Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>IT</strong> HOLDING S.p.A. Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002<br />
25. Other long-term liabilities<br />
Other long-term liabilities at December 31 2002 and 2001 are made up as follows:<br />
December 31,<br />
2002 2001<br />
Increase<br />
(decrease)<br />
(In thousands of Euros)<br />
Agents’ termination benefits ..........................................................................................<br />
Others<br />
4,100 3,007 1,093<br />
—Provision for return on sales....................................................................................... 3,190 3,476 (286)<br />
—Provision for tax contingences ................................................................................... 3,251 2,953 298<br />
—Provision for other contingences................................................................................ 4,207 476 3,731<br />
Total................................................................................................................................ 14,748 9,912 4,836<br />
Agents’ termination benefits are calculated on the basis of the charge to be paid on the termination of agency<br />
contracts in compliance with law and other relevant factors such as historical data, the average duration of agents’<br />
contracts and their turnover.<br />
The amount of the Agent’s termination benefits has been determined based on the present value of the expenditures<br />
expected to be required to settle the obligation.<br />
Other mainly includes:<br />
• €3,190 thousand in relation to the provision for returns on sales, set up to cover the unrealized profit arising from<br />
the difference between the sales value of possible returns to be received after year end, but pertaining to the year,<br />
and their estimated recovery value.<br />
• Estimated costs of €4,207 thousand principally arising from litigation mainly relating to the Ferré Group, as<br />
follows: — lawsuit brought against GIANFRANCO FERRÉ S.p.A. by Tecnostile S.r.l. of Firenze, claiming<br />
damages of approximately Euro 620 thousand for pre-contractual liability. The judge is currently gathering<br />
evidence. — GIANFRANCO FERRÉ S.p.A. learned of a request put forth by the receivers of the Redaelli<br />
bankruptcy for reimbursement of payments made by Redaelli S.p.A. between March 1998 and March 1999. To<br />
date, a lawsuit has not yet been brought against the company and, on the basis of the legal advisors’ opinion, it is<br />
not probable that the company would lose any such case. — At the end of 2003, GIANFRANCO FERRÉ S.p.A.<br />
reached an out-of-court settlement with the receivers of Gruppo Nadini S.p.A., settling the litigation pending at<br />
December 31, 2002. — A lawsuit brought against GIANFRANCO FERRÉ S.p.A. by Mr. Ronald Bohler (former<br />
CEO of the company), claiming that he had been dismissed without cause. On November 2, 2002, the company<br />
appeared in Court challenging all Mr. Bohler’s inferences and claims. The provision at December 31, 2002<br />
reflects the maximum potential risk on the basis of updated estimates, considering the opinions of the company’’s<br />
external advisors.<br />
• In 2002 the remaining amount of €3.251 thousands (2001: € 2.953) in liabilities relates to the tax provision that<br />
reflects estimated contingent tax liabilities which the following Group companies may have to pay following the<br />
tax disputes currently pending with the tax authorities. — M.A.C.—Manifatture Associate Cashmere S.p.A.<br />
The tax dispute that arose with regard to 1989, for which the Firenze Tax Commission issued sentence no. 107/17/02<br />
of November 23, 2002, lodged on January 15, 2003, was definitively settled pursuant to article 16 of Law<br />
no. 289/2002.<br />
The preliminary assessment report served in 1998 relating to 1995, 1996, and 1997, alleging this company’s<br />
realization of a higher taxable base for direct tax purposes, and mainly focusing the tax recovery on the transfer<br />
pricing applied to foreign Group companies, was followed by notices of assessment for 1995 and 1996. The company<br />
has appealed with the relevant judicial authorities.<br />
F- 122