Chapter 9 - Instructional Media: Chalkboards to Video - CGISS
Chapter 9 - Instructional Media: Chalkboards to Video - CGISS
Chapter 9 - Instructional Media: Chalkboards to Video - CGISS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
would do something. Simulations can be repeated <strong>to</strong> achieve<br />
continuous improvement until a standard level of performance<br />
is reached.<br />
Limitations: The simulations have <strong>to</strong> be designed for each<br />
situation in which performance is being assessed. Designing<br />
and building the simulations is costly and time consuming.<br />
Once a student is made aware that the situation is a simulation,<br />
stresses associated with real world performance are<br />
significantly reduced, resulting in an inaccurate measure of the<br />
student’s actual capacity <strong>to</strong> perform.<br />
Contextual considerations: The simula<strong>to</strong>r must be tested and<br />
calibrated at the student’s location. Many simulations are done<br />
with computers, and this makes their assessment results easy<br />
<strong>to</strong> pass on <strong>to</strong> other computers.<br />
<br />
Resources on<br />
Testing<br />
Books/Articles<br />
• Anderson, P. S. (1987). The MDT innovation: Machine scoring of fillin-the-blank<br />
tests. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED<br />
307 287)<br />
• Astin, A. W. (1991). Assessment for excellence: The philosophy and<br />
practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education. New<br />
York: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.<br />
• Ben-Chiam, D., & Zoller, U. (1997). Examination-type preferences of<br />
secondary school students and their teachers in the science<br />
disciplines. <strong>Instructional</strong> Science, 25, (5), 347-67.<br />
• Bloom, B. S., & Madaus, G. (1981). Evaluation <strong>to</strong> improve learning.<br />
New York: McGraw-Hill.<br />
• Boaler, J. (1998). Alternative approaches <strong>to</strong> teaching, learning and<br />
assessing mathematics. Evaluation and Program Planning, 21 (2),<br />
129-141<br />
• Cashin, W. E. (1987). Improving essay tests. (Idea Paper No. 17).<br />
Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center for Faculty<br />
Evaluation & Development.<br />
• Clegg, V. L., & Cashin, W. E. (1986). Improving multiple-choice test.<br />
(Idea Paper No. 16). Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Center<br />
for Faculty Evaluation & Development.<br />
• Cooke, J. C., Drennan, J. D., & Drennan, P. (1997). Peer evaluation<br />
as a real life-learning <strong>to</strong>ol. The Technology Teacher, 23-27<br />
• Cross, K. P., & Angelo, T.A. (1993). Classroom assessment<br />
techniques: A handbook for college teachers (2 nd ed.). San Francisco:<br />
Jossey-Bass.<br />
Section: Student Assessment 185 <strong>Chapter</strong> 12: Testing Issues