The Role of Sustainable Land Management for Climate ... - CAADP
The Role of Sustainable Land Management for Climate ... - CAADP
The Role of Sustainable Land Management for Climate ... - CAADP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
!<br />
or in some cases, can make the problems worse. Top-down promotion <strong>of</strong> “one-size-fits-all”<br />
approaches to land management or climate mitigation activities in contexts where these are not<br />
suited, can result in increased land degradation and opposition by local people. An example <strong>of</strong><br />
this problem occurred in the Ethiopian highlands during the <strong>for</strong>mer Marxist Derg regime, when<br />
farmers were <strong>for</strong>ced to construct terraces, even though this reduced crop production in some<br />
places because <strong>of</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> land on steep slopes, increased waterlogging, pests, and other problems.<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> these problems, farmers sometimes did not adequately maintain the terraces,<br />
contributing to problems <strong>of</strong> gully <strong>for</strong>mation.<br />
It is important that ef<strong>for</strong>ts to promote SLM <strong>for</strong> climate mitigation and adaptation be<br />
adequately in<strong>for</strong>med about the potential and actual impacts <strong>of</strong> interventions in different contexts.<br />
Applied research, technology development and knowledge generation and dissemination about<br />
“what works where when and why” in land management can help ensure that these ef<strong>for</strong>ts are as<br />
effective and pro-poor in their impacts as possible. This research and knowledge dissemination<br />
can and should draw upon a considerable base <strong>of</strong> indigenous knowledge on these issues, as well<br />
as upon scientific research and rigorous evaluations <strong>of</strong> program interventions.<br />
4.3.5. Improve coordination <strong>of</strong> ef<strong>for</strong>ts to address climate and land degradation, and<br />
integration with key government strategies and processes<br />
Substantial ef<strong>for</strong>ts are taking place to coordinate programs addressing climate change within the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the UNFCCC, while programs to address land degradation in Africa are being<br />
coordinated by the UNCCD, NEPAD and TerrAfrica. However, coordination between these<br />
focal areas can still be improved, although significant steps have begun in this direction. <strong>The</strong><br />
processes <strong>of</strong> developing and implementing strategies and plans related to these areas are largely<br />
separate. For example, it is not clear how and to what extent many <strong>of</strong> the NAPAs developed<br />
under the UNFCCC build upon or are linked to the NAPs developed under the UNCCD.<br />
Involvement <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders from the SLM community in the current UNFCCC processes is<br />
very useful in addressing this need. It would also be useful to increase the involvement <strong>of</strong><br />
stakeholders from the climate change community in the processes to develop SLM strategies and<br />
plans, such as the development <strong>of</strong> CSIFs.<br />
Even more important is effective integration <strong>of</strong> strategies and plans related to both<br />
climate change and SLM with the overarching strategies and policy processes in African<br />
!<br />
*$!