09.01.2015 Views

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

Low_resolution_Thesis_CDD_221009_public - Visual Optics and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CONCLUSIONS<br />

5We have developed a procedure to experimentally measure the laser efficiency<br />

effects on curved surfaces (laser efficiency losses from the center to the<br />

periphery of the ablated surface) <strong>and</strong> also to estimate the effect in cornea. We<br />

found important differences across laser platforms, depending on their fluence (6.5%<br />

for 120 mJ/cm 2 at 2.5 mm from the corneal apex <strong>and</strong> almost negligible for 400<br />

mJ/cm 2 ). We obtained correction factors for these effects, to be applied in the clinical<br />

units.<br />

6A hybrid porcine plastic model for the calibration of anterior segment imaging<br />

systems was developed. This artificial eye shows corneal properties (scattering,<br />

refractive index) comparable to those of living eyes, but without biological<br />

variability. The model was used to validate a Pentacam Sheimpflug imaging system,<br />

nominally corrected of geometrical <strong>and</strong> optical distortion. We proved that this<br />

instrument can reliably measure potential changes in the posterior corneal surface after<br />

refractive surgery.<br />

7We found that myopic LASIK refractive surgery (from -1.25 to -8.5 D) did not<br />

induce systematic long-term changes in the posterior corneal surface shape.<br />

Differences were only significant one-day after surgery, <strong>and</strong> the changes were<br />

more relevant in the vertical than in the horizontal meridian. The amount of individual<br />

changes in the posterior cornea (radius of curvature) in post-LASIK patients is similar<br />

to that found in normal eyes. Left <strong>and</strong> right eyes show similar changes, suggesting<br />

physiological mechanisms acting bilaterally in the same way.<br />

8We developed another in-vitro model based on artificial plastic eyes, aimed at<br />

studying the fitting of soft contact lenses. The model allowed eliminating the<br />

biological variability associated with real eyes (movements <strong>and</strong> decentrations of<br />

the lens, ocular aberrations) while simulating a more realistic situation than a st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

inmersion measurement. Using this in vitro model we found that soft monofocal<br />

spherical lenses reduce total spherical aberration. Multifocal lenses are affected by<br />

conformity to the cornea <strong>and</strong> fitting effects that cancel out the multifocal properties of<br />

the design, although the final optical performance depends on the lens power that<br />

determines the central thickness.<br />

9We used aberration measurements on real eyes fitted with semirigid (RGP)<br />

contact lenses <strong>and</strong> found this tool useful to underst<strong>and</strong> the fitting process <strong>and</strong> the<br />

optical coupling between the optics of the lens <strong>and</strong> the optics of the eye. We<br />

demonstrated that RGP contact lenses can significantly improve the natural optics of<br />

the eye. The internal optics <strong>and</strong> the lens flexure can impose limits on this<br />

compensation. We found a marked correlation between the corneal <strong>and</strong> ocular<br />

aberrations of the same eye measured with <strong>and</strong> without semirigid (RGP) contact<br />

lenses. We were able to measure the aberrations of the tear lens in RGP contact lenses,<br />

<strong>and</strong> reported a compensatory effect on the total spherical aberration. This<br />

methodology provides an accurate analysis of CL fitting in individual eyes, <strong>and</strong> can<br />

help to choose the best lens parameters to improve the optics of individual eyes.<br />

258

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!