09.01.2015 Views

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION<br />

changes in reflectivity <strong>and</strong> absorption, among other effects (Manns et al., 2002b,<br />

Fisher <strong>and</strong> Hahn, 2007).<br />

Pettit <strong>and</strong> Ediger reported a refractive index of the cornea, at 193 nm, of 1.52. For<br />

visible light, Barbero (Barbero, 2006) proposed a multilayer model of the human<br />

cornea (<strong>and</strong> tear) with refractive index between 1.40 <strong>and</strong> 1.33.<br />

1.6.6. Theoretical ablation profiles<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard algorithms for corneal refractive surgery are based on the Munnerlyn<br />

formula (Munnerlyn et al., 1988). The corneal tissue to be removed is a lenticule with<br />

an anterior radius of curvature equal to the pre-operative corneal radius <strong>and</strong> the<br />

posterior radius of curvature equal to the post-operative corneal radius (easily related<br />

to the attempted correction).<br />

The Munnerlyn equation can be expressed as:<br />

(1.8)<br />

Where R 1 is the initial radius of curvature, S is the optical power correction <strong>and</strong><br />

n= 1.377 is the average index of refraction of the cornea (with visible light) (see (Cano<br />

et al., 2004) for details).<br />

Sometimes the Munnerlyn equation is expressed by its parabolic approximation,<br />

which is obtained by truncating the Taylor expansion (Jiménez et al., 2003):<br />

(1.9)<br />

In this expression, the refractive index of the cornea has already been replaced by its<br />

numerical value, 1.377 (Schwiegerling et al., 2001, Munnerlyn et al., 1988). The<br />

parabolic approximation of the Munnerlyn formula (Eq. 1.9) states that the maximum<br />

depth of the ablation (in microns) per diopter of refractive change is equal to the<br />

square of the optical ablation zone (in millimeters), divided by three.<br />

Figure 1.15 shows ablation profiles based on the Munnerlyn’s equation (Eq. 1.8,<br />

black solid line) <strong>and</strong> its parabolic approximation (Eq. 1.9, red solid line of Fig. 1.15).<br />

Both profiles are similar in the central part of the profile, but different in the periphery.<br />

The optical effects of the different asphericity associated with both profiles will be<br />

described in Section 1.7.2.<br />

1.7. CORNEAL ABLATION AND OPTICAL ABERRATIONS<br />

1.7.1. Optical aberrations <strong>and</strong> visual performance after refractive surgery<br />

Although the degree of accuracy in the refractive correction achieved with PRK <strong>and</strong><br />

LASIK soon increased with the use of nomograms, some frequent complains include<br />

night vision problems: decreased vision, glare, halos or ghost images in mesopic <strong>and</strong><br />

scotopic vision. The low contrast VA <strong>and</strong> the CS was found to decrease (Verdon et al.,<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!