Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...
Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...
Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION<br />
changes in reflectivity <strong>and</strong> absorption, among other effects (Manns et al., 2002b,<br />
Fisher <strong>and</strong> Hahn, 2007).<br />
Pettit <strong>and</strong> Ediger reported a refractive index of the cornea, at 193 nm, of 1.52. For<br />
visible light, Barbero (Barbero, 2006) proposed a multilayer model of the human<br />
cornea (<strong>and</strong> tear) with refractive index between 1.40 <strong>and</strong> 1.33.<br />
1.6.6. Theoretical ablation profiles<br />
St<strong>and</strong>ard algorithms for corneal refractive surgery are based on the Munnerlyn<br />
formula (Munnerlyn et al., 1988). The corneal tissue to be removed is a lenticule with<br />
an anterior radius of curvature equal to the pre-operative corneal radius <strong>and</strong> the<br />
posterior radius of curvature equal to the post-operative corneal radius (easily related<br />
to the attempted correction).<br />
The Munnerlyn equation can be expressed as:<br />
(1.8)<br />
Where R 1 is the initial radius of curvature, S is the optical power correction <strong>and</strong><br />
n= 1.377 is the average index of refraction of the cornea (with visible light) (see (Cano<br />
et al., 2004) for details).<br />
Sometimes the Munnerlyn equation is expressed by its parabolic approximation,<br />
which is obtained by truncating the Taylor expansion (Jiménez et al., 2003):<br />
(1.9)<br />
In this expression, the refractive index of the cornea has already been replaced by its<br />
numerical value, 1.377 (Schwiegerling et al., 2001, Munnerlyn et al., 1988). The<br />
parabolic approximation of the Munnerlyn formula (Eq. 1.9) states that the maximum<br />
depth of the ablation (in microns) per diopter of refractive change is equal to the<br />
square of the optical ablation zone (in millimeters), divided by three.<br />
Figure 1.15 shows ablation profiles based on the Munnerlyn’s equation (Eq. 1.8,<br />
black solid line) <strong>and</strong> its parabolic approximation (Eq. 1.9, red solid line of Fig. 1.15).<br />
Both profiles are similar in the central part of the profile, but different in the periphery.<br />
The optical effects of the different asphericity associated with both profiles will be<br />
described in Section 1.7.2.<br />
1.7. CORNEAL ABLATION AND OPTICAL ABERRATIONS<br />
1.7.1. Optical aberrations <strong>and</strong> visual performance after refractive surgery<br />
Although the degree of accuracy in the refractive correction achieved with PRK <strong>and</strong><br />
LASIK soon increased with the use of nomograms, some frequent complains include<br />
night vision problems: decreased vision, glare, halos or ghost images in mesopic <strong>and</strong><br />
scotopic vision. The low contrast VA <strong>and</strong> the CS was found to decrease (Verdon et al.,<br />
43