12.05.2015 Views

Against communalism of the best-loser system - Lalit Mauritius

Against communalism of the best-loser system - Lalit Mauritius

Against communalism of the best-loser system - Lalit Mauritius

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT<br />

Delivered by Justice D. Seeetulsingh<br />

Record Number 71430<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court <strong>of</strong> <strong>Mauritius</strong><br />

In <strong>the</strong> matter <strong>of</strong>:<br />

Parvez Carrimkhan<br />

APPLICANT<br />

v/s<br />

Tin How Lew Chin & Ors.<br />

RESPONDENTS<br />

In <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong>:<br />

The Electoral Commissioner<br />

CO-RESPONDENT<br />

Judgment<br />

Applicant has questioned <strong>the</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> declaration made by Respondents Nos. 1 to 26 relating to<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir community on <strong>the</strong>ir nomination paper for <strong>the</strong> general elections. In his application made under<br />

paragraph 3 (2) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> First Schedule to <strong>the</strong> Constitution (<strong>the</strong> First Schedule) he prays <strong>the</strong> Court to resolve<br />

<strong>the</strong> question as to <strong>the</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> declaration.<br />

Applicant has averred that <strong>the</strong> wrongful declarations will upset <strong>the</strong> proper allocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>best</strong> <strong>loser</strong> seats<br />

after <strong>the</strong> proclamation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> general elections. In evidence he has stated that <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Respondents were indicative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y did not belong to <strong>the</strong> community stated in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

declaration.<br />

The particulars given by Respondents are as follows :<br />

No Name Party Community Constituency<br />

1. Tin How LEW CHIN Nouvo Lizour Hindu 1<br />

2. Ange Laval YVES <strong>Lalit</strong> Hindu 1<br />

3. Dany Sylvie MARIE <strong>Lalit</strong> Hindu 2<br />

4. Diya DHOLAH <strong>Lalit</strong> Muslim 4<br />

5. Shardanand LILLDHARRY <strong>Lalit</strong> Sino-Mauritian 6<br />

6. Alain AH VEE <strong>Lalit</strong> Hindu 7<br />

7. Antoine Joyce HENRI-HELOISE Nouvo-Lizour Hindu 7<br />

8. Louis Jerry Michael MINERVE Nouvo-Lizour Hindu 7<br />

9. Christian BATOUR <strong>Lalit</strong> Muslim 9<br />

10. Seeven KISTNASAMY <strong>Lalit</strong> Muslim 10<br />

11. Pravin RAMSEWAK <strong>Lalit</strong> Muslim 11<br />

12. Ashok SUBRON <strong>Lalit</strong> Muslim 13<br />

13. Deoparsad Ram SEEGOBIN <strong>Lalit</strong> G. Population 14<br />

14. Devianand NARAIN <strong>Lalit</strong> Muslim 15<br />

15. Dooven CALEECHURN <strong>Lalit</strong> Sino-Mauritian 16<br />

16. Rajni LALLAH <strong>Lalit</strong> G. Population 17<br />

17. Marie Thérèse Jocelin MINERVE Nouvo Lizour Hindu 17<br />

18. Francis JOLICOEUR <strong>Lalit</strong> Sino-Mauritian 18<br />

19. Muniswamy ANENDEN Tamil Council G. Population 19<br />

20. Devarajen KANAKSABEE Tamil Council G. Population 19<br />

21. Logonaden MANIKUM Tamil Council G. Population 19<br />

22. Ananda NULLAH Tamil Council G. Population 20<br />

23. Yves Alain M. J. PITCHEN Nouvo-Lizour Hindu 20<br />

24. Veerasamy POULLAY RENGHEN Tamil Council G. Population 20<br />

25. Suraj RAMDIN <strong>Lalit</strong> G. Population 20<br />

26. Carpen Soopramanien SUNGALEE Tamil Council G. Population 20<br />

At <strong>the</strong> hearing Respondents Nos. 19, 20, 21, 22 and 24 who are candidates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tamil Council have<br />

deponed to say that <strong>the</strong>y were a<strong>the</strong>ists (except for Respondent No. 19 who claimed to belong to <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!