30.03.2015 Views

Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.

Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.

Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1 (18 JULY 2005)<br />

Danger marks such situation in which, according to objectively existing circumstances, could be<br />

justifiably assumed or predicted that violation of some legal property, disregarding the subject (physical<br />

or legal person) to which it belongs, is imminent. Therefore, danger is the state where some legal property<br />

is endangered and, according to circumstances of the particular case, there is imminent possibility of its<br />

violation.<br />

There are several kinds of this danger and it is almost impossible to determine in advance in which way<br />

and manner they could be manifested in everyday life situations. Whether there is real danger of<br />

endangering some legal property of a perpetrator or some other person is being judged according to<br />

objective criteria of “reality of danger” in each specific case. Therefore, danger is the state where violation<br />

of endangered property is imminent and unavoidable. Danger and possibility of endangering or violation<br />

some legal property objectively exists, and it is a real category which results from everyday life and the<br />

environment, and it is stated in the prognosis about possible further development of the situation which is<br />

based on given circumstances of that situation 6 .<br />

Certain conditions for the existence of danger, cumulatively provided by law, have to be fulfilled so that<br />

the institute of extreme necessity in each particular case could exist. These conditions are:<br />

1) Danger could be caused by man, animal, forces of nature (fire, water, earthquake) or objects. Therefore,<br />

sources of danger could be very different. Human action, in the sense of creating danger as an element of<br />

extreme necessity, should be differentiated from action in the sense of attack with the institute of<br />

necessary defence. Here, human action was not aimed at provoking danger for some legal property of<br />

other person, even more, there was no intention or aim in the conscience of a perpetrator. These are cases<br />

of various incautious or careless handling with inflammable, poisonous or explosive materials, driving<br />

power or vehicle, or during construction work, where danger for someone’s legal property is caused 7 .<br />

Dangerous animals like dog, bull, ram, horse, wild animals can also cause danger for one’s legal property.<br />

Forces of nature and natural disasters can also, suddenly and in great scope endanger properties of one<br />

person, or, more often, more people and sometimes even society in general. A person that is in the state of<br />

extreme necessity undertakes his duty which is aimed at eliminating or preventing this danger, by<br />

imminent action on the source of the danger. In case when an object is the source of danger, in the sense<br />

of institute of extreme necessity, it could be any device, machine or equipment which, during its use or<br />

exploitation, causes danger. Such object, when affected by certain external cause or damage, becomes<br />

extremely dangerous for people who use it.<br />

2) Any legal property or legal interest of any legal subject can be threatened by danger. In contrast to<br />

previous decisions, when extreme necessity was excused only in case of attack on life and physical attack,<br />

present law provisions this kind of defence expand to all legal properties. Criminal code of Kingdom of<br />

Yugoslavia from 1929. 8 , in article 25. explicitly provides the properties which could be defended in case<br />

of extreme necessity: life, body, freedom, honour, estate, as well as any other property. Criminal<br />

legislature in effect does not limit legal properties which could be protected in this way, but according to<br />

their nature and character, they are only the most significant properties, most often life and physical<br />

integrity 9 .<br />

6 Miloš Babić, Krajnja nužda u krivičnom pravu, Banja Luka, 1987.p.82<br />

7 Milić Tomanović, Nužna odbrana i krajnja nužda, Službeni list SRJ; Beograd, 1985.p.162<br />

8 Mihajlo Čubinski, Naučni i praktični komentar Krivičnog zakonika Kraljevine Jugoslavije, Beograd, 1934. p. 94-95<br />

9 Ljubiša Jovanović, Dragan Jovašević, Krivično pravo, Opšti deo, Nomos, Beograd, 2002. p. 114<br />

DR. DRAGAN JOVAŠEVIĆ - THE EXTREME NECESSITY IN CRIMINAL LAW OF SERBIA AND<br />

MONTENEGRO<br />

110

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!