Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1 (18 JULY 2005)<br />
In formulary system of Roman procedural law, the actions which are called iudicia legitima –actions<br />
founded upon law 22 , expire directly, even if no decision is given after eighteen months have elapsed from<br />
the conclusion of the litis contestatio 23 . Besides, the actions which are called iudicia imperio continentia –<br />
actions derived from the authority of a magistrate 24 expire directly, even if no decision is given when the<br />
service period of the magistra who has accepted the action’s formula is over 25 . Thus, if in the first action,<br />
the joinder of issue phase is concluded, it is impossible to maintain an action subsequently with reference<br />
to same contentious issue. Such an obligation, is considered as an obligatio naturalis 26 , because no action<br />
is granted for this kind of obligation (D. 1, 5, 25) 27 .<br />
According to Gaius 4, 107; if however a personal action is based on a statement that has been brought by<br />
the formula relating to the claims under the civil law, an action can not subsequently be maintained with<br />
reference to the same matter by operation of law and for this reason an exception will be superfluous. If<br />
however, a real action or a equitable personal action based upon fact, should be brought, proceedings may<br />
nevertheless subsequently instituted, by operation of law, and based on this account an exception on the<br />
ground that the question has already been decided, or that issue has been joined, will be necessary 28 .<br />
Praetor turns definite judgement to account by himself spontaneously, that is ipso iure if the action fulfil<br />
these conditions; First of all, the action must be an action founded upon law. Secondly, it must be a<br />
personal action. And lastly, the formula of this action must be in form of in ius concepta.<br />
condemn the said freedman to pay to the said patron the sum of ten thousand sesterces. If the case should not be proved,<br />
discharge him. The other formulas mentioned in the Edith with reference to the summoning on the parties into court, refer to<br />
matters of fact; as for instance, against a person who, having been summoned into court, neither appeared nor appointed anyone<br />
to defend him; and also against one who rescued by force a party who was summoned to appear and in conclusion innumerable<br />
other formulas of this description are set forth in the register of the praetor. Gai. 4, 47; In some instances, however the praetor<br />
permits formulas having reference to either law or fact to be employed; for example in actions deposit and loan for use. The<br />
following formula is one of law.”Let So-and So be the judge. Whereas Aulus Agerius deposited a silver table with Numerius<br />
Negidius, for which this action is brought, whatever Numerius Negidius is obliged to pay to, or do for Aulus Agerius in good<br />
faith, on this account, do you judge, condemn Numerius Negidius to pay to, or do for Aulus Agerius, unless he makes<br />
restitution; and if the case should not be proved, let him be discharged. The following formulas one of fact. Let so-and so be the<br />
judge. If it appears that Aulus Agerius deposited a silver table with Numerius Negidius and through the fraud of the said<br />
Numerius Negidius, the said table has not been restored to the said Aulus Agerius, do you judge condemn Numerius Negidius<br />
to pay to Aulus Agerius a sum money equal to the value of the property and if the case is not proved, let him be discharged.<br />
Similar formulas are employed in an action of loan for use. Zulueta, p. 195.<br />
22 Gai. 4, 104; Actions founded upon law (iudicia legitima), are those which are brought in the City of Rome or within the first<br />
mile-stone from that city, between Roman citizens before a single judge. Those brought under the Lex Iulia Iudiciaria expire<br />
after the lapse of a year and six months, unless they have been previously decided; and this is the reason why it is commonly<br />
stated that under the Lex Iulia a case dies after a year and six months have elapsed. Umur, (Dictionary), p. 95;<br />
23 Pugliese, G.; Il Processo Civile Romano, Il Processo Formularae, V. II, Milan, 1963, p. 275 (Processo); These arrangements<br />
are settled by Lex Iulia Iudiciaria.<br />
24 Gai. 4, 105; Actions derived from the authority of a magistrate (iudicia imperia continentia) are those brought before several<br />
judges, or before a single judge, if either latter or one of the litigants is an alien. These actions belong to the same class as those<br />
which are brought beyond the first mile-stone from the City of Rome; whether the parties litigant are Roman citienzs or aliens.<br />
Cases of this kind are said to be derived from the authority of a magistrate, for this reason that the proceedings are only valid as<br />
long as he who directed them to be instituted retains his office. Umur, (Dictionary), p. 96;<br />
25 Zulueta, p. 277; This distinction is not the same as that between a civil and a praetorian action. Hence, a praetorian action<br />
would be iudicia legitima if it fulfils the conditions, and a civil action would be iudicia imperio continentia if it fulfils the<br />
conditions.<br />
26 Longo, G.; Ricerche sull’”Obligatio Naturalis”, Milan, 1962, p. 19 sp.; For obligatio naturalis, no action is laid, but they can<br />
be made effective in other ways. There are some kinds of this obligation and each kind shows its effects to the different extent.<br />
27 Pugliese, p. 413 (Actio); Tahiroglu/Erdogmus, (Matters), p. 196.<br />
28 “Gai. 4, 107; Si vero legitimo iudicio in personam actum sit ea formula, quae iuris civilis habet intentionem, postea ipso iure<br />
de eadem re agi non potest, et ob id exceptio supervacua est; si vero vel in rem vel in factum actum fuerit, ipso iure nihilo<br />
minus postea agi potest, et ob id exceptio necessaria est rei iudicatae vel in iudicium deductae”.<br />
GOKCE TURKOGLU-OZDEMIR - “BIS DE EADEM RE NE SIT ACTIO” PRINCIPLE IN THE FORMULARY SYSTEM OF ROMAN LAW OF PROCEDURE 144