14.11.2012 Views

185000000 IT Holding Finance SA

185000000 IT Holding Finance SA

185000000 IT Holding Finance SA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IT</strong> HOLDING S.p.A. Notes to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2002<br />

collection previously capitalized, have been expensed. Costs related to the design and production of the prototypes,<br />

samples and models have been capitalized as investments in collection development.<br />

Development Costs<br />

Under Italian Accounting Principles, development costs may be capitalized as intangible assets and amortized on a<br />

straight-line basis over a period not exceeding five years, if certain conditions are met. These costs are written down<br />

to their recoverable amount when an impairment exists.<br />

Under IFRS, development costs must be capitalized. However for the capitalization of development costs the<br />

company should be able to satisfy certain restrictive criteria which include how the intangible asset will generate<br />

future economic benefit and the ability to reliably measure the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset.<br />

(d) Government Grants<br />

Under Italian Accounting Principles, government grants (or contributions) received as compensation for expenses<br />

already incurred are recognized in the income statement once the conditions for their receipt have been met and there<br />

is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received. Revenue-based grants are deferred in the balance sheet and<br />

released to the income statement to match the related expenditure that they are intended to compensate. Capital-based<br />

grants must be deferred and matched with the depreciation on the asset for which the grant arises. Grants that relate to<br />

recognized assets must be presented in the balance sheet as either deferred income, or by deducting the grant in<br />

arriving at the carrying amount of the asset, in which case the grant is recognized as a reduction of depreciation. This<br />

treatment is similar to IFRS.<br />

However certain past transactions occurred before 1998, had been recorded under Italian standards crediting net<br />

equity instead of deferred income. These have been adjusted accordingly.<br />

(e) Revaluation of Fixed Assets “deemed cost”<br />

The Group elected to revalue certain items of property, plan and equipment at the date of transition to IFRS at its fair<br />

value and use this fair value as deemed cost at that date.<br />

The detail is as follows:<br />

Shareholders’<br />

equity<br />

January 1,<br />

2001<br />

Group<br />

net<br />

result<br />

2001<br />

Effect of<br />

merger<br />

2001<br />

F- 137<br />

Shareholders’<br />

equity<br />

January 1,<br />

2002<br />

Group<br />

net<br />

result<br />

2002<br />

Movements in<br />

Shareholders’<br />

equity<br />

2002<br />

Shareholders’<br />

equity<br />

December 31,<br />

2002<br />

(In thousands of Euros)<br />

Building ALLISON S.p.A. ........ 1,449 12 — 1,461 20 — 1,481<br />

Building <strong>IT</strong>TIERRE S.p.A......... (388) 223 — (165) 308 722 865<br />

Building M.A.C. S.p.A. ............. 1,078 6 — 1,084 (4) — 1,080<br />

Building FD S.p.A...................... 1,197 — (1,197) 0 — — —<br />

Building <strong>IT</strong>J S.p.A. .................... (557) 82 1,197 722 — (722) 0<br />

Total........................................... 2,779 323 — 3,102 324 — 3,426<br />

The positive effect on Group net result in 2002 and 2001 is due to a change in the estimated residual useful life of<br />

these revaluated assets compared to the estimate under Italian principles.<br />

(f) Provision for Risks and Charges<br />

Under Italian Accounting Principles, unlike IFRS, the amount of expected future cash expenditure necessary to settle<br />

an obligation is not required to be discounted.<br />

Under IFRS the amount of the Agent’s termination benefits has been re-determined based on the present value of the<br />

expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!