19.01.2015 Views

Delivering continuity of midwifery care to Queensland women

Delivering continuity of midwifery care to Queensland women

Delivering continuity of midwifery care to Queensland women

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

94<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Ageing. (2009). Report <strong>of</strong> the Maternity Services Review February<br />

2009. ISBN: 1-74186-833-5. Online ISBN: 1-74186-834-3 Retrieved from<br />

www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/msr-report<br />

Fereday, J., Collins, C., Turnbull, D., Pincombe, J. & Oster, C. (2009). An evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Midwifery Group Practice: Part II: Women’s satisfaction. [doi: 10.1016/j.<br />

wombi.2008.08.001]. Women and Birth. 22(1), 11-16.<br />

Fereday, J. & Oster, C. (2010). Managing a work–life balance: the experiences <strong>of</strong> midwives<br />

working in a group practice setting. [doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2008.06.004]. Midwifery.<br />

26(3), 311-318.<br />

Flint, C. (1993). Midwifery teams and caseloads. Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.<br />

Forster, P. (2005). <strong>Queensland</strong> Health’s Systems Review: Final Report. Government Printer<br />

Brisbane Retrieved from www.health.qld.gov.au/health_sys_review/final/qhsr_final_<br />

report.pdf<br />

Freeman, L. M., Adair, V., Timperley, H. & West, S. H. (2006). The influence <strong>of</strong> the birthplace<br />

and models <strong>of</strong> <strong>care</strong> on <strong>midwifery</strong> practice for the management <strong>of</strong> <strong>women</strong> in labour.<br />

[doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.10.001]. Women and Birth. 19(4), 97-105.<br />

Gottvall, K., Waldenström, U., Tingstig, C. & Grunewald, C. (2011). In-Hospital Birth Center<br />

with the Same Medical Guidelines as Standard Care: A Comparative Study <strong>of</strong> Obstetric<br />

Interventions and Outcomes. Birth. 38(2), 120-128.<br />

Guilliland, K. & Pairman, S. (1995). The <strong>midwifery</strong> partnership a model for practice: 95/1<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Nursing and Midwifery, Vic<strong>to</strong>ria University <strong>of</strong> Welling<strong>to</strong>n, Welling<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

Guilliland, K., Tracy, S. & Thorogood, C. (2010 ). Australian and New Zealand health<strong>care</strong> and<br />

maternity services In S. Pairman, S. Tracy, C. Thorogood & J. Pincombe. (Eds.), Midwifery<br />

preparation for practice. 2nd Edition (pp. 12-16). Sydney: Elsevier.<br />

Hatem, M., Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H. & Gates, S. (2008). Midwife-led versus other<br />

models <strong>of</strong> <strong>care</strong> for childbearing <strong>women</strong>. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Systematic Reviews.<br />

2008, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD004667. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004667.pub2 Retrieved<br />

from www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab004667.html<br />

Hendrix, M., Evers, S., Basten, M., Nijhuis, J. & Severens, J. (2009). Cost Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Dutch<br />

Obstetric System: low-risk nulliparous <strong>women</strong> preferring home or short-stay hospital<br />

birth – a prospective non-randomised controlled study. BMC Health Services Research<br />

9(211), Open Access. Retrieved from www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/211/.<br />

doi:doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-211<br />

Hendry, S. (2008). Understanding your context: preparing for change In C. Homer, P. Brodie &<br />

N. Leap (Eds.), Midwifery Continuity <strong>of</strong> Care. Sydney: Elsevier.<br />

Hirst, C. (2005). Rebirthing. Report <strong>of</strong> the review <strong>of</strong> maternity services in <strong>Queensland</strong>.<br />

Brisbane: <strong>Queensland</strong> Government Retrieved from www.health.qld.gov.au/<br />

publications/corporate/maternity_report2005/MaternityReview_FullDoc.pdf<br />

Hodnett, E. D., Downe, S., Walsh, D. & Wes<strong>to</strong>n, J. (2010). Alternative versus conventional<br />

institutional settings for birth. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Systematic Reviews. 2010, Issue 9.<br />

Art. No.: CD000012. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000012.pub3. Retrieved from<br />

www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/ab000012.html<br />

Homer, C. (2006). Challenging <strong>midwifery</strong> <strong>care</strong>, challenging midwives and challenging the<br />

system. [doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.07.002]. Women and Birth. 19(3), 79-83.<br />

Homer, C., Brodie, P. & Leap, N. (2008). Midwifery Continuity <strong>of</strong> Care. Sydney: Elsevier.<br />

Homer, C., Matha, D. V., Jordan, L. G., Wills, J. & Davis, G. K. (2001). Community-based<br />

<strong>continuity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>midwifery</strong> <strong>care</strong> versus standard hospital <strong>care</strong>: a cost analysis. Australian<br />

Health Review. 24(1), 85-93.<br />

Lauzon, L. & Hodnett, E. (2001). Labour assessment programs <strong>to</strong> delay admission <strong>to</strong> labour<br />

wards. Cochrane Database <strong>of</strong> Systematic Reviews 2001. Issue 3. Art. No.:CD000936.<br />

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000936. Retrieved from www2.cochrane.org/reviews/en/<br />

ab000936.html<br />

<strong>Delivering</strong> <strong>continuity</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>midwifery</strong> <strong>care</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Queensland</strong> <strong>women</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!