09.01.2015 Views

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ON-EYE OPTICAL PERFORMANCE OF RIGID GAS PERMEABLE CONTACT LENSES<br />

9.2. INTRODUCTION<br />

In Chapter 8 we studied in vitro the optical implications of fitting contact lenses. In<br />

this Chapter we study the optical factors involved in the fitting of contact lenses on<br />

eye, in particular Monofocal Rigid Gas Permeable Contact Lenses, with an expected<br />

lower degree of conformity than the soft contact lens if the previous chapter. There are<br />

now sources of biological variability, for example movements of the lens on-eye, but<br />

the results can be directly applicable to real patients.<br />

It is well accepted in the contactology practice that RGP contact lenses produce<br />

superior visual quality than soft contact lenses, although to our knowledge this has not<br />

been experimentally demonstrated from an optical point of view. In this study we will<br />

address the potential of RGP lenses to reduce ocular aberrations (not only defocus <strong>and</strong><br />

astigmatism, but also high order aberrations). In this chapter we present measurements<br />

in four young healthy subjects, long term RGP CL wearers. Again, we will use the<br />

combination of total <strong>and</strong> anterior surface aberrations measurements, but now applied<br />

to these subjects with their natural optics <strong>and</strong> with their RGP lenses. The combination<br />

of these four types of measurements allows a complete description of the interactions<br />

of the CL with the subject's natural optics, <strong>and</strong> to study the optical implications of the<br />

RGP CL fitting.<br />

In this chapter we show: 1) The capability of RGP CLs to greatly reduce ocular<br />

aberrations beyond defocus, particularly in optically degraded eyes. 2) Flexure effects<br />

of the RGP CL's on anterior surface <strong>and</strong> total aberrations. 3) The contribution of the<br />

tear-lens to the ocular aberrations.<br />

9.3. METHODS<br />

9.3.1. Subjects<br />

Four volunteers (two males <strong>and</strong> two females) participated in the study. RGP CLs were<br />

not fit for this particular study, but rather the subjects were selected because they were<br />

long term <strong>and</strong> satisfied RGP CL wearers. Subjects wore their own CLs, which all were<br />

RGP with anterior spherical surfaces. Ages ranged from 18 to 33, <strong>and</strong> spherical<br />

refractions from –4.5 to –8 D. Individual autorefractometer refractions, ages, axial<br />

lengths, anterior chamber depths <strong>and</strong> corneal curvatures are reported in Table 9.1.<br />

Parameters of each CL provided by the manufacturers are also included Table 9.1.<br />

Apart from their ametropia, all eyes were normal, <strong>and</strong> BCVA was 1.00 or better. Only<br />

one eye was tested per subject, right eye for S1, S2 <strong>and</strong> S4, <strong>and</strong> left eye for S3. RGP<br />

lens stabilization <strong>and</strong> repositioning after blinking was checked by pupil video<br />

monitoring (with respect to the pupil center). While there was not inter-eye differences<br />

in the rest of the subjects, in subject S3 centration was significantly better for the left<br />

than for the right eye, <strong>and</strong> therefore the left eye was chosen for measurements. Table<br />

9.1 reports the coordinates of the center of the CL (in its stable position) relative to the<br />

pupil center.<br />

All subjects had an eye examination before participating in the experiment. All<br />

subjects were informed about the nature of the study <strong>and</strong> signed an informed consent<br />

form, following the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All the protocols <strong>and</strong> consent<br />

forms have been approved by Institutional Review Boards.<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!