02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Joint</strong> <strong>Task</strong> <strong>Force</strong> Command and Control<br />

(b) Unit commanders always retain the inherent right and obligation to<br />

exercise unit self-defense in response to a hostile act or demonstrated hostile intent. Unit<br />

self-defense includes the defense of other DOD forces in the vicinity.<br />

(c) JTF SJAs should coordinate with NG counterparts when operating in a<br />

domestic support environment to confirm the RUF approved for use by the NG. There may<br />

be a difference between the ROE or RUF approved for DOD forces and the RUF for each<br />

states NG forces operating in state active duty or Title 32, USC, status. Depending on the<br />

state, because NG RUF are based on the criminal law of the state in which an NG unit is<br />

performing the mission, the RUF may be more or less restrictive than the approved DOD<br />

RUF.<br />

For more details concerning ROE and RUF, refer to the CJCSI 3121.01, Standing Rules of<br />

Engagement/Standing Rules for the Use of <strong>Force</strong> for US <strong>Force</strong>s (SECRET).<br />

f. Interorganizational (Less Multinational) Considerations<br />

(1) Relationships between the JTF and USG departments and agencies, IGOs, and<br />

NGOs should not be equated to the C2 of a military operation. During combat operations<br />

such as Operation DESERT STORM or in foreign humanitarian assistance (FHA) operations<br />

such as Operation PROVIDE COMFORT, DOD was the lead agency and was supported by<br />

other USG departments and agencies. When DOD is tasked to provide DSCA, its forces<br />

perform in a supporting role. Whether supported or supporting, close coordination between<br />

the military and other non-DOD agencies is a key to successful interagency coordination.<br />

Successful interagency, IGO, and NGO coordination enables the JTF to build support,<br />

conserve resources, and conduct coherent operations that efficiently achieve shared goals<br />

through unity of effort.<br />

(2) NGOs do not operate within a military, governmental, United Nations (UN), or<br />

other IGO hierarchies. As private organizations, NGOs are very unlikely to place<br />

themselves in a supporting role to the military. However, an associate or partnership<br />

relationship may develop during some missions. For example, if the UN has provided a<br />

grant to an NGO to implement a project, the NGO would be considered its “implementing<br />

partner.” If formed, the CMOC is the focal point where US military forces coordinate any<br />

support to NGOs.<br />

(a) As mentioned above, a coordinated effort between the JTF and USG<br />

departments and agencies, NGOs, and IGOs is essential to achieve our national objectives<br />

but should not be equated to the C2 of a military operation. Military operations depend upon<br />

a command structure that often is very different from that of civilian organizations. These<br />

differences may present significant challenges to coordination efforts. The various USG<br />

departments’ and agencies’ different, and sometimes conflicting, goals, policies, procedures,<br />

and decision-making techniques make achieving unity of effort a challenge. Still more<br />

difficult, some NGOs and IGOs may have policies that are explicitly antithetical to those of<br />

the USG, and particularly the US military.<br />

IV-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!