13.01.2015 Views

Download sector_report1.pdf - Microfinance and Development ...

Download sector_report1.pdf - Microfinance and Development ...

Download sector_report1.pdf - Microfinance and Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Overview <strong>and</strong> Summary<br />

of Main Recommendations<br />

<strong>and</strong> microsavings). The absence so far of savings has unfortunately been one of the distinguishing<br />

features of Indian microfinance, <strong>and</strong> prevents it from providing a financial service to the poor which is<br />

as valuable to them as microcredit.<br />

A third financial service, microinsurance, is increasingly being offered by MFIs acting as agents of the<br />

insurance companies. Life insurance is quite common now among MFI members, with a smaller proportion<br />

availing of asset insurance, mainly of loan financed assets. Insurance is less widespread under the SHG<br />

model. The form of insurance of greatest relevance to poverty alleviation is health insurance, which a<br />

growing number of MFIs along with other civil society organizations such as charitable hospitals are<br />

beginning to offer. Efforts are also getting under way to introduce the form of asset insurance of<br />

greatest interest to the poor, crop or weather insurance.<br />

Continuing <strong>and</strong> new challenges<br />

These are all welcome developments. But as with any complex <strong>and</strong> rapidly evolving <strong>sector</strong> of activity,<br />

microfinance in India, especially the MFI model, continues to face persisting challenges, <strong>and</strong> at least<br />

one major new threat.<br />

Creating an awareness of the need to charge cost-recovering<br />

interest rates<br />

Perhaps the most important of the continuing challenges facing the MFI model is the need to create<br />

much greater awareness of the need for MFIs to charge cost recovering interest rates if they are to<br />

survive <strong>and</strong> grow. Clearly, the level of interest rates, especially for the poor, is a relevant public concern.<br />

However interest rate ceilings are not the best way to control them. 7 Very few even otherwise well<br />

informed persons realize that MFIs deliver <strong>and</strong> collect unsecured small loans virtually at the doorstep,<br />

<strong>and</strong> collect them once a week, 50 times a year. In India, in addition, they do not benefit from lower cost<br />

funds collected as savings, as a result of which their financial cost ratio (cost of funds as a ratio of<br />

portfolio outst<strong>and</strong>ing) is amongst the highest in the world (Chapter 3). Despite this, their interest rates<br />

are amongst the lowest in the world, because of high repayment rates <strong>and</strong> high productivity of<br />

field staff. 8<br />

For small start-up MFIs, unit transactions costs are particularly high. Again, very few persons outside<br />

the <strong>sector</strong> recognize that any transactions costs quidelines that may be laid down will have to recognize<br />

<strong>and</strong> provide for this. Third, if there is one clear lesson from the AP crisis (discussed in Chapter 4), it is<br />

that attempts to achieve 100 percent recovery rates (or "zero tolerance" for default) is a recipe for<br />

excesses in collection practices in the long run, leading to adverse publicity, <strong>and</strong> loss of borrower<br />

support <strong>and</strong> public confidence. Only documented experience with policies of conscious acceptance of<br />

higher loan loss rates will indicate where the optimal trade-off lies between maintaining financial<br />

viability on the one h<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> public support on the other, but many persons would guess it lies<br />

between 2 <strong>and</strong> 3 percent. This component, the risk premium, adds further to the cost-recovering<br />

interest rate (although much less than the cost of funds <strong>and</strong> transactions costs).<br />

This is a time<br />

more than any<br />

other, with the<br />

need to rebuild<br />

the public<br />

image of the<br />

<strong>sector</strong>, when<br />

MFIs need to be<br />

experimenting<br />

with new<br />

products <strong>and</strong><br />

repayment<br />

schedules that<br />

pay greater<br />

heed to client<br />

cash flow<br />

compulsions,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to client<br />

perspectives<br />

generally, as<br />

opposed to a<br />

single-minded<br />

preoccupation<br />

with their own<br />

need to<br />

minimize costs<br />

This is a time more than any other, with the need to rebuild the public image of the <strong>sector</strong>, when MFIs<br />

need to be experimenting with new products <strong>and</strong> repayment schedules that pay greater heed to client<br />

cash flow compulsions, <strong>and</strong> to client perspectives generally, as opposed to a single-minded preoccupation<br />

with their own need to minimize costs. As has often been pointed out, there have been no major<br />

innovations in credit delivery systems since the original break-through came in the form of group<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!