Download sector_report1.pdf - Microfinance and Development ...
Download sector_report1.pdf - Microfinance and Development ...
Download sector_report1.pdf - Microfinance and Development ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Microinsurance<br />
Box 5.3 Continued<br />
• MFIs do not have to be wedded to one insurance partner forever. If the insurer is not<br />
performing, the MFI can get a new partner. Yet if an MFI changes insurance partners too<br />
frequently, it can cause confusion among clients <strong>and</strong> staff.<br />
• The alternative to changing partners is to get existing partners to improve. SHEPHERD has<br />
adopted this approach by inviting insurers to the field so they better underst<strong>and</strong> the<br />
target market <strong>and</strong> begin to recognize the difference between insurance <strong>and</strong> microinsurance.<br />
• To get good products <strong>and</strong> processes from insurers at a decent price, MFIs need to know<br />
what they want <strong>and</strong> they have to take the driver's seat in the negotiations. The larger they<br />
are, the more dem<strong>and</strong>ing they can be.<br />
• An efficient claims processing system is one of the most important points for negotiation.<br />
MFIs should insist that they pay the claims, <strong>and</strong> then be reimbursed from the insurer,<br />
based on documentation that is appropriate for their clients.<br />
• A review committee, with representatives from the MFI, insurer <strong>and</strong> clients, could be a way<br />
of improving claims processes.<br />
• MFIs should also persuade insurers to drop as many exclusions as possible, even if they<br />
have to pay a higher price.<br />
Lessons: Product Design<br />
• Efficiency depends less on the delivery model than on the simplicity of the product or<br />
product menu.<br />
• Simple products work best because they are easier to administer <strong>and</strong> easier for clients to<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>. Adding riders is fraught with difficulties. Even small riders may have<br />
large consequences.<br />
• The link between insurance <strong>and</strong> a loan can improve efficiencies, but it also has significant<br />
limitations. Of the three, only SHEPHERD has concluded that insurance should not be<br />
linked to microcredit since risks can happen when people do not have a loan.<br />
• The target market is heterogeneous, so it is wise to offer a couple of different product<br />
options as long as they do not overly complicate the marketing message.<br />
• MFIs should only include benefits that clients can claim without difficulty.<br />
• If MFIs sell microinsurance to non-members, the organizations (or their insurance partners)<br />
are vulnerable to adverse selection risks. To control this risk, insurance should only be<br />
offered to persons who have joined a group for purposes other than accessing insurance.<br />
• Without actuarial calculations, premiums are likely to be set too high–which means that<br />
clients are getting poor value for money–or too low, which can place the entire scheme<br />
in jeopardy.<br />
• MFIs need to conduct a costing analysis to determine how much they need to earn in<br />
commission to cover their administrative expenses.<br />
• MFIs cannot afford to lose money on an in-house insurance scheme, so they have to price<br />
conservatively <strong>and</strong> hence overcharge their customers.<br />
Excerpted from Roth et al 2005<br />
85