13.01.2015 Views

The Role of Sustainable Land Management for Climate ... - CAADP

The Role of Sustainable Land Management for Climate ... - CAADP

The Role of Sustainable Land Management for Climate ... - CAADP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

!<br />

or in some cases, can make the problems worse. Top-down promotion <strong>of</strong> “one-size-fits-all”<br />

approaches to land management or climate mitigation activities in contexts where these are not<br />

suited, can result in increased land degradation and opposition by local people. An example <strong>of</strong><br />

this problem occurred in the Ethiopian highlands during the <strong>for</strong>mer Marxist Derg regime, when<br />

farmers were <strong>for</strong>ced to construct terraces, even though this reduced crop production in some<br />

places because <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> land on steep slopes, increased waterlogging, pests, and other problems.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> these problems, farmers sometimes did not adequately maintain the terraces,<br />

contributing to problems <strong>of</strong> gully <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

It is important that ef<strong>for</strong>ts to promote SLM <strong>for</strong> climate mitigation and adaptation be<br />

adequately in<strong>for</strong>med about the potential and actual impacts <strong>of</strong> interventions in different contexts.<br />

Applied research, technology development and knowledge generation and dissemination about<br />

“what works where when and why” in land management can help ensure that these ef<strong>for</strong>ts are as<br />

effective and pro-poor in their impacts as possible. This research and knowledge dissemination<br />

can and should draw upon a considerable base <strong>of</strong> indigenous knowledge on these issues, as well<br />

as upon scientific research and rigorous evaluations <strong>of</strong> program interventions.<br />

4.3.5. Improve coordination <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts to address climate and land degradation, and<br />

integration with key government strategies and processes<br />

Substantial ef<strong>for</strong>ts are taking place to coordinate programs addressing climate change within the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the UNFCCC, while programs to address land degradation in Africa are being<br />

coordinated by the UNCCD, NEPAD and TerrAfrica. However, coordination between these<br />

focal areas can still be improved, although significant steps have begun in this direction. <strong>The</strong><br />

processes <strong>of</strong> developing and implementing strategies and plans related to these areas are largely<br />

separate. For example, it is not clear how and to what extent many <strong>of</strong> the NAPAs developed<br />

under the UNFCCC build upon or are linked to the NAPs developed under the UNCCD.<br />

Involvement <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders from the SLM community in the current UNFCCC processes is<br />

very useful in addressing this need. It would also be useful to increase the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />

stakeholders from the climate change community in the processes to develop SLM strategies and<br />

plans, such as the development <strong>of</strong> CSIFs.<br />

Even more important is effective integration <strong>of</strong> strategies and plans related to both<br />

climate change and SLM with the overarching strategies and policy processes in African<br />

!<br />

*$!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!