Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
Free_Law_Journal-Vol.. - Free World Publishing Inc.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
FREE LAW JOURNAL - VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1 (18 JULY 2005)<br />
the administration of estates. 7 The duties of solicitors towards their clients are governed both by statute<br />
and their code of professional conduct. In the case of barristers the obligations are governed solely by the<br />
dictates of professional etiquette. The rules of conduct may change from time to time and may be altered<br />
by the Inns of Court on behalf of their members or by the Senate of the Inns of Court and the Bar. 8<br />
Even from the introductory sentences it is clear that here I am speaking about representatives of two<br />
different professions which has its own traditions and areas of practice inside one field. These professions<br />
have evolved as separate ones. The advocates with audience in the common law courts were the serjeants<br />
and barristers. While the preparatory work was carried out by officer of the court, known as attorneys. In<br />
such a way developed two classes of legal practitioners: serjeants and barristers on the one hand and<br />
attorneys, solicitors at present time, who are officers of the court, on the other. Since the UK has its<br />
distinctive legal system, the possibility of having two types of legal practitioners should be regarded as a<br />
common trait of such system. The whole legal system of the UK has shown that it can proceed very well,<br />
since the barristers and solicitors are indispensable part of this system there is no need to change the status<br />
quo.<br />
With regard to a controversial issue of fusion Royal Commission, which was set up in 1976 to inquire into<br />
the law and practice relating to the provision of legal services in England, Wales and Northern Ireland<br />
stated:” a two-branch profession is more likely than a fused one to ensure the high quality of advocacy<br />
which is indispensable, so long as our system remains in its present form, to secure the proper quality of<br />
justice” 9 Who else than a Royal commission can adjudicate on the appropriateness of having two separate<br />
legal professions. Since the small cases can be handled by the barrister or solicitor separately, large cases<br />
will demand far greater input. The outcome of such case in situation where it is handled by either barrister<br />
or solicitor will be unpredictable.<br />
In some areas barristers and solicitors are performing similar tasks. For example, barristers are mainly<br />
engaged in “paper-work”, while solicitors are dealing with preparatory stages of litigation such as the<br />
preparation of evidence, issuing writs. The nature of these actions is similar. Nevertheless, they are<br />
performed to achieve different goals. Since only solicitors have a right of audience in most courts and<br />
tribunals and are instructed by their clients directly, it may appear that barristers, who have access only to<br />
magistrates, are put in unfair position. It may seem that while comparing to the structure of ECJ a solicitor<br />
is similar to Advocate General of ECJ and solicitors are similar to legal secretaries – representatives of<br />
lover level of hierarchy of ECJ. Maybe fusion may level their status? In practice this is not true. The<br />
distinction between these two professions is very strong. The right of access to the court does not always<br />
guarantee a solicitor higher salary or higher amount of clients. Barristers are drafting complex settlements<br />
and opinions on specialized maters such as taxation and company law. 10 Types of cases that barristers and<br />
solicitors are dealing with are completely different.<br />
Barristers and solicitors face similar types of problems. Since the representatives of both professions are<br />
bar members they are subject to the decision of the respective bar associations with regard to the fees<br />
charged. The comments about fees are based on the duty of “advocates (solicitors and barristers)” not to<br />
7 Note 1. Supra at 250.<br />
8 Note 1. Supra at 273.<br />
9 Report of the Royal Commission on Legal Services (Cmdh. 7648). Paras 17.45-17.46 in R. Walker (ed.) The English Legal<br />
System (Butterworths, 1985) at 250.<br />
10 Note 1. Supra at 249.<br />
VIKTORS URVAČOVS - BARRISTERS AND SOLICITORS SHALL REMAIN SEPARATE LEGAL PROFESSIONS<br />
138