Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1 (18 JULY 2005)<br />
Danger marks such situation in which, according to objectively existing circumstances, could be<br />
justifiably assumed or predicted that violation of some legal property, disregarding the subject (physical<br />
or legal person) to which it belongs, is imminent. Therefore, danger is the state where some legal property<br />
is endangered and, according to circumstances of the particular case, there is imminent possibility of its<br />
violation.<br />
There are several kinds of this danger and it is almost impossible to determine in advance in which way<br />
and manner they could be manifested in everyday life situations. Whether there is real danger of<br />
endangering some legal property of a perpetrator or some other person is being judged according to<br />
objective criteria of “reality of danger” in each specific case. Therefore, danger is the state where violation<br />
of endangered property is imminent and unavoidable. Danger and possibility of endangering or violation<br />
some legal property objectively exists, and it is a real category which results from everyday life and the<br />
environment, and it is stated in the prognosis about possible further development of the situation which is<br />
based on given circumstances of that situation 6 .<br />
Certain conditions for the existence of danger, cumulatively provided by law, have to be fulfilled so that<br />
the institute of extreme necessity in each particular case could exist. These conditions are:<br />
1) Danger could be caused by man, animal, forces of nature (fire, water, earthquake) or objects. Therefore,<br />
sources of danger could be very different. Human action, in the sense of creating danger as an element of<br />
extreme necessity, should be differentiated from action in the sense of attack with the institute of<br />
necessary defence. Here, human action was not aimed at provoking danger for some legal property of<br />
other person, even more, there was no intention or aim in the conscience of a perpetrator. These are cases<br />
of various incautious or careless handling with inflammable, poisonous or explosive materials, driving<br />
power or vehicle, or during construction work, where danger for someone’s legal property is caused 7 .<br />
Dangerous animals like dog, bull, ram, horse, wild animals can also cause danger for one’s legal property.<br />
Forces of nature and natural disasters can also, suddenly and in great scope endanger properties of one<br />
person, or, more often, more people and sometimes even society in general. A person that is in the state of<br />
extreme necessity undertakes his duty which is aimed at eliminating or preventing this danger, by<br />
imminent action on the source of the danger. In case when an object is the source of danger, in the sense<br />
of institute of extreme necessity, it could be any device, machine or equipment which, during its use or<br />
exploitation, causes danger. Such object, when affected by certain external cause or damage, becomes<br />
extremely dangerous for people who use it.<br />
2) Any legal property or legal interest of any legal subject can be threatened by danger. In contrast to<br />
previous decisions, when extreme necessity was excused only in case of attack on life and physical attack,<br />
present law provisions this kind of defence expand to all legal properties. Criminal code of Kingdom of<br />
Yugoslavia from 1929. 8 , in article 25. explicitly provides the properties which could be defended in case<br />
of extreme necessity: life, body, freedom, honour, estate, as well as any other property. Criminal<br />
legislature in effect does not limit legal properties which could be protected in this way, but according to<br />
their nature and character, they are only the most significant properties, most often life and physical<br />
integrity 9 .<br />
6 Miloš Babić, Krajnja nužda u krivičnom pravu, Banja Luka, 1987.p.82<br />
7 Milić Tomanović, Nužna odbrana i krajnja nužda, Službeni list SRJ; Beograd, 1985.p.162<br />
8 Mihajlo Čubinski, Naučni i praktični komentar Krivičnog zakonika Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Beograd, 1934. p. 94-95<br />
9 Ljubiša Jovanović, Dragan Jovašević, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Nomos, Beograd, 2002. p. 114<br />
DR. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - THE EXTREME NECESSITY IN CRIMINAL LAW OF SERBIA AND<br />
MONTENEGRO<br />
110