Double-Edged Hydropolitics on the Nile - Center for Security Studies ...
Double-Edged Hydropolitics on the Nile - Center for Security Studies ...
Double-Edged Hydropolitics on the Nile - Center for Security Studies ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Double</str<strong>on</strong>g>-<str<strong>on</strong>g>Edged</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Hydropolitics</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nile</strong><br />
or <strong>the</strong> design of decisi<strong>on</strong> support systems <strong>for</strong> river basin management (Ito<br />
et al.; Salewicz and Nakayama 2004). The development and applicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
of methods to support multi-stakeholder decisi<strong>on</strong>-making (Sim<strong>on</strong>ovic<br />
and Fahmy 1999; Brown and Joubert 2003; Cai et al. 2004; Ghanbarpour<br />
et al. 2005) are not part of <strong>the</strong> analytical framework applied in this <strong>the</strong>sis,<br />
even though such approaches may obviously yield helpful tools <strong>for</strong> water<br />
professi<strong>on</strong>als in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nile</strong> countries to address <strong>the</strong> challenges of designing<br />
and implementing domestic and transboundary water development and<br />
management policies.<br />
1.4 C<strong>on</strong>ceptual framework<br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> introduces <strong>the</strong> two-level game approach as <strong>the</strong> overall c<strong>on</strong>ceptual<br />
framework applied to analyze <strong>the</strong> interacti<strong>on</strong>s between water<br />
policy processes at <strong>the</strong> domestic and transboundary levels. It fur<strong>the</strong>r specifies<br />
<strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cepts that were applied to frame <strong>the</strong> domestic policy-making<br />
processes.<br />
The noti<strong>on</strong> of ‘transboundary cooperati<strong>on</strong>’ is used <strong>for</strong> any advance al<strong>on</strong>g<br />
<strong>on</strong>e or several of <strong>the</strong> following tracks: 1) attributi<strong>on</strong> of riparian water utilizati<strong>on</strong><br />
rights and resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities, 2) establishment of joint river management<br />
instituti<strong>on</strong>s, 3) joint planning and implementati<strong>on</strong> of river development<br />
strategies and projects, and 4) any fur<strong>the</strong>r provisi<strong>on</strong>s, e.g., regarding data<br />
exchange, or research cooperati<strong>on</strong>. ‘Transboundary c<strong>on</strong>flicts’ are defined as<br />
situati<strong>on</strong>s where 1) at least two riparian states interact in an incompatible<br />
way, 2) at least <strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> involved parties aims <strong>for</strong> or ignores <strong>the</strong> negative<br />
impacts of <strong>the</strong> interacti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r party, and 3) at least <strong>on</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> involved<br />
parties experiences damage from <strong>the</strong> interacti<strong>on</strong> (see Mas<strong>on</strong> 2004). Elements<br />
of transboundary c<strong>on</strong>flict and cooperati<strong>on</strong> are thus not mutually exclusive<br />
and may co-exist. ‘Domestic water policies’ are defined as including not <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
<strong>the</strong> written planning documents, but also unwritten strategies pursued by<br />
<strong>the</strong> authorities, and particularly also <strong>the</strong> attenti<strong>on</strong> and priority given to <strong>the</strong><br />
planned re<strong>for</strong>ms and projects during implementati<strong>on</strong>. The ‘nati<strong>on</strong>al interest’<br />
44