06.06.2015 Views

Untitled - Neccdep.com

Untitled - Neccdep.com

Untitled - Neccdep.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TRINCOMALEE BAY SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA Page | 58<br />

275. Lands are available for hotel development in an eco-friendly manner<br />

4. Threats<br />

276. Illegal fishing activities may adversely effect the fish populations;<br />

277. Loss of biodiversity due to destruction of natural habitats – forests, mangroves;<br />

278. Pollution of water due to improper solid waste disposal by local authorities;<br />

279. Pollution of estuarine water from the excessive use of agro chemicals and untreated<br />

sewage.<br />

I. Planning process<br />

280. CCD guidelines suggested the Logical Framework Approach (LFA) as a suitable tool<br />

for SAMplanning and implementation. The LFA approach has been adopted accordingly.<br />

LFA is an analytical process and one of tools used to support project planning and<br />

management. It provides set of interlocking concepts which are used as part of an<br />

iterative process to aid structured and systematic analysis of a project or programme<br />

idea. It allows information to be analyzed and organized in a structured way, so that<br />

important questions can be asked, weaknesses identified and decision makers can make<br />

informed decisions based on their improved understanding of the project rationale, its<br />

intended objectives and the means by which objectives will be achieved.<br />

281. The logical framework matrix (log frame) is used to provide a roadmap for delivering a<br />

significant objective or purpose by undertaking a number of activities. The log frame consists<br />

of a matrix with four columns and a number of rows. The project is delivered from bottom to<br />

top using a vertical logic containing a hierarchy of objectives specified in the first column. The<br />

second column provides indicators to be used to determine whether the project is being<br />

implemented successfully. The third column provides the means of verification for these<br />

indicators. The fourth column provides key risks and assumptions to delivery of the project. It<br />

should be noted that critical risks and assumptions that cannot be ac<strong>com</strong>modated within the<br />

project design as specified in the first column be<strong>com</strong>e killer risks and assumptions that make<br />

the project non-viable.<br />

282. The logical framework for this SAM Plan is given in Appendix 11. Considering the<br />

users of this document a user friendly simple activity plan is also developed based on the full<br />

logical framework. This simplified version is given below in Chapter VI. A key element of both<br />

versions is the use of management zones designed to separate in<strong>com</strong>patible uses and<br />

<strong>com</strong>bine <strong>com</strong>patible ones.<br />

J. Comparison of this SAM planning methodology with the CCD guidelines.<br />

283. A <strong>com</strong>parison of the methodology used for this SAM Plan with that re<strong>com</strong>mended by<br />

the CCD is given in Table V.4 below.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!