PDF File - GEC

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Step 4: Common practice analysis (1) Sub-step 4a: Analyze other activities similar to the proposed project activity: (a) Project participants are to provide an analysis of any other activities that are operational and that are similar to the proposed project activity. Projects are considered similar if they are in the same country/region and/or rely on a broadly similar technology, are of a similar scale, and take place in a comparable environment with respect to regulatory framework, investment climate, access to technology, access to financing, etc. Other CDM project activities are not to be included in this analysis. Documented evidence and, where relevant, quantitative information are to be provided. On the basis of that analysis, the project participants describe whether and to which extent similar activities have already diffused in the relevant region. (2) Sub-step 4b: Discuss any similar options that are occurring: (a) If similar activities are identified above, then it is necessary to demonstrate why the existence of these activities does not contradict the claim that the proposed project activity is financially/economically unattractive or subject to barriers. This can be done by comparing the proposed project activity to the other similar activities, and pointing out and explaining essential distinctions between them that explain why the similar activities enjoyed certain benefits that rendered it financially/economically attractive (e.g. subsidies or other financial flows) and which the proposed activity cannot use or did not face the barriers to which the proposed project activity is subject. If necessary data/information of some similar projects are not accessible for PPs to conduct this analysis, such projects can be excluded from this analysis. In case similar projects are not accessible, the PDD should include justification about non-accessibility of data/information. (b) Essential distinctions may include a serious change in circumstances under which the proposed CDM project activity will be implemented when compared to circumstances under which similar projects were carried out. For example, new barriers may have arisen, or promotional policies may have ended, leading to a situation in which the proposed CDM project activity would not be implemented without the incentive provided by the CDM. The change must be fundamental and verifiable. If Sub-steps 4a and 4b are satisfied, i.e. (i) similar activities cannot be observed or (ii) similar activities are observed, but essential distinctions between the project activity and similar activities can reasonably be explained, then the proposed project activity is additional. 112
6. Tools referenced in different methodologies Legend for Methodology related Tools: No. I. Title of Methodology related Tools 1 Tool for the demonstration and assessment of additionality 2 Combined tool to identify the baseline scenario and demonstrate additionality 3 Tool to calculate project or leakage CO 2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion 4 Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site 5 Tool to calculate baseline, project and/or leakage emissions from electricity consumption 6 Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane 7 Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system Table A-12 List of Large Scale CDM Methodologies (as of 28 Oct 08) Meth. No. Ver. Title of the Methodology 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AM0001 5.2 Incineration of HFC 23 Waste Streams AM0007 1 Analysis of the least-cost fuel option for seasonally-operating biomass cogeneration plants AM0009 3.2 Recovery and utilization of gas from oil wells that would otherwise be flared AM0014 4 Natural gas-based package cogeneration AM0017 2 Steam system efficiency improvements by replacing steam traps and returning condensate AM0018 2.2 Steam optimization systems AM0019 2 Renewable energy project activities replacing part of the electricity production of one single fossil-fuel-fired power plant that stands alone or supplies electricity to a grid, excluding biomass projects AM0020 2 Baseline methodology for water pumping efficiency improvements AM0021 2.2 Baseline Methodology for decomposition of N 2 O from existing adipic acid production plants AM0023 2 Leak reduction from natural gas pipeline compressor or gate stations AM0024 2 Baseline methodology for greenhouse gas reductions through waste heat recovery and utilization for power generation at cement plants AM0025 10 Avoided emissions from organic waste through alternative waste treatment processes AM0026 3 Methodology for zero-emissions grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources in Chile or in countries with merit order based dispatch grid AM0027 2.1 Substitution of CO 2 from fossil or mineral origin by CO 2 from renewable sources in the production of inorganic compounds AM0028 4.2 Catalytic N 2 O destruction in the tail gas of Nitric Acid Plants AM0029 3 Grid Connected Electricity Generation Plants using Natural Gas AM0030 2 PFC emission reductions from anode effect mitigation at primary aluminium smelting facilities AM0031 1 Baseline Methodology for Bus Rapid Transit Projects AM0034 3.1 Catalytic reduction of N 2 O inside the ammonia burner of nitric acid plants AM0035 1 SF 6 Emission Reductions in Electrical Grids AM0036 2.1 Fuel switch from fossil fuels to biomass residues in boilers for heat generation AM0037 2.1 Flare (or vent) reduction and gas utilization of gas from oil wells as a feedstock AM0038 2 Methodology for improved electrical energy efficiency of an existing submerged electric arc furnace used for the production of SiMn AM0039 2 Methane emissions reduction from organic waste water and bioorganic solid waste using cocomposting AM0041 1 Mitigation of Methane Emissions in the Wood Carbonization Activity for Charcoal Production AM0042 2 Grid-connected electricity generation using biomass from newly developed dedicated plantations AM0043 2 Leak reduction from a natural gas distribution grid by replacing old cast iron pipes with polyethylene pipes AM0044 1 Energy efficiency improvement projects: boiler rehabilitation or replacement in industrial and district heating sectors AM0045 2 Grid connection of isolated electricity systems AM0046 2 Distribution of efficient light bulbs to households AM0047 2 Production of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel for use as fuel AM0048 2 New cogeneration facilities supplying electricity and/or steam to multiple customers and displacing grid/off-grid steam and electricity generation with more carbon-intensive fuels 1 113
Page 1:
CDM/JI Manual 2 0 0 8 for Project D
Page 4 and 5:
Table of Contents Preface .........
Page 6 and 7:
Table A-8 Examples of ACM0001 appli
Page 9 and 10:
1.1 What is CDM? 1.2 Key Concepts o
Page 11 and 12:
CDM is the only Kyoto Protocol mech
Page 13 and 14:
to the Kyoto Protocol. Since the EB
Page 15 and 16:
This list may be further modified i
Page 17 and 18:
CDM Project Activities ( for Emissi
Page 19 and 20:
CDM project participants DOE UNFCCC
Page 21 and 22:
1.4.4 Validation and registration o
Page 23 and 24:
(b) It shall be finalized no later
Page 25 and 26:
(g) The step by step calculation (h
Page 27 and 28:
equal to the verified amount of GHG
Page 29 and 30:
(c) The secretariat shall establish
Page 31:
Project finding and assessment Larg
Page 34 and 35:
2.1 CDM typology CDM project activi
Page 36 and 37:
(2) Type II: Energy efficiency impr
Page 38 and 39:
For detailed procedural instruction
Page 40 and 41:
Form • A form with information re
Page 42 and 43:
2.3 Programme of activities (PoA) a
Page 44 and 45:
2.3.12 Guidelines (a) Guidance on t
Page 46 and 47:
(a) Net GHG removals by sinks of le
Page 48 and 49:
(CDM-AR-SSC-PDD) and Guidelines for
Page 50 and 51:
3.1 Overview of the PDD Project par
Page 52 and 53:
3.2.2 Selecting the methodology [PD
Page 54 and 55:
Only “Type E+” national and/or
Page 56 and 57:
Choice of scenarios/cases: Project
Page 58 and 59:
(a) Data unit (b) Description of th
Page 60 and 61:
Box 3-1: Retroactive crediting It w
Page 62 and 63:
3.6 A/R CDM project activities: Tec
Page 64 and 65:
Issuance of tCERs GHG removals by s
Page 66 and 67:
The EB agreed to the methodological
Page 68 and 69:
The “Tool for the demonstration a
Page 70 and 71: This analysis should include, where
Page 72 and 73: 4.1 What is JI? 4.1.1. General The
Page 74 and 75: 4.2. JI institutions and procedures
Page 76 and 77: (5) Accreditation Panel (JI-AP) JIS
Page 78 and 79: enhancements of removals for the pr
Page 80 and 81: (1) Baseline Setting Criteria for b
Page 82 and 83: activity or due to force majeure. (
Page 84 and 85: levels and be presented in a transp
Page 86 and 87: (5) Crediting period (a) Projects s
Page 88 and 89: 4.5. JI land use, land-use change a
Page 90 and 91: (RMUs) 18 previously issued by that
Page 92 and 93: provided that these unaccounted poo
Page 95 and 96: 1 List of necessary forms and relat
Page 97 and 98: 2 Approved Methodologies Legend for
Page 99 and 100: Meth. No. Scope Main Keywords Place
Page 101 and 102: Legend for Scope column: No. Sector
Page 103 and 104: 3 Methodological Tools Table A-7 Li
Page 105 and 106: Title and Version Number 2. Combine
Page 107 and 108: Title and Version Number 10. Proced
Page 109 and 110: 4 Application of baseline methodolo
Page 111 and 112: If LFG is used for generation of el
Page 113 and 114: (b) In cases where regulatory or co
Page 115 and 116: (7) CEF ther,BL,y CO 2 emissions in
Page 117 and 118: 5. Tool for the demonstration and a
Page 119: so that a reader can reproduce the
Page 123 and 124: Legend for Methodology related Tool
Page 125 and 126: 7. List of Guidance Table A-15 List
show all

PDF File - GEC

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?