Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...
Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...
Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CHAPTER 1<br />
1.9.5. Multifocal contact lenses<br />
Presbyopic contact lens correction is still a challenge for both patients <strong>and</strong><br />
practitioners. Despite the number of potential patients as the population gets older, the<br />
use of multifocal contact lenses accounts for only a small proportion of contact lens<br />
wearers (Section 1.9.6). As a result, a number of different fitting strategies <strong>and</strong> designs<br />
continue to be developed for the presbyopic subject. Most of the more successful<br />
current types are concentric <strong>and</strong> based on the principle of simultaneous vision. Soft<br />
lenses are frequently the only choice, as the larger total diameter enables the<br />
practitioner to achieve better control of centration <strong>and</strong> lens movement. Figure 1.22<br />
shows some examples of simultanoeus vision multifocal designs. In this thesis only<br />
lenses with progressive transitions are considered, to avoid problems in the<br />
topographic <strong>and</strong> aberration measurements.<br />
Fig. 1.22. Some examples of multifocal designs by simultaneous vision. The far <strong>and</strong><br />
near zones (different tones of blue) are arranged at different radial distances.<br />
As already mentioned in Section 1.5.2.5, the adaptation to the new visual experience<br />
these lenses provide is often difficult. Moreover, no adjustments are possible with<br />
hydrophilic lenses <strong>and</strong> the fitting procedure in quite inefficient, as it is based on trial<br />
<strong>and</strong> error with different lenses.<br />
Depth of focus <strong>and</strong> tolerance to blur, pupil diameter <strong>and</strong> optical aberrations of the<br />
eye are additional issues in underst<strong>and</strong>ing the fitting of multifocal contact lenses, to be<br />
considered in combination with other fitting effects already mentioned affecting<br />
monofocal contact lenses.<br />
1.9.6. Prescribing trends<br />
Contact lenses are a popular way to correct refractive errors of eyes. Contact lens<br />
wearers are a significant proportion of the population in western countries, <strong>and</strong> their<br />
use is increasing: about 3 in 10 contact lens fits around the world are prescribed as<br />
“new fits” (Morgan et al., 2009). Soft lenses account for 90 percent of fits worldwide.<br />
The use of rigid lenses is declining (14 per cent of all fits in 2002 to 9 per cent in<br />
2008), but the proportion of ortho-K lenses has risen from 0 to 11 per cent of rigid<br />
fittings. Multifocal <strong>and</strong> monovision lenses represent 5 per cent of the rigid fittings,<br />
<strong>and</strong> 7 per cent of the soft fittings (1% <strong>and</strong> 15 % respectively, in Spain).<br />
1.10. FITTING CONTACT LENSES AND OPTICAL ABERRATIONS<br />
Wavefront aberrometry offers exciting new opportunities to advance our<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the ways in which contact lenses interact with both the normal <strong>and</strong><br />
abnormal eye, <strong>and</strong> will likely become a common tool in the contactology practice.<br />
This in turn should allow significant improvements in the optical design of lenses <strong>and</strong><br />
in our ability to select lens designs which produce the optimal overall visual<br />
performance for the individual eye (Charman, 2005).<br />
54