02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong> Command and Control<br />

force (RUF). ROE and RUF are specific authorizations and limitations by which the<br />

President, SecDef, and operational commanders regulate the use of armed force in the<br />

context of applicable political and military policy and domestic and international law. When<br />

read in conjunction with the commanders guidance and intent, ROE and RUF are rules that<br />

govern when, where, against whom, and how force can be used. RUF are distinguished from<br />

ROE in that RUF are typically used for armed forces performing security or law enforcement<br />

functions. In addition, non-DOD entities such as state and local law enforcement or NG<br />

forces may also have established RUF that need to be considered in domestic operations<br />

where DOD forces operate in close proximity.<br />

(2) ROE and RUF generally provide authority for or impose limitations on the use<br />

of force by commanders and individuals based on three types of considerations:<br />

(a) Military. Properly developed ROE and RUF clarify the inherent right and<br />

obligation of unit self-defense.<br />

(b) Diplomatic and Political. ROE and RUF are a reflection of USG and<br />

partner nations diplomatic and political will.<br />

(c) Legal. ROE and RUF also are a reflection of international and domestic<br />

law and existing multilateral and bilateral agreements and arrangements.<br />

(3) ROE and RUF will change as the mission evolves. Commanders should<br />

develop use of force measures that provide subordinate commanders with sufficient<br />

flexibility to adapt to changing conditions to accomplish assigned missions and tasks. Those<br />

measures may be influenced by the commander’s judgment, the intent of higher authorities,<br />

the requirements of subordinates, the training of the force, and the concerns of multinational<br />

partners. Nothing in the ROE or RUF limit the inherent authority and obligation to use all<br />

necessary means available and to take all appropriate action in unit self-defense consistent<br />

with the law of armed conflict.<br />

(4) ROE and RUF issues emerge during the planning process as the staff<br />

begins to develop COAs. Required ROE should be identified during COA development.<br />

The supported CCDR may provide ROE and RUF guidance to the CJTF via initial planning<br />

documents, which may precede COA development. The CJTF’s proposed mission-specific<br />

ROE and RUF should be developed, exercised, and modified as necessary to support mission<br />

planning during the COA development, war gaming, analysis, and selection process.<br />

Mission objectives must drive the ROE and RUF formulation process and not vice versa.<br />

(5) ROE and RUF development, distribution, training, and modification must<br />

be timely and responsive to changing mission and threat parameters.<br />

(6) Standing Rules of Engagement (SROE). The President and SecDef have<br />

provided the SROE as standalone guidance for US forces worldwide that are equally<br />

applicable to all the CCMDs and can be easily amended or clarified to meet mission-specific<br />

requirements. SROE apply in addition to specific guidance, if any, from higher authority in<br />

the form of supplemental measures. SROE also provide lists of numbered supplemental<br />

IV-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!