02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter I<br />

Additional multinational guidance is available in <strong>JP</strong> 1, Doctrine for the Armed <strong>Force</strong>s of the<br />

United States, <strong>JP</strong> 3-0, <strong>Joint</strong> Operations, <strong>JP</strong> 3-16, Multinational Operations, and <strong>JP</strong> 4-08,<br />

Logistics in Support of Multinational Operations.<br />

e. Considerations Related to Other Potential Partners<br />

(1) Integration and coordination among the military force and interorganizational<br />

counterparts are much less rigid than military C2. Unlike the military and other USG<br />

departments and agencies to a certain extent, most interorganizational partners are not<br />

staffed, equipped, or organized to plan and operate in a wide variety of situations across the<br />

military’s range of operations. The lack of a prescribed or uniform interorganizational<br />

coordination process will require the CJTF and staff to be aware of their partners’ various<br />

and somewhat unique structures, processes, procedures, and organizational cultures in order<br />

to accommodate their participation with the military. Some organizations may have policies<br />

that conflict with those of the USG, particularly those of the US military. Depending on the<br />

type of operation, the extent of military operations, and degree of interorganizational<br />

involvement, the focal point for coordination may occur at the JTF HQ, the civil-military<br />

operations center (CMOC), or the humanitarian operations center.<br />

(2) Unlike many USG departments and agencies and multinational military<br />

partners, most other interorganizational partners will not have the capability and appropriate<br />

authorization to handle or have access to classified information. An important consideration<br />

is how to balance and control information in a way that involves relevant partners’<br />

capabilities and contributions while preserving operations security (OPSEC). Information<br />

sharing with NGOs and the private sector may be more restrictive, but options such as the<br />

JIACG and CMOC are available to the JFC to facilitate interorganizational coordination and<br />

information sharing.<br />

4. <strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong>-State<br />

When a state governor responds to support requests from civil authorities by activating<br />

Air National Guard and NG forces, a joint task force-state (JTF-State) may be formed;<br />

however, it is not a Title 10, United States Code (USC), JTF as described in <strong>JP</strong> 1, Doctrine<br />

for the Armed <strong>Force</strong>s of the United States. The JTF-State establishing authority is the<br />

governor of a state and is based on state law.<br />

For more details concerning JTF-State, refer to Appendix E, “<strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong>-State.” For<br />

more information on civil support operations, refer to <strong>JP</strong> 3-28, <strong>Defense</strong> Support of Civil<br />

Authorities.<br />

I-10 <strong>JP</strong> 3-<strong>33</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!