Table 3.3 Financial performance of MFIs classified by client outreach <strong>and</strong> loan portfolio Categories No. of MFIs OSS MFIs categorised by credit client outreach Small (50,000) Aggregate 44 23 7 74 MFIs categorised by loan portfolio Small (< 5 crore) Medium (5-20 crore) Large (>20 crore) Aggregate Sa-dhan recommended st<strong>and</strong>ards 53 14 7 74 Sustainability 73.6 84.2 123.3 110.3 66.6 90 125.8 110.3 100% Asset Quality Source: Tables 13 <strong>and</strong> 14 of Side-by-Side (Sa-Dhan 2005). PAR CRR OCR TCR 4.3 4.2 1.5 2.2 3.6 4.9 1.3 2.2 < 10% 92.2 93.8 99.3 97.7 93.3 94.3 99.2 97.7 >90% 15.0 20.4 14.2 15.4 12.4 25.9 13.0 15.4
Table 3.4 Comparative performance indicators for MFIs in India, South Asia, <strong>and</strong> other regions of the world 53 Indicators Scale <strong>and</strong> Outreach Number of Active Borrowers Gross Loan Portfolio Percent of Women Borrowers Average Balance per Borrower Average Balance per Borrower/ GNI per capita Number of Savers Voluntary Savings Average Savings Balance per Saver Average Savings Balance per Saver/ GNI per capita Financial Structure Capital / Asset Ratio Debt / Equity Ratio Deposits to Loans Deposits to Assets Gross Loan Portfolio / Assets Profitability <strong>and</strong> Sustainability Return on Assets Return on Equity Operational Self-Sufficiency Revenue Financial Revenue Ratio Profit Margin Expense Total Expense Ratio Financial Expense Ratio Loan Loss Provision Expense Ratio Operating Expense Ratio Efficiency Operating Expense / Loan Portfolio Cost per Borrower (USD) Productivity Borrowers per Staff Member Savers per Staff Member Portfolio Quality PAR>30 Ratio Loan Loss Reserve Ratio Risk Coverage Ratio Write Off Ratio Africa 14,968 3,960,419 62.1% 509 113.4% 40,140 3,995,671 127 43.8% 37.3% 4.2 122.0% 31.2% 64.2% -5.7% -37.6% 97.7% 25.2% -37.3% 30.7% 2.8% 2.2% 25.7% 60.6% 232 149 206 7.9% 6.9% 139.5% 3.5% EAP 97,905 48,220,723 76.5% 291 38.6% 814,176 86,210,649 164 34.3% 37.6% 3.0 37.6% 24.7% 70.5% 0.9% 5.9% 117.5% 28.6% 1.9% 27.2% 5.0% 1.2% 21.0% 32.1% 58 139 179 5.6% 3.7% 5660.8% 2.5% ECA 6,162 10,395,162 53.4% 1,902 187.0% 9,980 9,061,083 1,328 78.3% 60.0% 2.9 20.5% 11.8% 78.1% 5.3% 14.6% 128.9% 30.4% 6.2% 24.3% 2.4% 1.1% 20.7% 28.4% 326 72 27 2.1% 2.0% 413.4% 1.2% LAC 24,162 19,829,124 58.0% 788 53.3% 12,826 14,049,333 2,424 140.0% 32.8% 5.8 26.2% 19.7% 79.9% 2.9% 8.1% 115.8% 31.2% 8.4% 27.6% 6.3% 2.2% 19.1% 26.5% 155 139 95 4.8% 5.0% 255.5% 1.8% MENA 19,165 5,360,530 65.6% 512 28.3% 225 - n/a n/a 71.5% 1.1 0.0% 0.0% 69.5% 3.6% 5.0% 117.2% 22.7% -13.6% 19.0% 1.0% -0.1% 18.2% 35.1% 130 120 - 2.9% 3.4% 155.8% 2.2% Source: Copyright <strong>Microfinance</strong> Information eXchange, Inc. Performance Indicators by Region <strong>and</strong> Country. First published in: Performance <strong>and</strong> Transparency. A survey of microfinance in South Asia. Edited by Hind Tazi. <strong>Microfinance</strong> Information eXchange, Inc., Washington, DC. January 2006. p. 93. Reprinted with permission. S. Asia 107,875 9,467,381 83.3% 113 22.2% 32,791 2,962,383 64 13.7% 21.3% 29.8 14.0% 7.1% 73.6% -2.3% -6.6% 105.5% 18.5% -19.6% 20.7% 5.1% 1.2% 14.4% 22.0% 25 219 81 7.6% 4.2% 315.5% 0.5% Afghanistan 15,489 1,543,763 67.0% 216 26.9% - - n/a n/a 41.1% 3.0 0.0% 0.0% 66.1% -66.7% -226.8% 33.2% 21.2% -319.2% 87.9% 4.2% 2.0% 81.7% 126.7% 152 54 - 0.4% 2.6% 585.4% 0.1% Bangladesh 221,099 15,872,904 94.0% 66 15.3% 56,685 5,682,724 15 3.7% 23.5% (1.5) 3.0% 2.2% 75.8% 3.6% 17.2% 125.7% 19.8% 15.3% 16.1% 3.4% 0.8% 11.9% 15.8% 10 131 12 5.8% 3.9% 277.5% 0.3% India 44,031 5,647,202 90.4% 134 21.6% 4,056 236,530 121 19.6% 10.6% 122.8 8.4% 7.1% 83.0% -1.5% -10.2% 98.5% 20.7% -7.8% 22.0% 8.5% 1.3% 12.3% 15.5% 14 439 115 4.4% 1.6% 482.6% 0.5% Nepal 19,766 2,148,174 90.5% 131 50.4% 22,784 607,200 47 18.1% 9.2% 12.3 37.4% 21.3% 52.3% 1.0% 12.1% 110.0% 13.3% 7.9% 12.0% 5.1% 1.2% 5.7% 11.5% 14 152 186 6.2% 4.7% 89.5% 0.5% Pakistan 24,179 3,490,386 47.8% 175 33.1% 5,084 303,747 146 31.0% 32.9% (19.7) 24.6% 1.7% 65.2% -8.2% -32.3% 73.6% 13.2% -90.7% 21.4% 4.3% 2.3% 14.8% 34.6% 67 171 28 20.5% 9.6% 180.6% 1.0% Sri Lanka 43,347 7,370,274 65.8% 124 12.8% 106,168 5,682,913 33 3.4% 28.1% 4.2 61.7% 34.4% 67.5% -0.1% 3.5% 101.3% 15.5% -15.8% 15.1% 4.3% 0.5% 10.4% 19.3% 16 175 369 11.1% 5.4% 116.3% 0.4% Progress Under the MFI Model
- Page 3: Microfinance in India A State of th
- Page 6 and 7: List of Tables Page No Table 2.1 Gr
- Page 8 and 9: Preface and Acknowledgements This r
- Page 10 and 11: Abbreviations ABC ADB BC BF CAR CAG
- Page 13 and 14: CHAPTER 1 Overview and Summary of M
- Page 15 and 16: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 17 and 18: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 19 and 20: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 21 and 22: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 23 and 24: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 25 and 26: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 27: Overview and Summary of Main Recomm
- Page 30 and 31: 1 1a 1b 2 2a 2b 2c 3 3a 3b 3c 4 4a
- Page 32 and 33: The Light and Shades Study A major
- Page 34 and 35: highest proportion of weak records
- Page 36 and 37: their profitability after accountin
- Page 38 and 39: allow the programme to grow organic
- Page 40 and 41: 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8
- Page 42 and 43: Endnotes 1 It is very hard to compa
- Page 44 and 45: as cash with the groups, the true r
- Page 46 and 47: linkages", 11 percent 3rd, and 5 pe
- Page 48 and 49: References APMAS (AP Mahila Abhivru
- Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER 3 Progress Under the MFI Mo
- Page 53: Progress Under the MFI Model is fun
- Page 57 and 58: Progress Under the MFI Model on lit
- Page 59 and 60: Progress Under the MFI Model 4 Howe
- Page 61: Progress Under the MFI Model Refere
- Page 64 and 65: MFIs, and the need for MFIs to plou
- Page 66 and 67: size had actually come down during
- Page 68 and 69: The point at which peer group press
- Page 70 and 71: The lack of contact and communicati
- Page 72 and 73: Box 4.1 Continued 4. MFIs will coll
- Page 74 and 75: Endnotes 1 There will be many disag
- Page 76 and 77: 19 The base suicide rate in AP is 1
- Page 78 and 79: References APMAS, 2005, "A Report o
- Page 80 and 81: (such as cattle and houses), and co
- Page 82 and 83: The advantage of the provider model
- Page 84 and 85: Some lessons learnt from experience
- Page 86 and 87: Box 5.2 VimoSEWA: Synergies between
- Page 88 and 89: 86 Table 5.1 Main Feature of Health
- Page 90 and 91: Endnotes 1 While the microinsurance
- Page 92 and 93: 16 A little less than a fifth of th
- Page 94 and 95: 29 The rationale for transfer progr
- Page 96 and 97: Roth, James and Vijay Athreye, 2005
- Page 98 and 99: Issues and priorities for action re
- Page 100 and 101: Endnotes 1 See for instance CGAP (2
- Page 102 and 103: 100
- Page 104 and 105:
such as Chaitanya who soon became s
- Page 106 and 107:
money to support operational expens
- Page 108 and 109:
finance, and the microfinancial ski
- Page 110 and 111:
Box 6.1 Continued in experts and to
- Page 112 and 113:
Endnotes 1 In a sense it always was
- Page 114 and 115:
16 Examples are Margdarshak in Luck
- Page 116 and 117:
114
- Page 118 and 119:
Table 7:1 Commercial bank exposure
- Page 120 and 121:
The main constraints to the expansi
- Page 122 and 123:
further review, RBI has modified th
- Page 124 and 125:
9 Thus ICICI has sold some of its b
- Page 126 and 127:
B. Equity Investments by the Ventur
- Page 128 and 129:
Figure : The Bellwether triangle Lo
- Page 130 and 131:
Despite the weaknesses the public s
- Page 132 and 133:
Box 7.1 Continued foreign sources o
- Page 134 and 135:
Endnotes 1 At this point they will
- Page 136 and 137:
References ACCION, 2003, "The Servi
- Page 138 and 139:
SIDBI Foundation for Micro Credit (
- Page 140 and 141:
categories, depending on the amount
- Page 142 and 143:
The distribution of total disbursem
- Page 144 and 145:
Endnotes 1 It should be noted that
- Page 146 and 147:
B. Donor Participation in Indian Mi
- Page 148 and 149:
this has dropped to 8% on the curre
- Page 150 and 151:
and poor populations. More directly
- Page 152 and 153:
and expansion of available retailer
- Page 154 and 155:
11 SDC through various programs for
- Page 156 and 157:
154
- Page 158 and 159:
1.1 Impact evaluation of Spandana's
- Page 160 and 161:
in the loan tenure of 24 months. Th
- Page 162 and 163:
There are two main motivations of a
- Page 164 and 165:
compensation structures used by Ind
- Page 166 and 167:
Endnotes 1 By Annie Duflo, Anvesha
- Page 168 and 169:
29 The main components of direct tr
- Page 170:
168