29.10.2014 Views

PDF File - GEC

PDF File - GEC

PDF File - GEC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

carbon pools within the project boundary, but project participants may choose not to account<br />

for one or more carbon pools if they provide transparent and verifiable information showing<br />

that the choice will not increase the expected net GHG removals. The general characteristics of<br />

a baseline are contained in paragraphs 20 to 22 of the CDM A/R M&P.<br />

Establishment of Baseline net GHG removals<br />

The baseline GHG removals for a proposed A/R CDM project shall be established:<br />

• By project participants in accordance with provisions for the use of approved and new<br />

baseline methodologies (contained in decision 19/CP.9, the CDM A/R M&P and relevant<br />

decisions of the COP/MOP);<br />

• In a transparent and conservative manner regarding the choice of approaches, assumptions,<br />

methodologies, parameters, data sources, key factors and additionality, and taking into<br />

account uncertainty;<br />

• On a project-specific basis;<br />

• In the case of small scale A/R CDM project activities, in accordance with simplified<br />

modalities and procedures developed for such activities;<br />

• Taking into account relevant national and/or sectoral policies and circumstances, such as<br />

historical land uses, practices and economic trends.<br />

Carbon pools and baseline net GHG removals<br />

In calculating the baseline GHG removals and/or actual GHG removals, project participants<br />

may choose not to account for one or more carbon pools, and/or emissions of the GHGs<br />

measured in CO 2 equivalents, while avoiding double counting. This is subject to the provision<br />

of transparent and verifiable information that the choice will not increase the expected GHG<br />

removals. Project participants shall otherwise account for all significant changes in carbon<br />

pools and/or emissions of the GHGs measured in CO 2 equivalents by the sources that are<br />

increased as a result of the implementation of the A/R project activity, while avoiding double<br />

counting.<br />

Baseline approaches<br />

In choosing a baseline methodology for an A/R CDM project activity, project participants<br />

shall select from among the following approaches the one deemed most appropriate for the<br />

project activity, taking into account any guidance by the EB, and justify the appropriateness of<br />

their choice:<br />

• Existing or historical, as applicable, changes in carbon stocks in the carbon pools within the<br />

project boundary;<br />

• Changes in carbon stocks in the carbon pools within the project boundary from a land use<br />

that represents an economically attractive course of action, taking into account barriers to<br />

investment;<br />

• Changes in carbon stocks in the pools within the project boundary from the most likely<br />

land use at the time the project starts.<br />

Section C.6. Assessment and demonstration of additionality<br />

The concept of additionality in A/R CDM project activities is basically the same as that of the emission<br />

reduction CDM. The concept of additionality in A/R CDM is defined in A/R CDM M&P as follows:<br />

“The proposed A/R CDM project activity is additional if the actual net GHG removals by sinks are<br />

increased above the sum of the changes in carbon stocks in the carbon pools within the project<br />

boundary that would have occurred in the absence of the registered A/R CDM project activities.”<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!