred hotels are available. To set these<br />

city caps, it is useful to analyze benchmarking<br />

data provided by the TMC to determine the<br />

average room rate paid by companies <strong>for</strong><br />

each relevant hotel category in each city<br />

concerned. These rates can be used as city<br />

caps.<br />

Some companies also set caps <strong>for</strong> cities that<br />

are covered by the program. To do so, they<br />

identify their average, lowest and highest<br />

negotiated rates in the cities concerned. The<br />

rate cap they set then depends on their<br />

strategy. Companies that wish to penalize<br />

travelers who book too late to obtain a room<br />

at a preferred hotel set the lowest city caps—<br />

sometimes even 10 percent lower than their<br />

lowest negotiated rate. At the other end of<br />

the scale, some companies may wish to set<br />

more generous city caps, especially in cities<br />

where occupancy is high and travelers may<br />

have difficulty obtaining a room at the<br />

negotiated rate.<br />

Although it is best to define spend limits at a<br />

city level, it may be appropriate to use<br />

country caps as well (i.e., city caps <strong>for</strong> key<br />

destinations and a country cap <strong>for</strong> all<br />

remaining locations).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!